Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Accuracy (1)
- Algorithms (1)
- Care (1)
- Certification (1)
- Circuit Courts (1)
-
- Collaboration (1)
- Data (1)
- Disclosure (1)
- Doctors (1)
- Efficiency (1)
- Family and Medical Leave Act (1)
- Family members (1)
- Food and Drug Administration (1)
- Governance (1)
- Information (1)
- Informational requirements (1)
- Innovation (1)
- Law reform (1)
- Medical devices (1)
- Medical treatment (1)
- Medicine (1)
- Oversight (1)
- Patients (1)
- Psychological care (1)
- Regulation (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Regulating Black-Box Medicine, W. Nicholson Price Ii
Regulating Black-Box Medicine, W. Nicholson Price Ii
Michigan Law Review
Data drive modern medicine. And our tools to analyze those data are growing ever more powerful. As health data are collected in greater and greater amounts, sophisticated algorithms based on those data can drive medical innovation, improve the process of care, and increase efficiency. Those algorithms, however, vary widely in quality. Some are accurate and powerful, while others may be riddled with errors or based on faulty science. When an opaque algorithm recommends an insulin dose to a diabetic patient, how do we know that dose is correct? Patients, providers, and insurers face substantial difficulties in identifying high-quality algorithms; they …
The Fmla And Psychological Support: Courts Care About "Care" (And Employers Should, Too), Katherine Stallings Bailey
The Fmla And Psychological Support: Courts Care About "Care" (And Employers Should, Too), Katherine Stallings Bailey
Michigan Law Review
The Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”) recognizes an employee’s right to take leave to care for a qualifying family member. In light of the Act’s remedial nature, the intended scope of the care provision is broad, but its definitional details are sparse. As a result of the attendant interpretive discretion afforded to courts, the Seventh Circuit announced its rejection of the requirement—first articulated by the Ninth Circuit—that care provided during travel be related to continuing medical treatment. A facial analysis of the resulting circuit split fails to appreciate the fundamental difference between the Seventh and Ninth Circuits’ considerations: the …