Law Commons^™

Obligation Of The Judge To Arbitrament: Analytical Study In Light Of The Provisions Of The French Law, The Opinions Of Jurisprudence, And The Decisions Of The Judiciary, Ali Abdul Hameed Turki

UAEU Law Journal

The study in this present research work has been concentrated on handling the subject of obligation of the judge to arbitrament (i.e. settle a dispute) within the frame of the texts of the French Law, the opinions of Jurisprudence, and the decisions of the Judiciary.

It aims determine the party who is dominating over the determination of the facts of the dispute, and to know who shall assume the establishment of such facts, and what is the scope of the obligation of the Judge for the determination in the dispute

Beating The Accused In Islamic Jurisprudence (Comparative Study), Mai’N Abu Baker Al Saud, Maher Haswa

UAEU Law Journal

This research is an attempt to examine the legality of beating the accused - who is indicated by the evidence of the charge, or known of committing such types of these crimes , - in order to reach the truth , only in case of the misleading information or the judge could not know the truth without this procedure. This research has dealt with the subject of study in three sections , with the first devoted to talk about the definition of the term charge and the charge and the kinds and types of defendants in an attempt to limit …

The Authority Of The Court To Use The Most Practical Evidence In The Private International Law: A Comparative Study", Dr. Yasser Bassem Al-Sabawi, Khalil Ibrahim Mohammed

UAEU Law Journal

The importance of the theory of Evidence in presenting the dispute to the judiciary is evident, where the judge has to apply the rules of evidence. If the theory of Evidence is one of the most important and practical theories in the working life at the courts, it is the theory applied by the courts every day at the level of the internal laws. A right whose source can not be proven whether legal or legal fact, is worthless.

It is even more important when examining the issue of evidence in private international law, in particular the question of acceptance …

Amending The Constitution Through Judicial Interpretation: A Comparative Study, Dr. Essam Saeed Obeidi

UAEU Law Journal

The Constitution is amended in two ways: the first is official following the procedures provided for in the Constitution, and the second is an informal amendment of the Constitution without following the formal procedures provided for in the constitutional document. Among the informal methods of amending the Constitution is the judicial interpretation where the constitutional judge exploits of the generality of the constitutional texts and their ambiguity and shortcomings in order to modify their meaning while keeping the form of the word unchanged by adding new meanings or replacing the existing meaning with a new meaning , The Constitutional Judge …