Law Commons^™

Symposium Dialogue: Keynote Speaker Senator Barbara Mikulski, Barbara Mikulski

University of Baltimore Law Review

MODERATED BY PROFESSOR MARGARET E. JOHNSON

The following is an adaptation of the Dialogue that took place on the campus of the University of Baltimore School of Law during the 2012 Applied Feminism and Democracy: 2012 Feminist Legal Theory Conference, on March 2, 2012. In an effort to present this dialogue in an academically appealing manner, minor formatting and grammatical adaptations were made, while maintaining the substance of the Dialogue. -EDS.

Location, Location, Location: Balancing Crime Fighting Needs And Privacy Rights, Nancy K. Oliver

University of Baltimore Law Review

No abstract provided.

Research And Reality: Better Understanding The Debate Between Sequential And Simultaneous Photo Arrays, Frederick H. Bealefeld Iii

University of Baltimore Law Review

No abstract provided.

Why Dna Databasing Is Good For Maryland — A Dna Analyst's Perspective, Rana Santos

University of Baltimore Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Imperative Of Eyewitness Identification Reform And The Role Of Police Leadership, Rebecca Brown, Stephen Saloom

University of Baltimore Law Review

No abstract provided.

Reflections On Vawa's Strange Bedfellows: The Partnership Between The Battered Immigrant Women's Movement And Law Enforcement, Alizabeth Newman

University of Baltimore Law Review

No abstract provided.

University Of Baltimore Law Review Volume 42 Number 3 (Spring 2013) Front Matter

University of Baltimore Law Review

No abstract provided.

Luogo E Spazio, Place And Space: Gender Quotas And Democracy In Italy, Rachel A. Van Cleave

University of Baltimore Law Review

No abstract provided.

Symposium Foreword: Privacy Rights And Proactive Investigations: Emerging Constitutional Issues In Law Enforcement, Thiru Vignarajah

University of Baltimore Law Review

No abstract provided.

Beyond A Beautiful Fraud: Using A Human Rights Framework To Realize The Promise Of Democracy, Janel A. George

University of Baltimore Law Review

"[Politics] is a beautiful fraud that has been imposed on the people for years . . ."

-The late Honorable Shirley Chisholm'

Back To The Future: United States V Jones Resuscitates Property Law Concepts In Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence, Nancy Forster

University of Baltimore Law Review

No abstract provided.

University Of Baltimore Law Review Volume 42 Number 4 (Summer 2013) Front Matter

University of Baltimore Law Review

No abstract provided.

Indecent Exposure: Genes Are More Than A Brand Name Label In The Dna Database Debate, Jessica D. Gabel

University of Baltimore Law Review

No abstract provided.

Symposium Foreword: Applied Feminism And Democracy

University of Baltimore Law Review

No abstract provided.

Legislative Oppression: Restricting Gestational Surrogacy To Married Couples Is An Attempt To Legislate Morality, Linda S. Anderson

University of Baltimore Law Review

Since the days of Baby M, surrogacy arrangements have become a well-accepted form of assisted reproduction. As one of the first alternatives available to those who could not create families naturally, surrogacy arrangements have been scrutinized and discussed from a variety of angles. Today, state laws determine whether surrogacy is allowed, establish the standards for the agreements and qualifications of those who use this form of family creation, and set limits on payments involved in such arrangements. Many states that regulate surrogacy through legislation have restricted the availability of surrogacy arrangements to married couples, thereby eliminating any non-traditional heterosexual couples, …

Post-Jones: How District Courts Are Answering The Myriad Questions Raised By The Supreme Court's Decision In United States V. Jones, Jason D. Medinger

University of Baltimore Law Review

No abstract provided.

Comments: Liberalizing Maryland's Approach To Piercing The Corporate Veil, Ryan Bottegal

University of Baltimore Law Review

No abstract provided.

University Of Baltimore Law Review Volume 42 Number 2 (Winter 2013) Front Matter

University of Baltimore Law Review

No abstract provided.

Referenda In Maryland: The Need For Comprehensive Statutory Reform, Michael D. Berman, Melissa O'Toole-Loureiro

University of Baltimore Law Review

No abstract provided.

Comment: The Case Of Two Biological Intended Mothers: Illustrating The Need To Statutorily Define Maternity In Maryland, Catherine Villareale

University of Baltimore Law Review

Sam was born a happy and healthy baby boy, much to the delight of his mothers, Sarah and Jen. Although Jen gave birth to Sam, Jen has no genetic connection to her son. Biologically, Sarah is Sam's "ova mother"' because Sam was conceived through assisted reproductive technology using Sarah's ovum that was fertilized in vitro by an anonymous sperm donor and implanted in Jen. Both Sarah and Jen share a biological connection to Sam, Sarah through DNA and Jen through carrying him for nine months and giving birth. Consequently, Sam has two biological mothers. Yet, in Maryland, at the time …

Comments: The Hidden Cost Of Rod And Rifle: Why State Fish And Game Laws Must Be Amended In Order To Protect Against Unreasonable Search And Seizure In The Great Outdoors, Bryan M. Mull

University of Baltimore Law Review

No abstract provided.

Comments: Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging And The Law Today: The Brain Is Reliable As A Mitigating Factor, But Unreliable As An Aggravating Factor Or As A Method Of Lie Detection, Kristina E. Donahue

University of Baltimore Law Review

No abstract provided.