Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Dobbs (2)
- Legitimacy (2)
- Supreme Court (2)
- Abortion (1)
- Accountability (1)
-
- Apartheid (1)
- Armenian genocide (1)
- Assessments (1)
- Assyrian genocide (1)
- Blood money (1)
- Boddery (1)
- CNN (1)
- Caudill (1)
- Christina Glekas (1)
- Confirmation process (1)
- Congress (1)
- Glekas (1)
- Greek genocide (1)
- Heuristic (1)
- Houston (1)
- ICC Nuremburg trials (1)
- Identity politics (1)
- Institutional legitimacy (1)
- International Criminal Court (1)
- Jeffrey Yates (1)
- Judicial reparations (1)
- Laura Moyer (1)
- League of Nations (1)
- Lindsay Caudill (1)
- Media outlets (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Sounding The Legitimacy Alarm Bell: When Does The Media Discuss The U.S. Supreme Court’S Legitimacy?, Rachael Houston
Sounding The Legitimacy Alarm Bell: When Does The Media Discuss The U.S. Supreme Court’S Legitimacy?, Rachael Houston
Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity
These media outlets cover the Court in such ways because they openly promote a particular political ideology through endorsements, donations, ownership, or slant in coverage. They cater to audiences with similar political beliefs and tailor their coverage accordingly. For example, Fox News was created by Rupert Murdoch to appeal to a conservative audience. So, its content is purposefully conservative and assessed as right-leaning by media bias charts. As a result, polling data reveals that Republicans trust Fox News more than any other outlet. At the same time, Robert “Ted” Turner, the founder of CNN, is a donor to left-progressive causes …
Supreme Court Legitimacy Under Threat? The Role Of Cues In How The Public Responds To Supreme Court Decisions, Laura Moyer, Scott Boddery, Jeffrey Yates, Lindsay Caudill
Supreme Court Legitimacy Under Threat? The Role Of Cues In How The Public Responds To Supreme Court Decisions, Laura Moyer, Scott Boddery, Jeffrey Yates, Lindsay Caudill
Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity
Understanding how the public views the Court and its rulings is crucial to assessing its institutional stability. However, as scholars note, “People are broadly supportive of the court and believe in its ‘legitimacy’—that is, that Supreme Court rulings should be respected and followed. But we don’t know that much about whether people actually agree with the case outcomes themselves.” In this article, we highlight empirical research investigating the factors that affect public agreement with Court decisions, highlighting recent developments from our work. At the onset, it is to note that the public generally hears about the Court’s decisions from media …
Reparations, Or Hush Money?, Christina Glekas
Reparations, Or Hush Money?, Christina Glekas
Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity
No abstract provided.