Law Commons^™

Are Credit-Card Late Fees "Interest"? Delineating The Preemptive Reach Of Section 85 Of The National Bank Act Of 1864 And Section 521 Of The Depositary Institutions Deregulation And Monetary Control Act Of 1980, Kevin G. Toh

Michigan Law Review

This Note argues that neither section 85 of the NBA nor section 521 of the DIDA preempts state consumer-credit-protection laws regulating late fees on credit-card transactions. Part I discusses the three approaches that the Supreme Court has devised and used over the years to determine when a federal law preempts state law: express preemption, implied preemption, and conflict preemption. Part II applies express preemption analysis and asserts that the ordinary meaning of DIDA section 521's express preemption language does not evince Congress's intent to preempt state prohibitions of late fees. Part III applies implied preemption analysis and argues that neither …