Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Indian tribes (2)
- Native Americans (2)
- Race and law (2)
- Sovereignty (2)
- Alabama (1)
-
- Arts and Crafts Act (1)
- Assiniboine & Sioux Tribes v. Montana (1)
- Bureau of Indian Affairs (1)
- Constitutional violations (1)
- Cultural differences (1)
- Culture (1)
- Definitions (1)
- Discrimination (1)
- Equality (1)
- Federal courts (1)
- Fifteenth Amendment (1)
- Gender and law (1)
- Gender equality (1)
- Gerrymandering (1)
- Gomillion v. Lightfoot (1)
- Governance (1)
- Hawaii (1)
- Intent (1)
- Law and culture (1)
- Native American tribes (1)
- Office of Hawaiian Affairs (1)
- Parens Patriae (1)
- Racial classifications (1)
- Racial discrimination (1)
- Rice v. Cayetano (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Who Is An Indian? Searching For An Answer To The Question At The Core Of Federal Indian Law, Margo S. Brownell
Who Is An Indian? Searching For An Answer To The Question At The Core Of Federal Indian Law, Margo S. Brownell
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
The definition of Indian is the measure of eligibility for a variety of benefits and programs provided to Indians under federal law. There is confusion, however, at the core of efforts to define "Indian." This confusion raises many concerns about the role that government plays in defining "Indian." This Note surveys the most common definitions of "Indian" found in federal statutes, BIA regulations, and state laws. The author argues that the racial basis of many of these laws and regulations are unconstitutional and tread on the sovereignty of Indian tribes. She evaluates efforts of the federal government to avoid these …
Cultural Resistance To Global Governance, Joel Richard Paul
Cultural Resistance To Global Governance, Joel Richard Paul
Michigan Journal of International Law
This article maps out the terrain in which state actors and legal scholars make claims premised on a cultural exception to justify derogating from international legal norms. The author’s aim is to understand why some of these claimed cultural practices displace international legal norms, while other practices are dismissed as violating international legal norms. Part II will examine this discourse in relation to the rights of women and sexual minorities. This article will show that the international community generally regards gender norms as cultural and the international legal norm of gender equality usually defers to national cultural practices. Part III …
Race And The Right To Vote After Rice V. Cayetano, Ellen D. Katz
Race And The Right To Vote After Rice V. Cayetano, Ellen D. Katz
Articles
Last Term, the Supreme Court relied on Gomillion [v. Lightfoot] to hold that Hawaii, like Alabama before it, had segregated voters by race in violation of the Fifteenth Amendment. The state law at issue in Rice v. Cayetano provided that only "Hawaiians" could vote for the trustees of the state's Office of Hawaiian Affairs ("OHA"), a public agency that oversees programs designed to benefit the State's native people. Rice holds that restricting the OHA electorate to descendants of the 1778 inhabitants of the Hawaiian Islands embodied a racial classification that effectively "fenc[ed] out whole classes of ...ci tizens from decisionmaking …
Protecting Native Americans: The Tribe As Parens Patriae, Cami Fraser
Protecting Native Americans: The Tribe As Parens Patriae, Cami Fraser
Michigan Journal of Race and Law
This Note argues that Tribes have parens patriae standing to protect their citizens through litigation on their behalf, even if not all of their citizens are engaged in the litigation. Part I examines the current requirements of parens patriae standing, as articulated by the Supreme Court. Part II briefly examines the nature of tribal sovereignty within American jurisprudence and concludes that parens patriae standing is a retained right of the Tribes. Part III examines the way in which the Federal District Courts have incorrectly handled tribal parens patriae standing. This section argues for a reexamination of Supreme Court doctrine when …