Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- Commonwealth of Kentucky (2)
- Kentucky (2)
- Blacks (1)
- Caponized debtor (1)
- Castaneda v. Partida (1)
-
- Civil rights law (1)
- Commercial (1)
- Commercial law (1)
- Common law (1)
- Common law property (1)
- Community property (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Consumer (1)
- Consumer credit (1)
- Credit (1)
- Creditor (1)
- Damages (1)
- Debtor (1)
- Direct loan transactions (1)
- Discount transactions (1)
- Discrimination (1)
- Discriminatory purpose (1)
- Divorce (1)
- Domestic relations (1)
- Duty (1)
- Emotion distress (1)
- Equal protection clause (1)
- Estate law (1)
- Estates (1)
- FTC (1)
- Publication
Articles 1 - 19 of 19
Full-Text Articles in Law
Cecil Pendleton, By His Next Friend, William F. Gadd V. Pendleton, Et Al., Reply Brief (P) 1972-Sc-0313
Cecil Pendleton, By His Next Friend, William F. Gadd V. Pendleton, Et Al., Reply Brief (P) 1972-Sc-0313
1970-1979
No abstract provided.
Cecil Pendleton, By His Next Friend, William F. Gadd V. Pendleton, Et Al., Petition For Rehearing 1972-Sc-0313
Cecil Pendleton, By His Next Friend, William F. Gadd V. Pendleton, Et Al., Petition For Rehearing 1972-Sc-0313
1970-1979
No abstract provided.
William C. Jacobs V. Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government And Ed Hahn, County Sheriff, Miscellaneous Supplement 1976-Sc-0086
William C. Jacobs V. Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government And Ed Hahn, County Sheriff, Miscellaneous Supplement 1976-Sc-0086
1970-1979
No abstract provided.
Delia G. Belcher, Kathleen V. Lawton And Clay D. Sharp V. Delmas Gish, Individually And As Superintendent Of The Central City Board Of Education, And P.A. Shaver, Jr., William M. Shaver, Marion F. Tinsley, Morris Richey, Dan Carroll, Individually And As Members Of The Central City Board Of Education., Reply Brief (P) 1974-Sc-1118
1970-1979
No abstract provided.
Ingrid Anger Sullivan And John P. Sullivan V. James Levin, Petition For Rehearing 1975-Sc-0712
Ingrid Anger Sullivan And John P. Sullivan V. James Levin, Petition For Rehearing 1975-Sc-0712
1970-1979
No abstract provided.
Delia G. Belcher, Kathleen V. Lawton And Clay D. Sharp V. Delmas Gish, Individually And As Superintendent Of The Central City Board Of Education, And P.A. Shaver, Jr., William M. Shaver, Marion F. Tinsley, Morris Richey, Dan Carroll, Individually And As Members Of The Central City Board Of Education., Petition For Rehearing 1974-Sc-1118
Delia G. Belcher, Kathleen V. Lawton And Clay D. Sharp V. Delmas Gish, Individually And As Superintendent Of The Central City Board Of Education, And P.A. Shaver, Jr., William M. Shaver, Marion F. Tinsley, Morris Richey, Dan Carroll, Individually And As Members Of The Central City Board Of Education., Petition For Rehearing 1974-Sc-1118
1970-1979
No abstract provided.
International Association Of Firefighters, Local 526, Afl-Cio, And Richard Wilson, Et Al V. Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government, Reply Brief (P) 1975-Sc-0529
International Association Of Firefighters, Local 526, Afl-Cio, And Richard Wilson, Et Al V. Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government, Reply Brief (P) 1975-Sc-0529
1970-1979
No abstract provided.
International Association Of Firefighters, Local. 526, Afl-Cio, And Richard Wilson, Et Al V. Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government, Petition For Rehearing 1975-Sc-0440
International Association Of Firefighters, Local. 526, Afl-Cio, And Richard Wilson, Et Al V. Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government, Petition For Rehearing 1975-Sc-0440
1970-1979
No abstract provided.
Dale Allen Baker V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Reply Brief (P) 1976-Sc-0030
Dale Allen Baker V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Reply Brief (P) 1976-Sc-0030
1970-1979
No abstract provided.
Dale Allen Baker V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Petition For Rehearing 1976-Sc-0030
Dale Allen Baker V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Petition For Rehearing 1976-Sc-0030
1970-1979
No abstract provided.
Jean Carter Powell V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Petition For Rehearing 1976-Sc-0475
Jean Carter Powell V. Commonwealth Of Kentucky, Petition For Rehearing 1976-Sc-0475
1970-1979
No abstract provided.
Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Kentucky, Nancy Spiller, Ruby Land, James Evans, Sylvia Hardin, And Earl J. Hilton, Individually And As Representative Of Those Non-Academic Employees Who Not Designated Public Employees Council No. 51 To Represent Them As Their Bargaining Representative V. Public Employees Council No. 51, American Federation Of State, County And Municipal Employees, Afl-Cio, By And Through Robert Kessler, Individually And As Representative Of Said Union, International Representative, Public Employees Council No. 51, American Federation Of State, County And Municipal Employees, Afl-Cio, Richard Kessler, Individually And As Representative Of The Non-Academic Employees Of The University Of Kentucky Who Have Designated Public Employees Council No. 51 As Their Bargaining Representative, James Embry, Individually And As Representative Of The Non-Academic Employees Of The University Of Kentucky Who Have Designated Public Employees Council No. 51 As Their Bargaining Representative, Chester Collier, Individually And As Representative Of The Non-Academic Employees Of The University Of Kentucky Who Have Designated Public Employees Council No. 51 As Their Bargaining Representative, Reply Brief 1976-Sc-0346
1970-1979
No abstract provided.
Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Kentucky, Nancy Spiller, Ruby Land, James Evans, Sylvia Hardin, And Earl J. Hilton, Individually And As Representative Of Those Non-Academic Employees Who Not Designated Public Employees Council No. 51 To Represent Them As Their Bargaining Representative V. Public Employees Council No. 51, American Federation Of State, County And Municipal Employees, Afl-Cio, By And Through Robert Kessler, Individually And As Representative Of Said Union, International Representative, Public Employees Council No. 51, American Federation Of State, County And Municipal Employees, Afl-Cio, Richard Kessler, Individually And As Representative Of The Non-Academic Employees Of The University Of Kentucky Who Have Designated Public Employees Council No. 51 As Their Bargaining Representative, James Embry, Individually And As Representative Of The Non-Academic Employees Of The University Of Kentucky Who Have Designated Public Employees Council No. 51 As Their Bargaining Representative, Chester Collier, Individually And As Representative Of The Non-Academic Employees Of The University Of Kentucky Who Have Designated Public Employees Council No. 51 As Their Bargaining Representative, Miscellaneous Supplement 1976-Sc-0346
1970-1979
No abstract provided.
Suzanne Jett V. John Doe And Kentucky Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co., Other 1973-Sc-1068
Suzanne Jett V. John Doe And Kentucky Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co., Other 1973-Sc-1068
1970-1979
No abstract provided.
Suzanne Jett V. John Doe And Kentucky Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co., Other 1973-Sc-1068
Suzanne Jett V. John Doe And Kentucky Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co., Other 1973-Sc-1068
1970-1979
No abstract provided.
The Uniform Disposition Of Community Property Rights At Death Act, Sarah N. Welling
The Uniform Disposition Of Community Property Rights At Death Act, Sarah N. Welling
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
In 1977, eight of the United States use community property systems instead of the common law systems used in the other 42 states. Because the community property system is totally alien to common law states which do not recognize community interests in property, when domiciliaries of a community property state migrate to a common law state problems develop over the definition of property rights. Two questions usually arise: do the spouses’ rights and interests in the community property change if they move to a common law state? And if not, how are these rights and interests protected? The first question …
Kentucky Law Survey: Commercial Law And Consumer Credit, Harold R. Weinberg
Kentucky Law Survey: Commercial Law And Consumer Credit, Harold R. Weinberg
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
This article is a survey of commercial law and consumer credit in the Commonwealth of Kentucky. The most significant development during the past survey year was the demise of the holder in due course doctrine and other related doctrines which insulated creditors financing consumer sales from consumer claims and defenses. As a result of this development, consumers will now be able to assert claims or defenses arising out of the sale financed against the financer under certain circumstances. Other developments also surveyed herein relate to the Uniform Commercial Code statutes of frauds and prejudgment creditors’ remedies.
Kentucky Law Survey: Torts, Richard C. Ausness
Kentucky Law Survey: Torts, Richard C. Ausness
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
This issue of the Survey of Kentucky tort law includes recent decisions on false imprisonment, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and products liability. The first case, Consolidated Sales Co. v. Malone, held that Kentucky's shoplifter detention statute authorized a personal search of suspected shoplifters by store personnel. In the second case, Eigelbach v. Watts, the Kentucky Supreme Court adhered to its longstanding rule that physical impact was essential to an action for intentional infliction of emotional distress. Finally, in the third decision, McMichael v. American Red Cross, the Court, utilizing the Restatement's “unavoidably unsafe” rationale, refused to impose …
From Washington To Arlington Heights And Beyond: Discriminatory Purpose In Equal Protection Litigation, Robert G. Schwemm
From Washington To Arlington Heights And Beyond: Discriminatory Purpose In Equal Protection Litigation, Robert G. Schwemm
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
When the Supreme Court decided Washington v. Davis on June 7, 1976, it began a new era in civil rights law. Rejecting the contention that state action is unconstitutional solely because it operates to injure more blacks than whites, the Court held that proof of discriminatory purpose is necessary to establish a claim of racial discrimination under the equal protection clause. In two cases decided the following term—Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp. and Castaneda v. Partida—the Court reaffirmed its commitment to the discriminatory purpose requirement, but was badly divided on how to apply the …