Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (4)
- Intellectual Property Law (4)
- Legal Education (4)
- Health Law and Policy (3)
- Bioethics and Medical Ethics (2)
-
- Fourteenth Amendment (2)
- Legislation (2)
- Litigation (2)
- Medicine and Health Sciences (2)
- Religion Law (2)
- Science and Technology Law (2)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (1)
- Courts (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Housing Law (1)
- Human Rights Law (1)
- Judges (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- Medical Specialties (1)
- Palliative Care (1)
- Tax Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Patent (4)
- Abortion (1)
- Action research (1)
- Agriculture (1)
- Antitrust (1)
-
- Article III (1)
- Baldwin (1)
- Bose (1)
- Case or Controversy (1)
- Charity (1)
- Civil rights (1)
- Clinical Legal Education (1)
- Conscience (1)
- Contract (1)
- Court of Federal Claims (1)
- Declaratory Judgment (1)
- Declaratory Judgment Jurisdiction (1)
- Declaratory Relief (1)
- Due process (1)
- Enforcement (1)
- Federal Circuit (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Fraud (1)
- Free exercise (1)
- Gene Patents (1)
- Genetically modified (1)
- Gm (1)
- Government Contracts (1)
- Inequitable conduct (1)
- Intellectual property (1)
Articles 1 - 20 of 20
Full-Text Articles in Law
Charity In The 21st Century: Trending Toward Decay, Roger Colinvaux
Charity In The 21st Century: Trending Toward Decay, Roger Colinvaux
Scholarly Articles
The Article argues that the federal tax law framework relating to charitable organizations is decaying. Through an overview of the historical development of the law relating to charity in the 20th century, the Article shows that the statutory law has passively accommodated significant growth of the charitable sector without demanding any rigor of the sector in the form of positive requirements or quantitative measures. This has led to growth without meaningful oversight – a recipe for problems. The Article then provides an overview of many of the scandals that engulfed the sector during the early 21st century and shows that …
Crucible Of Talent: 60 Years Of The Catholic University Law Review, Ralph J. Rohner
Crucible Of Talent: 60 Years Of The Catholic University Law Review, Ralph J. Rohner
Miscellaneous Historical Documents
An article appearing in the Winter 2011 CUA Lawyer celebrating the achievements of the Catholic University Law Review over the past 60 years,
A Century Of Excellence: Columbus Community Legal Services And The Catholic University Law Review Celebrate Milestone Anniversaries, Thomas Haederle
A Century Of Excellence: Columbus Community Legal Services And The Catholic University Law Review Celebrate Milestone Anniversaries, Thomas Haederle
Miscellaneous Historical Documents
An article appearing in the Winter 2011 issue of CUA Lawyer celebrating the achievements of the Clinic and the Law Review over the years.
The Constitutional Right Not To Participate In Abortions: Roe, Casey, And The Fourteenth Amendment Rights Of Healthcare Providers, Mark L. Rienzi
The Constitutional Right Not To Participate In Abortions: Roe, Casey, And The Fourteenth Amendment Rights Of Healthcare Providers, Mark L. Rienzi
Scholarly Articles
The Fourteenth Amendment rights of various parties in the abortion context – the pregnant woman, the fetus, the fetus’ father, the state – have been discussed at length by commentators and the courts. Surprisingly, the Fourteenth Amendment rights of the healthcare provider asked to provide the abortion have not. Roe and Casey establish a pregnant woman’s Fourteenth Amendment right to decide for herself whether to have an abortion. Do those same precedents also protect her doctor’s right to decide whether to participate in abortion procedures?
The Court’s substantive due process analysis typically looks for rights that are “deeply rooted” in …
Regulating Morality Through The Common Law And Exclusionary Zoning, George P. Smith Ii, Gregory P. Bailey
Regulating Morality Through The Common Law And Exclusionary Zoning, George P. Smith Ii, Gregory P. Bailey
Scholarly Articles
The extent to which a free society seeks to regulate sexual expression is problematic. What was defined as immoral or contra bonos mores in the 20th century, has become less of an issue in today’s liberal society. Freedom of sexual intimacy and expression are, to be sure, 1st Amendment and 14th Amendment rights. But, with every assertion of a fundamental right or liberty must come a concomitant understanding that there is a co-ordinate responsibility to exercise that right reasonably. Determining the reasonableness of any conduct grounded in these two amendments must be fact sensitive and guided by community standards. Broad, …
Refractory Pain, Existential Suffering, And Palliative Care: Releasing An Unbearable Lightness Of Being, George P. Smith Ii
Refractory Pain, Existential Suffering, And Palliative Care: Releasing An Unbearable Lightness Of Being, George P. Smith Ii
Scholarly Articles
Since the beginning of the hospice movement in 1967, “total pain management” has been the declared goal of hospice care. Palliating the whole person’s physical, psycho-social, and spiritual states or conditions is central to managing the pain which induces suffering. At the end-stage of life, an inextricable component of the ethics of adjusted care requires recognition of a fundamental right to avoid cruel and unusual suffering from terminal illness. This Article urges wider consideration and use of terminal sedation, or sedation until death, as an efficacious palliative treatment and as a reasonable medical procedure in order to safeguard the “right” …
Reconceptualizing The Law Of Nuisance Through A Theory Of Economic Captivity, George P. Smith Ii, Matthew Saunig
Reconceptualizing The Law Of Nuisance Through A Theory Of Economic Captivity, George P. Smith Ii, Matthew Saunig
Scholarly Articles
Generally, the fact that a plaintiff comes to a nuisance is not a per se defense to a nuisance action. This defense is viewed in many jurisdictions as but a factor in determining whether a defendant’s conduct is an unreasonable interference with use and enjoyment of a neighbor’s property. In principle, two other affirmative defenses are — although not often allowed in practice by the courts — found in contributory negligence and assumption of the risk.
This Article seeks to develop a theory of economic captivity which embraces the notion that a plaintiff may be constrained, socio-economically, in making choices …
Winning The Game Of Appellate Musical Shoes: When The Appeals Band Plays, Jump From The Client’S To The Judge’S Shoes To Write The Statement Of Facts Ballad, Laurie A. Lewis
Scholarly Articles
An appellate brief's Statement of Facts is critical to a successful appeal. The client trusts the attorney with his or her story. To fully hear it, the attorney must actively listen and demonstrate empathy in the initial interview. The attorney needs to step into the client's shoes to retell the story at trial. On appeal, however, the attorney needs to step into the appellate judge's shoes. The story must be recast for an audience knowing nothing about the client. It must be interesting, and appeal to the judge's spirit of justice. If the client suffered an injustice in the court …
Threatening The Founding Ideal Of A Republic Of Letters: An Assessment Of The Supreme Court's Copyright Decisions Over The First Decade Of The Twenty-First Century, Susanna Frederick Fischer
Threatening The Founding Ideal Of A Republic Of Letters: An Assessment Of The Supreme Court's Copyright Decisions Over The First Decade Of The Twenty-First Century, Susanna Frederick Fischer
Scholarly Articles
Disregard for the social value of a modern Republic of Letters like that so revered by Madison and Jefferson is a conspicuous hallmark of the Supreme Court's recent copyright case law. The four decisions in which the Court has issued full opinions since 2001 (New York Times Co. v. Tasini (2001), Eldred v. Ashcroft (2003), MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd. (2005), and Reed Elsevier, Inc. v. Muchnick (2010) indicate that a majority of the Court does not share with Jefferson and Madison a belief in the civic importance of protecting widespread public access …
Intellect And Virtue: The Idea Of A Catholic University, John H. Garvey
Intellect And Virtue: The Idea Of A Catholic University, John H. Garvey
Scholarly Articles
No abstract provided.
Standing To Sue In The Myriad Genetics Case, Megan M. La Belle
Standing To Sue In The Myriad Genetics Case, Megan M. La Belle
Scholarly Articles
In recent years, the topic of gene patents has generated significant debate among medical researchers, biotechnology companies, academics, policymakers, and patent lawyers. The controversy implicates a wide range of legal and policy questions, including whether human genes should be patentable, and whether such patents stimulate or stifle innovation. In Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, a high-profile case recently before the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, a divided panel of the court addressed these questions. Before reaching the merits of the case, however, the court had to decide whether the plaintiffs had standing to sue …
Telling Tales In School: Storytelling For Self-Reflection And Pedagogical Improvement In Clinical Legal Education, Faith Mullen
Telling Tales In School: Storytelling For Self-Reflection And Pedagogical Improvement In Clinical Legal Education, Faith Mullen
Scholarly Articles
In the past twenty years, there has been a surge in legal scholarship that recognizes the value of story in law, and law schools are beginning to tap into the extraordinary power of story. Largely absent from this mix are stories told by law students about their own experiences with the law. The authors used class time formerly devoted to clinic rounds to offer students the opportunity to tell stories about their cases outside the presence of their supervising attorneys. Clinical faculty then compared their own, recorded version of the story of a case with the student’s version. This article …
Bioethics And Human Rights: Toward A New Constitutionalism, George P. Smith Ii
Bioethics And Human Rights: Toward A New Constitutionalism, George P. Smith Ii
Scholarly Articles
No abstract provided.
Differentiating The Federal Circuit, Elizabeth I. Winston
Differentiating The Federal Circuit, Elizabeth I. Winston
Scholarly Articles
In 1982, Congress created the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Often referred to as an experiment, the Federal Circuit has flourished. Born again from the ashes of its predecessors, the aptly nicknamed Phoenix Court continues to grow in significance, stature, and strength. As it grows, however, the court remains rooted in its history and in its unique nature. This Article explores the Federal Circuit’s structure and its impact on the development of Federal Circuit jurisprudence. The Federal Circuit is distinguishable by more than its national jurisdiction – the very essence of the court sets it apart …
Clarifying The Doctrine Of Inequitable Conduct, Elizabeth I. Winston
Clarifying The Doctrine Of Inequitable Conduct, Elizabeth I. Winston
Scholarly Articles
Addressing squarely the issue of the multiple standards of materiality in inequitable conduct litigation, Therasense v. Becton Dickinson raises many difficult issues that could be clarified through the lens of the analogous concept of fraud on the Trademark Office. The standards for finding fraud on the Trademark Office lack the ambiguity found in the doctrine of inequitable conduct, despite the parallel penalties of unenforceability and requirements of proof of materiality and intent. Informed by the many decisions of Judge Michel, this essay concludes that the standards for finding fraud before the Trademark Office, as set forth in In re Bose, …
Bounty Hunters And Whistleblowers: Constitutional Concerns For False Claims Actions After Passage Of The Patient Protection And Affordable Care Act Of 2010, A.G. Harmon
Scholarly Articles
Recently, the False Claims Act (FCA) was amended by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (PPACA). In a five-word alteration, the PPACA has greatly expanded the reach of the statute, in terms of how a case must be proven, who has to prove it, and what circumstances, if any, will bar the proceeding from going forward." Additionally, new constitutional and policy concerns stem from the increased governmental discretion in deciding which suits can and cannot proceed.6 The problems resulting from the government's expanded discretion go to the very nature of qui tam actions themselves.
This article will …
An Originalist Congress?, Joel Alicea
An Originalist Congress?, Joel Alicea
Scholarly Articles
Among the campaign promises Republicans made to voters this fall was a pledge that every piece of proposed legislation would cite the constitutional provision that authorizes it. Given lawmakers' reliance on the courts to determine the constitutionality of our laws, the new majority's promise could open some fascinating — and useful — debates. Chief among them: Just how should Congress interpret the Constitution?
Health Care: Why Jurisdiction Matters, Kevin C. Walsh
Health Care: Why Jurisdiction Matters, Kevin C. Walsh
Scholarly Articles
Congress’s enactment of comprehensive healthcare reform legislation last year was the culmination of one round of an intense debate that continues today. The second round began the same day that the first round ended, when President Obama signed the legislation. In this second round, the locus of debate has shifted from Congress to the courts, which are processing a slew of lawsuits filed immediately after enactment.
One of the most prominent is Virginia v. Sebelius. The lawsuit presents on its face a prominent and critically important question of federalism: Did Congress exceed the limits of its enumerated legislative powers by …
Commentary, Mary Graw Leary
A Patent Misperception, Elizabeth I. Winston
A Patent Misperception, Elizabeth I. Winston
Scholarly Articles
Antitrust and intellectual property laws promote innovation and competition. As long as the costs of promotion do not exceed the benefit to society, then the laws act in harmony. Discord arises when patent holders use public and private ordering to restrain competition, restrict downstream trade, prevent the development of competing products and limit output by competitors. Using the Patent Act and the misperception of antitrust immunity to create a parallel and under-regulated legal system allows a small number of patent holders to coordinate their behavior to maximize profits and minimize competition. The Patent Act provides no shield to prosecution for …