Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (2)
- Constitutional Law (2)
- Human Rights Law (2)
- International Law (2)
- Law and Politics (2)
-
- Comparative and Foreign Law (1)
- Courts (1)
- Criminal Law (1)
- Immigration Law (1)
- Judges (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Legal History (1)
- Political Science (1)
- Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (1)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (1)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (1)
Articles 1 - 13 of 13
Full-Text Articles in Law
The True Cost Of Economic Rights Jurisprudence, Max Mccann
The True Cost Of Economic Rights Jurisprudence, Max Mccann
Max McCann
This Article discusses the distinction between economic and individual rights in contemporary political and legal discourse. As discussed herein, the phrase economic rights typically invokes notions of the ability to spend, save, and transfer wealth freely, as well as other related issues, such as the deregulation of industry and tax reform. In contrast, individual rights conjures ideas of being free in one’s person, including reproductive rights, free speech, and freedom of assembly.
With both historic and recent examples, this Article argues that the distinction between economic and individual rights is problematic at best. Rights spring forth from human interests, and …
Painting Preemption With The Wrong Brush: The Misapplication Of The Preemption Doctrines In Von Saher V. Norton Simon Museum Of Art, Alexis H. Rossman
Painting Preemption With The Wrong Brush: The Misapplication Of The Preemption Doctrines In Von Saher V. Norton Simon Museum Of Art, Alexis H. Rossman
Alexis H. Rossman
Adolf Hitler and the Nazis looted thousands of works of art throughout World War II. After the war, many pieces were not returned to the rightful owners but instead remained in public and private collections throughout the United States and abroad. California enacted California Code of Civil Procedure Section 354.3 in response to difficulties encountered by plaintiffs seeking to recover these pieces. The statute created a forum in California courts for plaintiffs to bring claims as rightful owners of Holocaust-era artwork. The Ninth Circuit recently found that this statute was preempted by the federal government’s exclusive power to conduct foreign …
Proportionality And Prosecutorial Discretion: Challenges To The Constitutionality Of Georgia’S Death Penalty Laws And Procedures Amidst The Deficiencies Of The State’S Mandatory Appellate Review Structure, Kristen M. Nugent
Kristen Nugent
Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent denial of certiorari in Walker v. Georgia—in which Justice Stevens and Justice Thomas expressed sharply divergent interpretations of the Court’s precedent regarding the importance of a thorough proportionality review to Georgia’s capital sentencing scheme—the Court seems poised to reexamine the constitutional implications of Georgia’s death penalty statute and the manner in which it is implemented. In anticipation of such an analysis, and in order to advocate that the U.S. Supreme Court clarify its position in a way that aligns with its longstanding tradition of requiring moderation in the infliction of death, this article dissects …
Administrative Law In The Roberts Court: The First Four Years, Robin K. Craig
Administrative Law In The Roberts Court: The First Four Years, Robin K. Craig
Robin K. Craig
Given Justice David Souter’s retirement in the summer of 2009, the four U.S. Supreme Court terms that began in October 2005 and ended in June 2009 constitute a first distinct phase of the Roberts Court. During those first four terms, moreover, the Court decided a number of cases relevant to the practice and structure of administrative law.
This Article provides a comprehensive survey and summary of the Supreme Court’s administrative-law-related decisions issued during this first phase of the Roberts Court. It organizes those decisions into three categories. Part I of this Article discusses the Supreme Court decisions that affect access …
The Revolution Will Be Sub Silento: The Roberts Court And The Democratic Costs Of Judicial Minimalism, Scott E. Lemieux
The Revolution Will Be Sub Silento: The Roberts Court And The Democratic Costs Of Judicial Minimalism, Scott E. Lemieux
Scott E Lemieux
Various theorists have touted the virtues of the jurisprudence known as “minimalism,” in which judges avoid broad holdings and try to avoid reaching large constitutional issues if narrower holdings are available. Minimalism, its proponents assert, increases judicial modesty, improves the quality of political deliberation, and enhances the legitimacy of the court. The first terms of the Roberts Court (as well as the late Rehnquist Court), however, raise doubts about these purported virtues. In practice, judicial minimalism does not have a strong relationship with judicial modesty, various techniques associated with minimalism carry serious democratic costs, and courts are not inherently entitled …
Of Christmas Trees And Corpus Christi: Ceremonial Deism And Change In Meaning Over Time, Jessie Hill
Of Christmas Trees And Corpus Christi: Ceremonial Deism And Change In Meaning Over Time, Jessie Hill
Jessie Hill
Although the Supreme Court turned away an Establishment Clause challenge to the words “under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance in Elk Grove Unified School District v. Newdow, the issues raised by that case are not going away anytime soon. Legal controversies over facially religious government speech have become one of the most regular and prominent features of Establishment Clause jurisprudence – and indeed, a second-round challenge to the Pledge of Allegiance is currently percolating, which is likely to result in resolution by the Supreme Court. That resolution will depend on an understanding of the social meaning of the practice …
A Submission To The Inquiry Into The Resale Royalty Right For Visual Artists Bill 2008 (Cth), Robert Dearn, Matthew Rimmer
A Submission To The Inquiry Into The Resale Royalty Right For Visual Artists Bill 2008 (Cth), Robert Dearn, Matthew Rimmer
Matthew Rimmer
We whole-heartedly support the introduction of a right of resale for visual artists in Australia. Such a measure is long overdue – especially given that the doctrine was first theorized in 1893; and first implemented in France in 1920. We firmly believe that the Australian Parliament can fashion a right of resale, which can promote the principles of social justice, and ensure that there is a fair and equitable relationship between artists and the art market in Australia.We would congratulate the Federal Government for its vision and determination in establishing a resale royalty right for visual artists in Australia. We …
To Pursue And Obtain Happiness And Safety, Timothy Sandefur
To Pursue And Obtain Happiness And Safety, Timothy Sandefur
Timothy Sandefur
The virtues of free markets are routinely described in economic terminology, and the so-called "laissez-faire" era in constitutional law is said to be a time during which the economic theory of free markets dominated the law. Yet in reality, both the intellectual defense of free markets in Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations (and its progenitors) as well as the legal theories that prevailed during the "Lochner era," were based not on economics but on moral and political philosophy. Specifically, these ideas were descendants from the classical liberal theory of rights articulated in the Declaration of Independence: specifically, that each person …
States Of Resistance: The Real Id Act And Constitutional Limits Upon Federal Deputization Of State Agencies In The Regulation Of Non-Citizens, Shirley Lin Esq.
States Of Resistance: The Real Id Act And Constitutional Limits Upon Federal Deputization Of State Agencies In The Regulation Of Non-Citizens, Shirley Lin Esq.
Shirley Lin Esq.
Since the passage of the REAL ID Act in 2005, federal and state governments have clashed over implementation of the law's sweeping and prohibitively expensive changes to states' motorist licensing schemes. The REAL ID Act would affect all 56 U.S. jurisdictions and more than 240 million driver's license applicants or holders.The Article discusses the design flaws of the REAL ID Act within the context of the nation's traditional "immigration federalism" framework in regulating non-citizens, and evaluates the viability of legal challenges on the grounds of equal protection, due process, federalism principles, and international law.Part I discusses states’ authority over non-citizens …
Cross-Examining Film, Jessica M. Silbey
Cross-Examining Film, Jessica M. Silbey
Jessica Silbey
The Supreme Court decision in Scott v. Harris holds that a Georgia police officer did not violate a fleeing suspect's Fourth Amendment rights when he caused the suspect's car to crash. The court's decision relies almost entirely on the filmed version of the high-speed police chase taken from a “dash-cam,” a video camera mounted on the dashboard of the pursuing police cruiser. The Supreme Court said that in light of the contrary stories told by the opposing parties to the lawsuit, the only story to be believed was that told by the video. In Scott v. Harris, the court fell …
Deliberative Democracy And Weak Courts: Constitutional Design In Nascent Democracies, Edsel F. Tupaz
Deliberative Democracy And Weak Courts: Constitutional Design In Nascent Democracies, Edsel F. Tupaz
Edsel F Tupaz
This Article addresses the question of constitutional design in young and transitional democracies. It argues for the adoption of a “weak” form of judicial review, as opposed to “strong” review which typifies much of contemporary adjudication. It briefly describes how the dialogical strain of deliberative democratic theory might well constitute the normative predicate for systems of weak review. In doing so, the Article draws from various judicial practices, from European supranational tribunals to Canadian courts and even Indian jurisprudence. The Article concludes with the suggestion that no judicial apparatus other than the weak structure of judicial review can better incite …
Jon & Kate Plus The State: Why Congress Should Protect Children In Reality Programming, Dayna B. Royal
Jon & Kate Plus The State: Why Congress Should Protect Children In Reality Programming, Dayna B. Royal
Dayna B. Royal
As "reality" programming continues to increase in popularity, so too does the number of children living out their young lives in front of the camera. Yet the current legal regime is inadequate to protect these children, whose parents have betrayed their best interests for fame and fortune. This article argues that Congress should enact a statute providing a regulatory sliding scale based on age that would largely prohibit children from participating in reality programming. A federal statute would bring clarity to this unsettled area of the law while ensuring that parents and programming executives cannot skirt individual state laws and …
Wild-West Cowboys Versus Cheese-Eating Surrender Monkeys: Some Problems In Comparative Approaches To Extreme Speech, Eric Heinze
Wild-West Cowboys Versus Cheese-Eating Surrender Monkeys: Some Problems In Comparative Approaches To Extreme Speech, Eric Heinze
Prof. Eric Heinze, Queen Mary University of London
All European states ban some form of hate speech. US law precludes such bans. In view of the political and symbolic importance of free speech, it becomes tempting to assume that trans-Atlantic differences towards hate speech reflect deeper cultural divisions.
However, we must pay attention to comparative methodology before drawing ambitious conclusions about cross-cultural social and political differences that derive solely from differences in formal, black-letter norms. In this volume, Robert Post claims that formal, constitutional requirements of content-neutral regulation reflect a freer public sphere in the US, in contrast to the European public sphere.
Yet a legal-realist approach casts …