Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
Bills And Notes-Warranty Of Qualified Indorser -When Instrument "Valueless"
Bills And Notes-Warranty Of Qualified Indorser -When Instrument "Valueless"
Michigan Law Review
In an action based upon the vendor's warranty in the sale of a note as set forth in the N.I.L., sec. 65 (4), it being alleged that the maker was insolvent and the mortgaged property worth much less than the debt at the time of the transfer of the note and that both such facts were known to the transferor, held, a ruling sustaining a demurrer should be affirmed. Leekley v. Short, (Iowa 1933) 249 N. W. 363.
Appeal And Error - Raising Insufficiency Of Defense For First Time On Appeal
Appeal And Error - Raising Insufficiency Of Defense For First Time On Appeal
Michigan Law Review
In defense to plaintiff's action for wages defendant pleaded facts showing an agreement whereby plaintiff was to accept $4,000 in full satisfaction of her claim. The jury found that no such agreement had been made and rendered a verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $7,500. On appeal by defendant the case was sent back for a new trial because of an error in the admission of evidence offered by plaintiff as to the existence of the alleged agreement. Appellee contended that notwithstanding the error the judgment should be affirmed because the agreement pleaded, even if proved, would not constitute …
Trial Practice - Special Appearance To Contest Garnishment
Trial Practice - Special Appearance To Contest Garnishment
Michigan Law Review
The proceeds of an insurance policy payable to the defendant, a non-resident, were attached by garnishment. The defendant, who was served by publication, filed a paper entitled "Special Appearance" to question the jurisdiction of the court over his person and property. The lower court sustained the special appearance on the ground that the proceeds of the policy were exempt from garnishment. Held, that the exemption of the proceeds was not material to the question of jurisdiction in rem, so it should not have been considered on special appearance. Reversed with leave to the defendant to enter a general …
Automobiles-Licenses-Who Is A Chauffeur
Automobiles-Licenses-Who Is A Chauffeur
Michigan Law Review
In a suit to recover on an insurance policy, defendant sought to establish that the driver of plaintiff's automobile, who worked in plaintiff's plant and drove the delivery truck during the temporary absence of the usual driver, was not a licensed chauffeur as required by statute. Held, that a person who is not paid solely for driving a car but who does so merely as an incident to his regular employment does not come within the provision requiring those persons to obtain licenses who are " . . . known as a chauffeur, and employed for hire therefor . …
Appeal And Error - Application For Separate Trials - Nature Of Order Denying
Appeal And Error - Application For Separate Trials - Nature Of Order Denying
Michigan Law Review
The decedent was riding with his brother as a guest when a collision with another automobile caused his death. The executrix of his estate sued his brother and the driver of the other car jointly. The defendants were suable jointly for their concurring negligences but a statute authorized the court in its discretion to allow separate trials. Upon an appeal from an order overruling an application by the defendants for separate trials the court held that it was an "intermediate order involving the merits or materially affecting the final decision" and thus directly appealable. Manley v. Paysen, (Iowa 1932) …
Wills - Renunciation By The Beneficiary As Affecting The Rights Of His Creditors
Wills - Renunciation By The Beneficiary As Affecting The Rights Of His Creditors
Michigan Law Review
The testator devised to his son an undivided fourth interest in a certain piece of land. The creditors of the son levied on the land, and it was sold at an execution sale. After the execution sale the son formally renounced all his rights under the will. Held, that a beneficiary under a will has the right to renounce unconditionally all benefits derived from the will, and his creditors have no right to object. Lehr v. Switzer, (Iowa 1931) 239 N. W. 564.