Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Prisons (3)
- Admissibility (2)
- Exclusionary rule (2)
- History (2)
- Mapp v. Ohio (2)
-
- Police (2)
- Prisoners (2)
- Rehabilitation (2)
- Searches (2)
- Seizures (2)
- United States Supreme Court (2)
- Asylums (1)
- California Supreme Court (1)
- Consitutional interpretation (1)
- Crime (1)
- Deterrance (1)
- Detroit (1)
- Gangs (1)
- Gun control (1)
- Mental health (1)
- Michigan (1)
- Minnesota (1)
- New York City (1)
- Police misconduct (1)
- Punishment (1)
- Violence (1)
- Wolf v. Colorado (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Rise Of Prisons And The Origins Of The Rehabilitative Ideal, Carl E. Schneider
The Rise Of Prisons And The Origins Of The Rehabilitative Ideal, Carl E. Schneider
Michigan Law Review
A Review of The Discovery of the Asylum: Social Order and Disorder in the New Republic by David J. Rothman
A Prison And A Prisoner: The Provincial's View, Emily Calhoun
A Prison And A Prisoner: The Provincial's View, Emily Calhoun
Michigan Law Review
A Review of A Prison and a Prisoner by Susan Sheehan
Changed Society, Changing Law, Hence Unstable Prisons, Daniel Glaser
Changed Society, Changing Law, Hence Unstable Prisons, Daniel Glaser
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Stateville: The Penitentiary in Mass Society by James B. Jacobs
The Exclusionary Rule In Historical Perspective: The Struggle To Make The Fourth Amendment More Than 'An Empty Blessing', Yale Kamisar
The Exclusionary Rule In Historical Perspective: The Struggle To Make The Fourth Amendment More Than 'An Empty Blessing', Yale Kamisar
Articles
In the 65 years since the Supreme Court adopted the exclusionary rule, few critics have attacked it with as much vigor and on as many fronts as did Judge Malcolm Wilkey in his recent Judicature article, "The exclusionary rule: why suppress valid evidence?" (November 1978).
Exclusionary Rule: Reasonable Remarks On Unreasonable Search And Seizure, Yale Kamisar
Exclusionary Rule: Reasonable Remarks On Unreasonable Search And Seizure, Yale Kamisar
Articles
Can we live with the so-called exclusionary rule, which bars the use of illegally gained evidence in criminal trials? Can the Fourth Amendment live without it? A growing number of lawyers and judges, including Chief Justice Warren Burger, have called for abandonment of the rule, usually on the ground that it has not prevented illegal searches and seizures and on the ground that the rule has contributed significantly to the increase in crime. No one has convincingly demonstrated a causal link between the high rate of crime in America and the exclusionary rule, and I do not believe that any …