Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law

Scholarly Articles

Series

1965

Articles 1 - 2 of 2

Full-Text Articles in Law

Title 28, Section 2255 Of The United States Code: Motion To Vacate, Set Aside Or Correct Sentence: Effective Or Ineffective Aid To A Federal Prisoner?, George P. Smith Ii Jan 1965

Title 28, Section 2255 Of The United States Code: Motion To Vacate, Set Aside Or Correct Sentence: Effective Or Ineffective Aid To A Federal Prisoner?, George P. Smith Ii

Scholarly Articles

This article places in historical perspective the enactment and administration by the federal courts of Section 2255 of the Judicial Code and concludes a prisoner’s basic right to attack, collaterally, a conviction is largely unimpaired by this legislation. Section 2255 was enacted not with the idea of enlarging the class of remedies already available to attack a conviction, but rather to provide that a proper attack upon an original conviction be made in the sentencing court and not in some other court through use of the writ of habeas corpus. Resort to habeas corpus is thus allowed only when the …


Friendly V. Hostile Fires, George P. Smith Ii Jan 1965

Friendly V. Hostile Fires, George P. Smith Ii

Scholarly Articles

What is fire? This is the central question in the discussion of the friendly-hostile fire doctrine. Since fire is defined differently by the historian, the scientist, the layman, the economist, the lawyer and the insurance agent, it becomes necessary to consider these viewpoints separately and hopefully seek to clarify the existing differences. After completing this undertaking, it then becomes necessary to discuss the historical evolution of the doctrine with particular emphasis being placed upon a careful dissection of the early English case of Austin v. Drew which first introduced the principles embodied in the doctrine and the American case of …