Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional Law (4)
- Legal History (4)
- Second Amendment (3)
- Arms Trade Treaty (2)
- Human Rights Law (2)
-
- International Law (2)
- Law and Society (2)
- Right to keep and bear arms (2)
- Affordable Care Act (1)
- Civil Rights (1)
- Comparative Law (1)
- Dead constitution (1)
- Geneva Declaration (1)
- Global Burden of Armed Violence (1)
- Health care (1)
- Individual mandate (1)
- Interstate commerce clause (1)
- Jack Balkin (1)
- Living constitution (1)
- Organizations (1)
- Originalism (1)
- Reasonableness (1)
- Religion (1)
- Social Welfare (1)
- Standard of review (1)
- State constitutions (1)
- Strict scrutiny (1)
- United Nations (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Arms Trade Treaty: Zimbabwe, The Democratic Republic Of The Congo, And The Prospects For Arms Embargoes On Human Rights Violators., David B. Kopel, Paul Gallant, J0anne D. Eisen
The Arms Trade Treaty: Zimbabwe, The Democratic Republic Of The Congo, And The Prospects For Arms Embargoes On Human Rights Violators., David B. Kopel, Paul Gallant, J0anne D. Eisen
David B Kopel
Advocates of the proposed United Nations Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) promise that it will prevent the flow of arms to human rights violators. This paper first examines the ATT, and observes that the ATT, if implemented as promised, would require dozens of additional arms embargoes, including embargoes on much of Africa. The paper then provides case studies of the current supply of arms to the dictatorship in Zimbabwe and to the warlords in the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). The paper argues that the ATT would do nothing to remediate the conditions which have allowed so many arms …
The Right To Arms In The Living Constitution, David B. Kopel
The Right To Arms In The Living Constitution, David B. Kopel
David B Kopel
This Article presents a brief history of the Second Amendment as part of the living Constitution. From the Early Republic through the present, the American public has always understood the Second Amendment as guaranteeing a right to own firearms for self-defense. That view has been in accordance with élite legal opinion, except for a period in part of the twentieth century.
"Living constitutionalism" should be distinguished from "dead constitutionalism." Under the former, courts looks to objective referents of shared public understanding of constitutional values. Examples of objective referents include state constitutions, as well as federal or state laws to protect …
State Court Standards Of Review For The Right To Keep And Bear Arms, David B. Kopel, Clayton Cramer
State Court Standards Of Review For The Right To Keep And Bear Arms, David B. Kopel, Clayton Cramer
David B Kopel
Cases on the right to arms in state constitutions can provide useful guidance for courts addressing Second Amendment issues. Although some people have claimed that state courts always use a highly deferential version of "reasonableness," this article shows that many courts have employed rigorous standards, including the tools of strict scrutiny, such as overbreadth, narrow tailoring, and less restrictive means. Courts have also used categoricalism (deciding whether something is inside or outside the right) and narrow construction (to prevent criminal laws from conflicting with the right to arms). Even when formally applying "reasonableness," many courts have used reasonableness as a …
The Keystone Of The Second Amendment: Quakers, The Pennsylvania Constitution, And The Questionable Scholarship Of Nathan Kozuskanich, David B. Kopel, Clayton Cramer
The Keystone Of The Second Amendment: Quakers, The Pennsylvania Constitution, And The Questionable Scholarship Of Nathan Kozuskanich, David B. Kopel, Clayton Cramer
David B Kopel
Historian Nathan Kozuskanich claims that the Second Amendment-like the arms provision of the 1776 Pennsylvania Constitution-is only a guarantee of a right of individuals to participate in the militia, in defense of the polity. Kozuskanich’s claim about the Second Amendment is based on two articles he wrote about the original public meaning of the right to arms in Pennsylvania, including the 1776 and 1790 Pennsylvania constitutional arms guarantees.
Part I of this Article provides a straightforward legal history of the right to arms provisions in the 1776 Pennsylvania Constitution and of the 1790 Pennsylvania Constitution. We examine Kozuskanich’s claims about …
How Many Global Deaths From Arms? Reasons To Question The 740,000 Factoid Being Used To Promote The Arms Trade Treaty, David B. Kopel, Paul Gallant, Joanne D. Eisen
How Many Global Deaths From Arms? Reasons To Question The 740,000 Factoid Being Used To Promote The Arms Trade Treaty, David B. Kopel, Paul Gallant, Joanne D. Eisen
David B Kopel
Currently, the United Nations is drafting an Arms Trade Treaty to impose strict controls on firearms and other weapons. In support of hasty adoption of the Treaty, a UN-related organization of Treaty supporters is has produced a report claiming that armed violence is responsible for 740,000 deaths annually. This Article carefully examines the claim. We find that the claim is based on dubious assumptions, cherry-picking data, and mathematical legerdemain which is inexplicably being withheld from the public. The refusal to disclose the mathematical calculations used to create the 740,000 factoid is itself cause for serious suspicion; our own calculations indicate …
Commerce In The Commerce Clause: A Response To Jack Balkin, David B. Kopel, Robert G. Natelson
Commerce In The Commerce Clause: A Response To Jack Balkin, David B. Kopel, Robert G. Natelson
David B Kopel
The Constitution’s original meaning is its meaning to those ratifying the document during a discrete time period: from its adoption by the Constitutional Convention in late 1787 until Rhode Island’s ratification on May 29, 1790. Reconstructing it requires historical skills, including a comprehensive approach to sources. Jack Balkin’s article Commerce fails to consider the full range of evidence and thereby attributes to the Constitution’s Commerce Clause a scope that virtually no one in the Founding Era believed it had.