Law Commons^™

Formalism And Pragmatism In The Analysis Of Damages For Indirect Patent Infringement, Dmitry Karshtedt

Dmitry Karshtedt

No abstract provided.

Patent Litigation And The Internet, John R. Allison, Emerson H. Tiller, Samantha Zyontz

John R. Allison

Using both univariate comparisons and multiple regression techniques, we find that: (1) Internet patents and their two subtypes, broad Internet business models and narrower Internet business techniques, were litigated at a far higher rate than other (non-Internet patents, or NIPs)—they were between 7.5 and 9.5 times more likely to end up in infringement litigation, depending on the model we used. (2) Within the category of Internet patents, those on business models were litigated at a significantly higher rate than those on business techniques. (3) Across both Internet patents and NIPs, patents issued to small entities, especially individuals and small businesses, …

How (Not) To Discourage The Unscrupulous Copyist, Peter L. Ludwig

Peter L. Ludwig

This short article explores how the U.S. and Japanese courts implement the doctrine of equivalence when determining patent infringement. The doctrine of equivalence is a balance of, on one hand, the public’s interest to know the metes and bounds of the patent; and on the other hand, the private interest of the patentee to be granted a sufficient scope for the granted patent. After comparing and contrasting the courts’ implementation of the doctrine, I propose a new method that places the burden on the patent practitioner, before infringement proceedings begin, to determine the proper scope of the patent.

Asserting Foreign Patent Claims In U.S. Federal Courts: What’S Left After Voda V. Cordis?, Eric D. Chan

Eric David Chan

Patent law is inherently territorial; a patent covers infringing activity only within the borders of the nation in which it should granted. However, this makes enforcing patent rights worldwide a daunting challenge. Rather than recklessly extending the extraterritorial reach of U.S. patent law, a better alternative would be to assert claims for infringement of multiple foreign patents in a single, U.S. forum.

This paper focuses on the new barriers raised to the prospects for such consolidated, multinational patent infringement proceedings by Voda v. Cordis, decided by the Federal Circuit in February. Voda held that federal supplemental jurisdiction should almost never …

Clarifying The Tactical Use Of The Dutch Cross-Border Injunction In International Patent Litigation, Severin De Wit

Severin de Wit

Paper Based on a Presentation given at the Euroforum Conference in London on 24 and 25 February 199