Law Commons^™

Leaving The Dale To Be More Fair: On Cls And First Amendment Jurisprudence, Mark Strasser

Mark Strasser

In Christian Legal Society of the University of California, Hastings College of Law v. Martinez, the Supreme Court upheld the Hastings College of Law’s requirement that all recognized student groups have an open membership policy. The decision has been criticized for a variety of reasons, e.g., that the Court conflated the First Amendment tests for speech and association. What has not been adequately explored is the degree to which the Court has modified limited purpose public forum analysis in the university context over the past few decades, resulting in a jurisprudence that is virtually unrecognizable in light of the more …

A Family Affair? Domestic Relations And Involuntary Public Figure Status, Mark Strasser

Mark Strasser

The constitutional limitations on defamation damages have changed greatly over the past five decades. Initially, only statements about public officials triggered such limitations, but the class of individuals triggering the most demanding standard was subsequently expanded. Over the past half century, members of the Court could neither agree about the kinds of people nor the kinds of statements that should be afforded constitutional protection. Even when ostensibly agreeing about the criteria to be used in defamation cases, members of the Court disagreed greatly about how the announced criteria should be applied in practice.

One of the most doctrinally confusing aspects …

Congress, Federal Courts, And Domestic Relations Exceptionalism, Mark Strasser

Mark Strasser

Family law is often cited as a paradigmatic example of state law, and the Supreme Court has often trumpeted the “domestic relations exception” as a justification for preventing federal involvement in family matters. Yet, it is of course true that a variety of federal programs affect the family, so it is important to figure out which areas are reserved for the states and which are not. Further, the federal courts have heard a variety of cases involving family matters, so it is not as if the courts never have jurisdiction to hear such cases. The tests for determining when the …

The Next Battleground? Personhood, Privacy, And Assisted Reproductive Technologies, Mark Strasser

Mark Strasser

Personhood statutes and amendments have been proposed in several states. As a general matter, they establish as a matter of state law that legal personhood begins at conception. Such laws may have implications for state policies concerning abortion and contraception, and will have implications for other areas of law including state policies related to assisted reproductive technologies. Yet, some of the ways in which these different areas of law might be affected are not well understood and thus are explored here.

Whistleblowing, Public Employees, And The First Amendment, Mark Strasser

Mark Strasser

Recent revelations of extensive public wrongdoing illustrate the need for whistleblower protection so that governmental wrongdoing is more likely to come to light. While there is some statutory protection of whistleblowing as long as certain conditions have been met, a separate issue is the degree to which the Constitution protects whistleblowers under the First Amendment. Ironically, the constitutional protections for whistleblowers have decreased over the past several decades, leaving an impoverished system of protection for discussions of great public interest. This article analyzes the respects in which First Amendment protections for matters of great public import were once fairly robust …

The Onslaught On Academic Freedom, Mark Strasser

Mark Strasser

The United States Supreme Court has long recognized the importance of academic freedom both within and outside of the classroom. However, in a case having nothing to do with the academy, Garcetti v. Ceballos, the Court cast into doubt the validity of an entire line of cases, almost inviting the circuits to rewrite First Amendment doctrine in the entire area. The circuits have responded, creating a jurisprudence that threatens to bring about the negative consequences discussed over the past half-century. This article explores the First Amendment protections of academic freedom, explaining how Garcetti and the courts interpreting it have eviscerated …

Making The Anomalous Even More Anomalous: On Hosanna-Tabor, The Ministerial Exception, And The Constitution, Mark Strasser

Mark Strasser

In Hosanna–Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Court held that the First Amendment incorporates the ministerial exception and, further, found that the plaintiff fell within that exception and so could not press her claim. However, courts and commentators hoping for clarification of Religion Clauses jurisprudence more generally or even for a firm constitutional grounding of the ministerial exception may well be disappointed. The Court has raised more questions than it has answered, and has provided such little helpful guidance to the lower courts that Hosanna-Tabor is likely to lead to greater confusion in the …