Law Commons^™

Laboratories Of Constitutionality: How State High Courts Paved The Way For Federal Courts To Invalidate Prohibitions On Same-Sex Marriage, Tyler T. Rosenbaum

Tyler T Rosenbaum

This article looks at the opinions of the state high courts that have adjudicated the constitutionality under their state constitutions of prohibitions on same-sex marriage and, given the extent to which the state high courts deferred to Supreme Court case law in interpreting their own constitutions, concludes that a federal court would be more likely than not to find that such prohibitions violate the United States Constitution.

With respect to a claimed substantive due process right to same-sex marriage, the Supreme Court’s ruling in Lawrence v. Texas undermined much of the precedent that would have required a careful, tradition-bound analysis. …

Interstate Marriage Recognition And The Right To Travel, Mark Strasser

Mark Strasser

Historically, states were forced decide whether to recognize a marriage, valid where celebrated, that could not have been celebrated locally. As a general rule, non-incestuous, non-polygamous marriages that were valid in the domicile at the time of celebration were treated as valid everywhere, although courts split with respect to how to apply the rule to interracial marriages. Yet, these marriage recognition practices occurred in a context where it was believed that the United States Constitution imposed no limitations on the ability of states to refuse to recognize a marriage validly celebrated elsewhere. This article examines interstate marriage recognition practices, and …

Moving Beyond The 'Immutability Debate' In The Fight For Equality After, M. Katherine B. Darmer

M. Katherine B. Darmer

On May 15, 2008, the California Supreme Court issued its historic decision regarding marriage rights for same-sex couples. In the course of its opinion, the court found that classifications based upon sexual orientation are subject to the protections of "strict scrutiny" for purposes of the state's equal protection clause. The court also found that marriage is a fundamental right that extends to same-sex couples.

On November 4, 2008, 52% of California voters voted for Proposition 8, which purported to "amend" the state constitution by adding fourteen words in a new clause following the equal protection clause: "only marriage between a …

Gay Equality, Religious Liberty, And The First Amendment, Matthew J. Murray

Matthew Murray

Are gay rights laws and religious liberty fundamentally in conflict? Would legal recognition of same-sex marriage lead to a wave of litigation threatening the religious liberty of those who object to such unions on religious grounds? Opponents of same-sex marriage have vocally asserted as much. This Article argues, however, that modifications in civil marriage laws in fact pose little to no threat to the liberty of religious objectors. Rather, the real arena of potential conflict between religious liberty and gay equality arises in the context of sexual orientation nondiscrimination laws. But these tensions are not new. The courts should be …