Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Practice And Procedure - Direction Of Verdict - Scintilla Rule
Practice And Procedure - Direction Of Verdict - Scintilla Rule
Michigan Law Review
In an action to recover from the defendant gas company damage to the plaintiff's building caused by a gas explosion resulting from a defective pipe, the plaintiff's only evidence to prove the defendant's duty to repair it was that the pipe was used exclusively for the conveyance of the defendant's gas, and that the meters to which the pipe was connected were owned and controlled by the defendant. The trial court, by virtue of the scintilla rule, submitted the case to the jury which rendered a verdict for the plaintiff. Held, the scintilla rule no longer prevails in Ohio, …
Banks And Banking--Holder Of Draft Paid For By Check On Issuing Bank As Preferred Claim Upon Drawer's Insolvency
Michigan Law Review
A depositor presented his own check to his bank and received in exchange a New York draft drawn by the bank payable to a third person. The drawer bank was closed and the draft was dishonored. The depositor redeemed the draft and sought to establish a preferred claim against the bank's assets. In Fulton v. Baker-Toledo Co. the court held that a trust existed in favor of the depositor, under an Ohio statute which declares that when a check drawn by a depositor is presented to his bank for "collection and payment," and such check is charged against the depositor's …
Constitutional Law - Due Process - Fishing Rights In The Public Waters Of Michigan
Constitutional Law - Due Process - Fishing Rights In The Public Waters Of Michigan
Michigan Law Review
The Ne-Bo-Shone Association, Inc., is an Ohio corporation which owns property on both banks of the Pine River for some distance. Following the decision of the Michigan Supreme Court in Collins V. Gerhardt that the stream is navigable and public, the complainant association was ordered to remove obstructions in the stream which hampered the free use of the stream by the public for fishing purposes. Thereupon complainant sought an in junction against certain public officials from taking action to remove these obstructions, claiming that it has the right to exclude the public from this portion of the Pine River, and …
Trade Restraints - Covenants Restricting Owner's Use Of His Premises
Trade Restraints - Covenants Restricting Owner's Use Of His Premises
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiffs and defendant were competing theatre proprietors, owning buildings on opposite sides of the street in X city. For a monetary consideration defendant covenanted to discontinue forever the use of his building as a public theatre. Plaintiffs sought an injunction upon defendant's breach, and defendant demurred on the ground that the covenant was in restraint of trade and not ancillary to any property interest conveyed and requiring protection. Held, injunction granted, for in Ohio a contract in reasonable restraint of trade is enforceable though not incidental to some other independent contract or conveyance; and, if such transaction is necessary, …