Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Constitutional Law-Validity Of New York Statute Setting Out Motorists' Implied Consent To Chemical Tests For Intoxication, Richard A. Shupe S.Ed.
Constitutional Law-Validity Of New York Statute Setting Out Motorists' Implied Consent To Chemical Tests For Intoxication, Richard A. Shupe S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
The State of New York has approved a statute, to go into effect July 1, 1953, which stipulates that any person who operates a motor vehicle or motorcycle in the state shall be deemed to have given his consent to chemical tests of his breath, blood, urine, or saliva for the purpose of determining the alcoholic content of his blood. If such a person refuses to allow the tests, they will not be made, but the commissioner shall revoke his license or permit to drive, including the nonresident operating privilege. This is the first statute of its type and merits …
Corporations-Appointment Of Receiver Solely For The Purpose Of Bringing Suit, William A. Bain, Jr. S.Ed.
Corporations-Appointment Of Receiver Solely For The Purpose Of Bringing Suit, William A. Bain, Jr. S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
An ex parte petition was filed by a minority stockholder of a foreign corporation requesting the appointment of a special receiver for certain claims of the corporation against resident fiduciaries. The claims, which had not been prosecuted by the corporation, were about to be barred by the statute of limitations. A receiver was appointed and brought suit. The corporation appeared specially requesting that the order be set aside. Held, motion denied. A court of equity has inherent power to appoint a receiver for the assets of a foreign corporation in an ex parte proceeding instituted by a minority stockholder. …
Federal Procedure-Applicability Of State Decisional Law Interpreting State Statutes Of Limitations Under Section 11 (E) Of The Bankruptcy Act, Charles E. Oldfather S.Ed
Federal Procedure-Applicability Of State Decisional Law Interpreting State Statutes Of Limitations Under Section 11 (E) Of The Bankruptcy Act, Charles E. Oldfather S.Ed
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff is the trustee in bankruptcy of a Virginia corporation whose petition for reorganization under chapter X of the Bankruptcy Act was approved by a Virginia federal district court in 1942. Plaintiff filed this action in a New York federal district court under section 11 (e) of the Bankruptcy Act against defendant, the principal stockholder, and others for breach of fiduciary duty. The alleged breaches of duty occurred in 1927 and 1929. The defendant pleaded the New York statute of limitations and contended that it should be applied as interpreted by New York decisions, which hold that the statute begins …
Corporation-Officers And Directors-Relationship Between Cumulative Voting And Removal Provisions, John W. Hupp S.Ed.
Corporation-Officers And Directors-Relationship Between Cumulative Voting And Removal Provisions, John W. Hupp S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Respondent corporation adopted a bylaw providing for removal of a director, with or without cause, by majority vote of the stockholders. The corporation subsequently amended its charter to provide for cumulative voting at all elections of directors. At a meeting of the stockholders and directors, one director was removed without cause by majority vote of the stockholders and another director elected in his place over the objection of petitioner, a minority stockholder owning 40% of the outstanding stock. On petitioner's application to have the election set aside, held, election invalidated and set aside. Adoption of the cumulative voting provision …
Civil Procedure-Right Of Impleader Under Michigan Contribution Statute, W. J. Roper
Civil Procedure-Right Of Impleader Under Michigan Contribution Statute, W. J. Roper
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff, a resident of Michigan, brought a negligence action against defendant, an Illinois corporation, for personal injury in the Federal District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. The defendant moved to implead a citizen of Michigan and a Michigan corporation as third party defendants on the theory that under the Michigan Contribution Statute as concurrent tortfeasors they would be liable to him for part of the judgment in the event that plaintiff recovered in the suit. The court granted the motion and the defendant filed its third party complaint. Plaintiff then moved to dismiss the third party complaint. Held …