Law Commons^™

The Law Of Vertical Integration And The Business Firm, 1880-1960, Herbert Hovenkamp

Herbert Hovenkamp

ABSTRACT

Vertical integration occurs when a firm does something for itself that it could otherwise procure on the market. For example, a manufacturer that opens its own stores is said to be vertically integrated into distribution. Both classical political economy and marginalist economics saw vertical integration and vertical contractual arrangements as much less threatening to competition than cartels or other horizontal arrangements. Nevertheless, vertical integration produced by far the greater amount of legislation at both federal and state levels and motivated many more political action groups. Two things explain this phenomenon. First, while economists prior to the 1930s rarely saw …

Copyright Harm And The First Amendment, Christina Bohannan

Christina Bohannan

Abstract Copyright law is a glaring and unjustified exception to the general rule that the government may not prohibit speech without a showing that the speech causes harm. While the First Amendment sometimes protects even harmful speech, it virtually never allows the prohibition of harmless speech. Yet, while other speech-burdening laws, such as defamation and right of publicity laws, require demonstrable evidence that the defendant’s speech causes actual harm, copyright law does not make harm a requirement of infringement. Although copyright law considers harm to the market for the copyrighted work as a factor in fair use analysis, harm is …

The Coase Theorem And Arthur Cecil Pigou, Herbert Hovenkamp

Herbert Hovenkamp

In “The Problem of Social Cost” Ronald Coase was highly critical of the work of Cambridge University Economics Professor Arthur Cecil Pigou, presenting him as a radical government interventionist. In later work Coase’s critique of Pigou became even more strident. In fact, however, Pigou’s Economics of Welfare created the basic model and many of the tools that Coase’s later work employed. Much of what we today characterize as the “Coase Theorem” was either stated or anticipated in Pigou’s work. Further, Coase’s extreme faith in private bargaining led him to fail to see problems that Pigou saw quite clearly and that …

Complex Bundled Discounts And Antitrust Policy, Herbert Hovenkamp

Herbert Hovenkamp

COMPLEX BUNDLED DISCOUNTS AND ANTITRUST POLICY

ABSTRACT

A bundled discount occurs when a seller conditions a discount or rebate on the buyer’s purchaser or two or more different products. Firms that produce fewer than all the good in the bundle find it difficult to compete because they must amortize the discount across a smaller range of goods. For example, if the dominant firm offers a 10% discount for purchase of both good A and good B, but the rival makes only good B, it will have to offer a discount that is large enough to match the dominant firm’s B …

United States Competition Policy In Crisis, 1890-1955, Herbert Hovenkamp

Herbert Hovenkamp

UNITED STATES COMPETITION POLICY IN CRISIS,1890-1955 Herbert Hovenkamp ABSTRACT The development of marginalist, or neoclassical, economics led to a fifty-year long crisis in competition theory. Given an industrial structure with sufficient fixed costs, competition always became "ruinous," forcing firms to cut prices to marginal cost without sufficient revenue remaining to pay off investment. Early neoclassicists such as Alfred Marshall were not able to solve this problem, and as a result many economists were hostile toward the antitrust laws in the early decades of the twentieth century. The ruinous competition debate came to an abrupt end in the early 1930's, when …

The Economics Of Deal Risk: Allocating Risk Through Mac Clauses In Business Combination Agreements, Robert T. Miller

Robert T Miller

In any large corporate acquisition, there is a delay between the time the parties enter into a merger agreement (the signing) and the time the merger is effected and the purchase price paid (the closing). During this period, the business of one of the parties may deteriorate. When this happens to a target company in a cash deal, or to either party in a stock-for-stock deal, the counterparty may no longer want to consummate the transaction. The primary contractual protection parties have in such situations is the merger agreement’s “material adverse change” (MAC) clause. Such clauses are heavily negotiated and …

Canceling The Deal: Two Models Of Material Adverse Change Clauses In Business Combination Agreements, Robert T. Miller

Robert T Miller

In any large corporate acquisition, there is a delay between the time the parties enter into a merger agreement (the signing) and the time the merger is effected and the purchase price paid (the closing). During this period, the business of one of the parties may deteriorate. When this happens to a target company in a cash deal or to either party in a stock deal, the counterparty may no longer want to consummate the transaction. Merger agreements typically protect counterparties against this risk through “material adverse change” (MAC) clauses, which permit the counterparty to cancel the deal if the …

Morals In A Market Bubble, Robert T. Miller

Robert T Miller

In this short piece, I respond to the idea that the financial crisis of 2007-2008 was caused by a frenzy of immoral practices in the real estate and financial markets. I argue that such a theory is fundamentally misguided. In reality, the Federal Reserve’s unduly accommodating monetary policy in 2002-2006 and certain structural features of the relevant financial markets (especially subprime loans) combined to produce the bubble in the residential real estate market in the United States. This happened not because of moral wrongdoing by market participants but as a result of individuals rationally pursuing their economic self-interest (a) in …

Hexion V. Huntsman: Elaborating The Delaware Mac Standard, Robert T. Miller

Robert T Miller

No abstract provided.

Copyright Harm And The First Amendment, Christina Bohannan

Christina Bohannan

Abstract Copyright law is a glaring and unjustified exception to the general rule that the government may not prohibit speech without a showing that the speech causes harm. While the First Amendment sometimes protects even harmful speech, it virtually never allows the prohibition of harmless speech. Yet, while other speech-burdening laws, such as defamation and right of publicity laws, require demonstrable evidence that the defendant’s speech causes actual harm, copyright law does not make harm a requirement of infringement. Although copyright law considers harm to the market for the copyrighted work as a factor in fair use analysis, harm is …