Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- First Amendment (13)
- Free speech (6)
- Branzburg v. Hayes (5)
- Constitutional law (5)
- First amendment (5)
-
- Reporter's privilege (5)
- Establishment Clause (4)
- Freedom of speech (3)
- Freedom of the press (3)
- Religion (3)
- Shield laws (3)
- Anonymity (2)
- Arkansas Freedom of Information Act (2)
- Constitutional Law (2)
- Disclosure (2)
- Doe v. Pulaski County Special School District (2)
- Elections (2)
- Establishment clause (2)
- FOIA (2)
- Free press (2)
- Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) (2)
- McKevitt v. Pallasch (2)
- Political speech (2)
- Pornography; myths and realities of pornography; adult entertainment; First Amendment; regulation of pornography; constitutional standard on obscenity; radical feminist view of pornography; current pornography market; sexually explicit speech (2)
- Prayer (2)
- Special privilege (2)
- Supreme court (2)
- Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (2)
- " Morse v. Frederick (1)
- "Announce Clause" (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 67
Full-Text Articles in Law
Nobody's Business: A Novel Theory Of The Anonymous First Amendment, Jordan Wallace-Wolf
Nobody's Business: A Novel Theory Of The Anonymous First Amendment, Jordan Wallace-Wolf
Faculty Scholarship
Namelessness is a double-edged sword. It can be a way of avoiding prejudice and focusing attention on one's ideas, but it can also be a license to defame and misinform. These points have been widely discussed. Still, the breadth of these discussions has left some of the depths unplumbed, because rarely is the question explicitly faced: what is the normative significance of namelessness itself, as opposed to its effects under different conditions? My answer is that anonymity is an evasion of responsibility for one's conduct. Persons should ordinarily be held responsible for what they do, but in some cases, where …
Fulton V. City Of Philadelphia, And The Rights Of Faith-Based Adoption And Foster Care Agencies, William G. Mcgrath
Fulton V. City Of Philadelphia, And The Rights Of Faith-Based Adoption And Foster Care Agencies, William G. Mcgrath
The Arkansas Journal of Social Change and Public Service
No abstract provided.
Section 230 Immunity: How The Trump Era Has Exposed The Current Conflict Between The First Amendment And The Good Samaritan Clause In The Modern Public Square, Brandon Salter, Dhillon Ramkhelawn
Section 230 Immunity: How The Trump Era Has Exposed The Current Conflict Between The First Amendment And The Good Samaritan Clause In The Modern Public Square, Brandon Salter, Dhillon Ramkhelawn
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law—The Erosion Of Political Anonymity And Its Chilling Effect On Freedom Of Association: Reconsidering The Constitutionality Of The Mandated Public Disclosure Of Individuals’ Political Donations, Scout Snowden
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law—Where Does It Fit? Solving The School Board Prayer Puzzle, Austin Reed
Constitutional Law—Where Does It Fit? Solving The School Board Prayer Puzzle, Austin Reed
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Reflections On The Church/State Puzzle, Kermit V. Lipez
Reflections On The Church/State Puzzle, Kermit V. Lipez
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
A Penny For Your Thoughts: Free Speech And Paying Fines With Coins, Peter C. Alexander
A Penny For Your Thoughts: Free Speech And Paying Fines With Coins, Peter C. Alexander
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law—Why Amending The Consitution To Overrule Citizens United Is The Wrong Way To Fix Campaign Finance In The United States, Zachary Hale
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
The First Amendment And The Police In The Digital Age, Kermit V. Lipez
The First Amendment And The Police In The Digital Age, Kermit V. Lipez
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Dissecting The Hybrid Rights Exception: Should It Be Expanded Or Rejected?, David H. Hudson Jr., Emily H. Harvey
Dissecting The Hybrid Rights Exception: Should It Be Expanded Or Rejected?, David H. Hudson Jr., Emily H. Harvey
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
George Washington. Elena Kagan, And The Town Of Greece, New York: The First Amendment And Religious Minorities, Kermit V. Lipez
George Washington. Elena Kagan, And The Town Of Greece, New York: The First Amendment And Religious Minorities, Kermit V. Lipez
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law—First Amendment—Social Media Rams The Tinker Schoolhouse Gate: A New Approach For Online Student Speech, S. Kate Fletcher
Constitutional Law—First Amendment—Social Media Rams The Tinker Schoolhouse Gate: A New Approach For Online Student Speech, S. Kate Fletcher
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law—First Amendment And Freedom Of Speech—The Constitutionality Of Arkansas’S Prohibition On Political Robocalls, Caleb J. Norris
Constitutional Law—First Amendment And Freedom Of Speech—The Constitutionality Of Arkansas’S Prohibition On Political Robocalls, Caleb J. Norris
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
The note first discusses the pros and cons of robocalls, concluding that certain restrictions on robocalls are desirable. Next, the note examines current constitutional case law governing the issue. Thereafter, the note illustrates how Arkansas's regulation on political robocalls would fail a First Amendment challenge as currently written. Accordingly, the note proposes a revision to the robocall statute that would most likely allow it to pass constitutional review.
The note concludes that the burdens resulting from robocalls are placed upon robocall recipients, opposing political campaigns (especially those that determine not to use them under current law), and unrelated third parties. …
A Proposal To Expand The Religious Services Exemption Under The Copyright Act, Kevin M. Lemley
A Proposal To Expand The Religious Services Exemption Under The Copyright Act, Kevin M. Lemley
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
This article focuses on the religious services exemption to the Copyright Act. The religious services exemption is one of many exemptions that permit certain types of use without first obtaining permission from the copyright owner, or proving fair use. This article argues that the religious services exemption should be expanded to cover any work used in the course of services as well as the recording, broadcast, and transmission of the services.
The first part of this article analyzes the existing religious services exemption under the Copyright Act to define the bounds that uses fall under the exemption. The article then …
State Government—The Arkansas Freedom Of Information Act—Public Or Private Record: A Simple Distinction Threatens The Future Of Open Government In Arkansas, Pulaski County V. Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Inc., 371 Ark. 214, 264 S.W.3d 465 (Ark. Oct. 4, 2007)., Geoffrey D. Neal
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law—First Amendment & Freedom Of Speech—Students May Be Regarded As Closed-Circuit Recipients Of The State's Anti Drug Message: The Supreme Court Creates A New Exception To The Tinker Student Speech Standard. Morse V. Frederick, 127 S. Ct. 2618 (2007), Megan D. Hargraves
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
This note argues that the Supreme Court's decision in Morse significantly weakens students' free speech rights. Although the Court stated that students "do not shed their constitutional rights at the school house gates," its decisions, in effect, weakens Tinker's important holding that students are entitled to First Amendment protection. The note asserts that the Court's opinion broadens schools' authority to regulate student speech in ways that are contrary to fundamental First Amendment values and explicitly allows schools to engage in highly suspect viewpoint discrimination.
The note first examines some of the fundamental First Amendment values at stake in student speech …
Shifting Out Of Neutral: Intelligent Design And The Road To Nonpreferentialism, Kelly S. Terry
Shifting Out Of Neutral: Intelligent Design And The Road To Nonpreferentialism, Kelly S. Terry
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law—Campaign Finance Law & The First Amendment—Can You See The Light?: Illuminating Precedent And Creating A New Tier Of Judicial Scrutiny For Campaign Finance Laws. Randall V. Sorrell, 126 S. Ct. 2479 (2006)., Christopher A. Mcnulty
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Reporter's Privilege In Arkansas: An Overview With Commentary, Philip S. Anderson
The Reporter's Privilege In Arkansas: An Overview With Commentary, Philip S. Anderson
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Do Not Pass Go, Do Not Collect $200: The Reporter's Privilege Today, Douglas E. Lee
Do Not Pass Go, Do Not Collect $200: The Reporter's Privilege Today, Douglas E. Lee
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Déjà Vu All Over Again: How A Generation Of Gains In The Federal Reporter's Privilege Law Is Being Reversed, Lucy A. Dalglish, Casey Murray
Déjà Vu All Over Again: How A Generation Of Gains In The Federal Reporter's Privilege Law Is Being Reversed, Lucy A. Dalglish, Casey Murray
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Concerto The Without Sheet Music: Revisiting The Debate Over First Amendment Protection For Information Gathering, Anthony L. Fargo
The Concerto The Without Sheet Music: Revisiting The Debate Over First Amendment Protection For Information Gathering, Anthony L. Fargo
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Trial Judge's Rumination On The Reporter's Privilege, Susan Webber Wright
A Trial Judge's Rumination On The Reporter's Privilege, Susan Webber Wright
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Regulating Food Advertisements: Some First Amendment Issues, John M. A. Dipippa
Regulating Food Advertisements: Some First Amendment Issues, John M. A. Dipippa
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Arkansas’S Public Records Retention Program: Records Retention As A Cornerstone Of Citizenship And Self-Government, Richard J. Peltz
Arkansas’S Public Records Retention Program: Records Retention As A Cornerstone Of Citizenship And Self-Government, Richard J. Peltz
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law—First Amendment And Freedom Of Thought—Banishing Sex Offenders: Seventh Circuit Upholds Sex Offender's Ban From Public Parks After Thinking Obscene Thoughts About Children. Doe V. City Of Lafayette, 377 F.3d 757 (7th Cir. 2004)., Elizabeth Cloud
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Richard Sheppard Arnold: A Distinguished Jurist, A Loyal Colleague And A Good Friend, Gerald W. Heaney
Richard Sheppard Arnold: A Distinguished Jurist, A Loyal Colleague And A Good Friend, Gerald W. Heaney
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law—True Threat Doctrine And Public School Speech—An Expensive View Of A School's Authority To Discipline Allegedly Threatening Student Speech Arising Off Campus. Doe V. Pulaski County Special School District, 306 F.3d 616 (8th Cir. 2002)., William Bird
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Republican Party Of Minnesota V. White: The Lifting Of Judicial Speech Restraint, David B. Bogard
Republican Party Of Minnesota V. White: The Lifting Of Judicial Speech Restraint, David B. Bogard
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law—First Amendment And Freedom Of Speech—"It's Ok—She's A Pixel, Not A Pixie": The First Amendment Protects Virtual Child Pornography. Ashcroft V. Free Speech Coalition, 535 U.S. 234 (2002)., Gary D. Marts Jr.
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.