Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- SCOTUS (7)
- Judicial (5)
- Ethics (4)
- Federal judge selections (4)
- John Marshall Harlan (4)
-
- Judge (4)
- Judicial selection (4)
- Judiciary (4)
- Kentucky (4)
- Constitution (3)
- Judges (3)
- Judicial misconduct (3)
- Supreme Court (3)
- Circuit court judges (2)
- Commonwealth of Kentucky (2)
- Empirical (2)
- Judicial activism (2)
- Judicial administration (2)
- Judicial decision making (2)
- Judicial elections (2)
- Judicial independence (2)
- Judicial review (2)
- Jury (2)
- Professional ethics (2)
- Professional responsibility (2)
- Removal of federal judges (2)
- Trial (2)
- Voir dire (2)
- 2006 elections (1)
- 3.3 (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 61
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Influence Of The Federalist Society On Judical Politics And Law In The United States, Peter S. K. Lynch
The Influence Of The Federalist Society On Judical Politics And Law In The United States, Peter S. K. Lynch
Theses and Dissertations--Political Science
This dissertation examines the Federalist Society, which is a network of conservative and libertarian attorneys, judges, law professors, and law students. The organization was founded by law students at Harvard Law School, Yale Law School, and the University of Chicago Law School in 1982, and has, over the last four decades, come to play a central role in law and politics in the United States. Individuals affiliated with the Federalist Society influence the law through a variety of avenues.
Federalist Society-members advance the goals of the conservative legal movement in a variety of capacities—by writing amicus curiae briefs providing the …
News Treatment Of The Supreme Court: Language Selection, Ideological Directions, And Public Support, Alexander Denison
News Treatment Of The Supreme Court: Language Selection, Ideological Directions, And Public Support, Alexander Denison
Theses and Dissertations--Political Science
In an increasingly diverse media landscape, how much of the ideological trends seen in current news reporting affect coverage of the U.S. Supreme Court? This work examines two different aspects of the Court's activities, their decisions and the confirmation hearings of Court nominees, analyzing what factors, if any, lead to differences in coverage language. Finally, through the use of a survey experiment, I analyze whether these differences in language, in combination with positive symbolic imagery, affect attitudes toward the institution. This work provides a novel consideration of whether the Court is subject to the same ideological slant found in coverage …
Judicial Elections, Public Opinion, And Their Impact On State Criminal Justice Policy, Travis N. Taylor
Judicial Elections, Public Opinion, And Their Impact On State Criminal Justice Policy, Travis N. Taylor
Theses and Dissertations--Political Science
This dissertation explores whether and how the re-election prospects faced by trial court judges in many American states influence criminal justice policy, specifically, state levels of incarceration, as well as the disparity in rates of incarceration for Whites and Blacks. Do states where trial court judges must worry about facing reelection tend to encourage judicial behavior that results in higher incarceration rates? And are levels of incarceration and racial disparities in the states influenced by the proportion of the state publics who want more punitive policies? These are clearly important questions because they speak directly to several normative and empirical …
Disrobing The Judiciary: The Systematic Stripping Of Judicial Power By The Legislature, Chynna Breann Hibbitts
Disrobing The Judiciary: The Systematic Stripping Of Judicial Power By The Legislature, Chynna Breann Hibbitts
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Outlaws, Pirates, Judges: Judicial Activism As An Expression Of Antiauthoritarianism In Anglo-American Culture, Beau Steenken
Outlaws, Pirates, Judges: Judicial Activism As An Expression Of Antiauthoritarianism In Anglo-American Culture, Beau Steenken
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
This article will argue that the rejection of what scholars otherwise
view as controlling legal authority lies at the heart of judicial activism.
Furthermore, it will argue that judicial activism itself channels the
antiauthoritarian current in American culture (and in English culture
predating its importation to America). Part II will examine the extensive
scholarly writings already existing on judicial activism in order to identify
common themes and to explore to what extent scholars have arrived at a
consensus definition of judicial activism. Part III will then show that
judicial activism may better be understood within the context of law as …
Blurring Institutional Boundaries: Judges' Perceptions Of Threats To Judicial Independence, Alyx Mark, Michael A. Zilis
Blurring Institutional Boundaries: Judges' Perceptions Of Threats To Judicial Independence, Alyx Mark, Michael A. Zilis
Political Science Faculty Publications
The legislature wields multiple tools to limit judicial power, but scholars have little information about how judges interpret variant threats and which they find most concerning. To provide insight, we conduct original interviews regarding legislative threats to courts with over two dozen sitting federal judges, representing all tiers of the federal judiciary. We find that judges have a nuanced understanding of threats and tend to identify components of legislative proposals that threaten formal institutional powers as more concerning than those challenging policy set by judges. This distinction has broad implications for our understanding of judicial behavior at the federal level.
Justice Holmes's Bad Man And The Depleted Purposes Of Punitive Damages, Jill Wieber Lens
Justice Holmes's Bad Man And The Depleted Purposes Of Punitive Damages, Jill Wieber Lens
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
“Testing” Fuller’S Forms And Limits: A Brief Response To Oldfather, Bockhorst, & Dimmer, Scott R. Bauries
“Testing” Fuller’S Forms And Limits: A Brief Response To Oldfather, Bockhorst, & Dimmer, Scott R. Bauries
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
In Triangulating Judicial Responsiveness, Chad Oldfather, Joseph Bockhorst, and Brian Dimmer give us a methodology by which we can empirically assess (among other things) the effects that argumentation has on judicial decision making. Unlike the vast majority of empirical legal scholarship of judging, the authors do not use this methodology in their current study to compare “legalist” explanations of judging with “realist” explanations of judging. Rather, the study operates almost entirely within the “legalist” frame. This is a welcome development for many reasons, one on which this Response focuses—the authors’ methodology illustrates a way of scientifically “testing” descriptive legal …
Making Stuff Up, Richard H. Underwood
Making Stuff Up, Richard H. Underwood
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
Beginning with an article in this Journal almost thirty years ago, Professor Underwood continues to research and write about legal ethics and litigation. In this Commentary, he offers a witty look at several cases where, in his opinion, the judge allowed improper arguments to the jury.
Putting The Mice In Charge Of The Cheese: Why Federal Judges Cannot Always Be Trusted To Police Themselves And What Congress Can Do About It, Lara A. Bazelon
Putting The Mice In Charge Of The Cheese: Why Federal Judges Cannot Always Be Trusted To Police Themselves And What Congress Can Do About It, Lara A. Bazelon
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Kentucky 2006 Judicial Elections, William H. Fortune, Al Cross
Kentucky 2006 Judicial Elections, William H. Fortune, Al Cross
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
This Article is a short report on the impact of Republican Party of Minnesota v. White on the 2006 Kentucky judicial campaigns and elections. The series of events leading up to the 2006 elections can be traced to at least 1988.
While the Kentucky Judicial Campaign Conduct Committee (KJCCC) cannot claim a great impact on Kentucky's 2006 judicial elections, the authors of this Article believe that the committee played a positive role. For the most part, judicial candidates campaigned in a dignified and ethical manner, and refrained from running on issues that might strike a chord with the electorate. Judicial …
What Gets Judges In Trouble, Richard H. Underwood
What Gets Judges In Trouble, Richard H. Underwood
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
I wrote this article to collect some cautionary material about “what gets judges in trouble.” I wanted something I could offer to our state judges, practitioners, and my legal ethics students. While I have never been a judge, and while I have never worked for a judicial conduct organization, I have been a law professor for almost twenty-five years and the chairman of a state bar association ethics committee for fourteen. I am not the kind of person who would refrain from holding forth just because I may not know what I am talking about.
When I started out, I …
Democracy, Not Deference: An Egalitarian Theory Of Judicial Review, Ronald C. Den Otter
Democracy, Not Deference: An Egalitarian Theory Of Judicial Review, Ronald C. Den Otter
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Judging And Democracy, Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain
Judging And Democracy, Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Judicial Independence: Rebuffing Congressional Attacks On The Third Branch, Stephan O. Kline
Judicial Independence: Rebuffing Congressional Attacks On The Third Branch, Stephan O. Kline
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
A Proposal To Require Lawyers To Disclose Information About Procedural Matters, William H. Fortune
A Proposal To Require Lawyers To Disclose Information About Procedural Matters, William H. Fortune
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
In the absence of a rule clearly requiring disclosure, a lawyer is obligated not to disclose information which is adverse to the interests of a client. However, judges should be able to expect lawyers to disclose information about procedural matters. This Article argues that Model Rule of Professional Conduct 3.3 should be amended to require disclosure of information about procedural matters. Part I describes the events in Potter v. Eli Lilly & Co., a case involving a secret settlement related to Prozac. Part II makes the argument for a rule requiring disclosure of procedural information. Part III describes how …
The Evolution Of Chutzpah As A Legal Term: The Chutzpah Championship, Chutzpah Award, Chutzpah Doctrine, And Now, The Supreme Court, Jack Achiezer Guggenheim
The Evolution Of Chutzpah As A Legal Term: The Chutzpah Championship, Chutzpah Award, Chutzpah Doctrine, And Now, The Supreme Court, Jack Achiezer Guggenheim
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Textualism's Selective Canons Of Statutory Construction: Reinvigorating Individual Liberties, Legislative Authority, And Deference To Executive Agencies, Bradford C. Mank
Textualism's Selective Canons Of Statutory Construction: Reinvigorating Individual Liberties, Legislative Authority, And Deference To Executive Agencies, Bradford C. Mank
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Tribute To Justice Charles M. Leibson, Robert F. Stephens
Tribute To Justice Charles M. Leibson, Robert F. Stephens
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Tribute To Justice Charles H. Reynolds, Brian Pack
Tribute To Justice Charles H. Reynolds, Brian Pack
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Mr. Justice Frankfurter's Iconography Of Judging, Alfred S. Neely
Mr. Justice Frankfurter's Iconography Of Judging, Alfred S. Neely
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Justice Antonin Scalia And Criminal Justice Cases, Christopher E. Smith
Justice Antonin Scalia And Criminal Justice Cases, Christopher E. Smith
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
"I Vote This Way Because I'M Wrong": The Supreme Court Justice As Epimenides, John M. Rogers
"I Vote This Way Because I'M Wrong": The Supreme Court Justice As Epimenides, John M. Rogers
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
Possibly the most unsettling phenomenon in the Supreme Court's 1988 term was Justice White's decision to vote contrary to his own exhaustively stated reasoning in Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co. His unexplained decision to vote against the result of his own analysis lends support to those who argue that law, or at least constitutional law, is fundamentally indeterminate. Proponents of the indeterminacy argument sometimes base their position on the allegedly inescapable inconsistency of decisions made by a multi-member court. There is an answer to the inconsistency argument, but it founders if justices sometimes vote, without explanation, on the basis of …
Commentary On State Selection Of Judges, Robert F. Stephens
Commentary On State Selection Of Judges, Robert F. Stephens
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Independence Of The Judiciary: A Critical Aspect Of The Confirmation Process, Randall R. Rader
The Independence Of The Judiciary: A Critical Aspect Of The Confirmation Process, Randall R. Rader
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Judicial Selection In Context: The American And English Experience, Burton Atkins
Judicial Selection In Context: The American And English Experience, Burton Atkins
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Commentary On Selecting Federal Judges, J. Woodford Howard Jr.
Commentary On Selecting Federal Judges, J. Woodford Howard Jr.
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Commentary On Selecting Federal Judges, Barbara Lewis
Commentary On Selecting Federal Judges, Barbara Lewis
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Commentary On Selecting Federal Judges, Thomas G. Walker
Commentary On Selecting Federal Judges, Thomas G. Walker
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Voters' Information In Judicial Elections: The 1986 Contests For The Ohio Supreme Court, Lawrence Baum
Voters' Information In Judicial Elections: The 1986 Contests For The Ohio Supreme Court, Lawrence Baum
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.