Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Voting (3)
- Elections (2)
- Race and law (2)
- Voting Rights Act (2)
- Affirmative action (1)
-
- Bush Administration (1)
- Colleges and universities (1)
- Cyber security (1)
- Department of Justice (1)
- Discrimination (1)
- Electoral processes (1)
- Fisher v. University of Texas (1)
- Georgia v. Ashcroft (1)
- Gerrymandering (1)
- Grutter v. Bollinger (1)
- Internet (1)
- Law reform (1)
- Obama Administration (1)
- Online voting (1)
- Pre-registration (1)
- Preclearance (1)
- Racial discrimination (1)
- Redistricting (1)
- Remedial regimes (1)
- Technology (1)
- Texas (1)
- Texas v. Holder (1)
- Texas v. United States (1)
- Voter fraud (1)
- Voter identification (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Increasing Youth Participation: The Case For A National Voter Pre-Registration Law, Ceridwen Cherry
Increasing Youth Participation: The Case For A National Voter Pre-Registration Law, Ceridwen Cherry
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Lagging youth participation rates threaten participatory democracy and undermine the representation of young people's interests in elected government. However, the percentage of registered youth who actually cast ballots is very high. The correlation between registration and actual voter participation suggests that when given assistance and greater opportunities to register, young citizens will vote. This Note proposes a national pre-registration law that would allow voter registration to begin at age sixteen. Such a law would be feasible, constitutional, and politically viable and may increase not only the voter participation of young people, but also the socioeconomic diversity of the electorate.
"Like" Your President: A Case For Online Voting, Jeremy Garson
"Like" Your President: A Case For Online Voting, Jeremy Garson
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform Caveat
In the wake of Hurricane Sandy, New Jersey allowed displaced residents to vote in the 2012 elections by email. The option to vote online has been available to military members stationed overseas since 2009. New Jersey’s decision to open online voting to civilians raises the question of why this shift didn’t take place sooner. Assuming New Jersey’s system holds up under post-election scrutiny, why not utilize it to the fullest extent possible? Online voter registration is already permitted by eleven states, including the liberal, infrastructure-rich, population-heavy California and the conservative, sparsely populated Alaska. Extending the registration system to voting itself …
Democrats At Doj: Why Partisan Use Of The Voting Rights Act Might Not Be So Bad After All, Ellen D. Katz
Democrats At Doj: Why Partisan Use Of The Voting Rights Act Might Not Be So Bad After All, Ellen D. Katz
Articles
In notable ways, the ongoing dispute over redistricting in Texas offers a mirror image to one of the major redistricting battles of the last decade, only with Democratic and Republican roles reversed. In both Texas v. United States and Georgia v. Ashcroft, a state attorney general (AG) decided he would not ask the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) to approve new redistricting plans enacted in his state. In both cases, the state AGs were well aware that the Voting Rights Act (VRA) required them to obtain federal approval, known as preclearance, before changing any aspect of their state's election …
On Overreaching, Or Why Rick Perry May Save The Voting Rights Act But Destroy Affirmative Action, Ellen D. Katz
On Overreaching, Or Why Rick Perry May Save The Voting Rights Act But Destroy Affirmative Action, Ellen D. Katz
Articles
The State of Texas is presently staking out two positions that are not typically pursued by a single litigant. On the one hand, Texas is seeking the invalidation of the Voting Rights Act, and, on the other, the State is now defending the validity of the expansive race-based affirmative action policy it uses at its flagship university. This Essay presses the claim that Texas has increased the chance it will lose in bothTexas v. Holder andFisher v. University of Texas because it has opted to stake out markedly extreme positions in each. I argue that Texas would be more likely …