Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (3)
- Administrative Law (2)
- Animal Law (2)
- Biodiversity (2)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (2)
-
- Climate (2)
- Constitutional Law (2)
- Courts (2)
- Energy Policy (2)
- Energy and Utilities Law (2)
- Environmental Law (2)
- Environmental Policy (2)
- Environmental Sciences (2)
- Forest Management (2)
- Forest Sciences (2)
- Jurisdiction (2)
- Labor and Employment Law (2)
- Land Use Law (2)
- Law and Society (2)
- Legal Education (2)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (2)
- Life Sciences (2)
- Natural Resource Economics (2)
- Natural Resources Law (2)
- Natural Resources Management and Policy (2)
- Natural Resources and Conservation (2)
- Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology (2)
- Oil, Gas, and Energy (2)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Role Of Case Studies In Natural Resources Law [Summary], John Copeland Nagle
The Role Of Case Studies In Natural Resources Law [Summary], John Copeland Nagle
The Future of Natural Resources Law and Policy (Summer Conference, June 6-8)
4 pages.
"John Nagle, Univ. of Notre Dame Law School" -- Agenda
Slides: Meaningful Engagement: The Public's Role In Resource Decisions, Mark Squillace
Slides: Meaningful Engagement: The Public's Role In Resource Decisions, Mark Squillace
The Future of Natural Resources Law and Policy (Summer Conference, June 6-8)
Presenter: Mark Squillace, Director, Natural Resources Law Center, University of Colorado Law School
22 slides
Disparate Impact Discrimination: The Limits Of Litigation, The Possibilities For Internal Compliance, Melissa Hart
Disparate Impact Discrimination: The Limits Of Litigation, The Possibilities For Internal Compliance, Melissa Hart
Publications
No abstract provided.
Fighting Discrimination While Fighting Litigation: A Tale Of Two Supreme Courts, Scott A. Moss
Fighting Discrimination While Fighting Litigation: A Tale Of Two Supreme Courts, Scott A. Moss
Publications
The U.S. Supreme Court has issued an odd mix of pro-plaintiff and pro-defendant employment law rulings. It has disallowed harassment lawsuits against employers even with failed antiharassment efforts, construed statutes of limitations narrowly to bar suits about ongoing promotion and pay discrimination, and denied protection to public employee internal complaints. Yet the same Court has issued significant unanimous rulings easing discrimination plaintiffs' burdens of proof.
This jurisprudence is often miscast in simple pro-plaintiff or pro-defendant terms. The Court's duality traces to its inconsistent and unaware adoption of competing policy arguments:
Policy 1: Employees must try internal dispute resolution before suing--or …