Law Commons^™

Search, Essential Facilities, And The Antitrust Duty To Deal, Marina Lao

Marina Lao

The core of the gathering antitrust case against Google seems to be that it favors its own or its affiliates’ content over that of its competitors in ancillary markets in the unpaid search results. Seeking the competitive advantages inherent in integration, which is what preferential treatment of one’s own property is about, is usually not unlawful. This paper examines whether “essential facilities” and the duty-to-deal nonetheless provide a basis for prohibiting this practice, as some have suggested, and concludes that they do not.

On the threshold monopoly power issue, most assume, based on Google’s high percentage of general search queries, …

Search, Essential Facilities, And The Antitrust Duty To Deal, Marina Lao

Marina Lao

The core of the gathering antitrust case against Google seems to be that it favors its own or its affiliates’ content over that of its competitors in ancillary markets in the unpaid search results. Seeking the competitive advantages inherent in integration, which is what preferential treatment of one’s own property is about, is usually not unlawful. This paper examines whether “essential facilities” and the duty-to-deal nonetheless provide a basis for prohibiting this practice, as some have suggested, and concludes that they do not.

On the threshold monopoly power issue, most assume, based on Google’s high percentage of general search queries, …

Search, Essential Facilities, And The Antitrust Duty To Deal, Marina Lao

Marina Lao

The core of the gathering antitrust case against Google seems to be that it favors its own or its affiliates’ content over that of its competitors in ancillary markets in the unpaid search results. Seeking the competitive advantages inherent in integration, which is what preferential treatment of one’s own property is about, is usually not unlawful. This paper examines whether “essential facilities” and the duty-to-deal nonetheless provide a basis for prohibiting this practice, as some have suggested, and concludes that they do not.

On the threshold monopoly power issue, most assume, based on Google’s high percentage of general search queries, …

The Perfect Is The Enemy Of The Good: The Antitrust Objections To The Google Books Settlement, Marina Lao

Marina Lao

This Article argues that, contrary to the assertions of the Department of Justice and others, the proposed Amended Settlement Agreement in the high-profile Google Books case recently rejected by the district court is not only not anticompetitive, but is procompetitive, both from economic and social perspectives. The controversy surrounding the settlement mainly revolves around the so-called “orphan” or “unclaimed" books—books whose copyright holders cannot be identified or located. The primary antitrust claim is that the settlement would give Google a de facto monopoly over the digital distribution of these books and also arguably further Google’s dominance in the online search …