Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 30 of 34

Full-Text Articles in Law

A Primer On Hobby Lobby: For-Pro T Corporate Entities’ Challenge To The Hhs Mandate, Free Exercise Rights, Rf ’S Scope, And The Nondelegation Doctrine, Danielle Weatherby, Terri R. Day, Leticia M. Diaz Dec 2014

A Primer On Hobby Lobby: For-Pro T Corporate Entities’ Challenge To The Hhs Mandate, Free Exercise Rights, Rf ’S Scope, And The Nondelegation Doctrine, Danielle Weatherby, Terri R. Day, Leticia M. Diaz

Danielle Weatherby

Earlier this term, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in the consolidated case of Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., the first of a litany of cases in which for-profit business entities are invoking the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) in support of their claims that the Affordable Care Act’s Health and Human Services (HHS) mandate (the Mandate) violates their freedom of religion. In particular, these plaintiffs argue that the Mandate’s requirement that employer-provided health insurance cover the costs of contraceptives, the “morning after” pill, and other fertility-related drugs conflicts with their deeply held religious belief that life …


Global Environmental Constitutionalism, Erin Daly, James May Oct 2014

Global Environmental Constitutionalism, Erin Daly, James May

Erin Daly

No abstract provided.


Ten Good Practices In Environmental Constitutionalism: Structure, Text And Justiciability, James May, Erin Daly Oct 2014

Ten Good Practices In Environmental Constitutionalism: Structure, Text And Justiciability, James May, Erin Daly

Erin Daly

Environmental constitutionalism is a relatively recent phenomenon at the confluence of constitutional law, international law, human rights, and environmental law. It embodies the recognition that the environment is a proper subject for protection in constitutional texts and for vindication by constitutional courts worldwide. This White Paper posits ten “good practices” – those attributes that make effective outcomes more likely, but not assured – in environmental constitutionalism for advancing positive environmental outcomes considering energy, and governance and sustainability. Good practices in environmental constitutionalism can serve as a useful construct for considering the relationship between sustainability, energy and governance. Accordingly, Section A …


Diversity: The Red Herring Of Equal Protection, Sharon E. Rush Oct 2014

Diversity: The Red Herring Of Equal Protection, Sharon E. Rush

Sharon E. Rush

Couching the constitutional inquiry in cases like Bakke and VMI in the context of integration also puts in perspective the diversity justification. Affirmative action policies are constitutional because they integrate state programs. Integration on the basis of race and sex also diversifies state programs. In contrast, attempts to justify sex-segregation in state programs by arguing the policy promotes diversity is irrelevant to an equal protection analysis. Voluntarily created all-female schools should be constitutional because they promote the equal citizenship of women without damaging the equal citizenship stature of men. This is true for voluntarily race-segregated programs for minorities; as well. …


Interning The “Non-Alien” Other: The Illusory Protections Of Citizenship, Natsu Taylor Saito Oct 2014

Interning The “Non-Alien” Other: The Illusory Protections Of Citizenship, Natsu Taylor Saito

Natsu Taylor Saito

Saito draws parallels between the internment of Japanese Americans during WWII and the current actions being taken by the US government as it seeks out terrorists in the post-9/11 world. The action of unequal prosecution of citizens based on race has roots that extend far back in American history, and the unfair internment of citizens in the 20th century should not be considered an aberration of public policy.


The Scope Of “High Crimes And Misdemeanors” After The Impeachment Of President Clinton, Neil Kinkopf Oct 2014

The Scope Of “High Crimes And Misdemeanors” After The Impeachment Of President Clinton, Neil Kinkopf

Neil J. Kinkopf

Kinkopf believes that the House of Representatives' decision to impeach Pres Clinton on the charge that he committed perjury before the grand jury, a charge that did not involve official conduct, was proper. Even though Pres Clinton's misconduct was not a proper basis for impeachment or conviction, his case demonstrates that if would be terribly unwise to understand official misconduct to be a necessary element of a high crime or misdemeanor.


Supreme Court Religious Freedom Case Should Give Us Pride, Alan E. Garfield Oct 2014

Supreme Court Religious Freedom Case Should Give Us Pride, Alan E. Garfield

Alan E Garfield

No abstract provided.


Constitution And Pollution: Federalism At Work, David R. Hodas Sep 2014

Constitution And Pollution: Federalism At Work, David R. Hodas

David R. Hodas

No abstract provided.


Are ‘We The People’ Meeting Our Responsibilities?, Alan E. Garfield Sep 2014

Are ‘We The People’ Meeting Our Responsibilities?, Alan E. Garfield

Alan E Garfield

No abstract provided.


Historical Framework For Reviving Constitutional Protection For Property And Contract Rights , James L. Kainen Aug 2014

Historical Framework For Reviving Constitutional Protection For Property And Contract Rights , James L. Kainen

James L. Kainen

No abstract provided.


The Founders’ Origination Clause (And Implications For The Affordable Care Act), Prof. Robert G. Natelson Aug 2014

The Founders’ Origination Clause (And Implications For The Affordable Care Act), Prof. Robert G. Natelson

Robert G. Natelson

This Article is the first comprehensive examination of the original legal force of the Constitution’s Origination Clause, drawing not merely on the records of the 1787-90 constitutional debates, but on founding-era British and American legislative practice and other sources. This Article defines the bills governed by the Origination Clause, the precise meaning of the House origination requirement, and the extent of the Senate’s amendment power. For illustrative purposes, the Article tests against its findings the currently-litigated claim that the financial penalty for failure to acquire individual health insurance under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is invalid as a …


The Constitutional Right To Bargain Collectively: The Ironies Of Labour History In The Supreme Court Of Canada, Eric Tucker Jul 2014

The Constitutional Right To Bargain Collectively: The Ironies Of Labour History In The Supreme Court Of Canada, Eric Tucker

Eric M. Tucker

In June 2007 the Supreme Court of Canada held that the right to collective bargaining is a constitutionally protected under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms' guarantee of freedom of association. In so doing, they overruled a twenty-year old line of precedent that had rejected that very proposition. The court rested its current position of four grounds, one of which was that Canadian labour history supports the view that collective bargaining had become recognized as a fundamental right prior to the Charter. This article critically reviews the court's labour history and argues that it erroneously asserts that workers enjoyed a …


Is Contraception Mandate ‘No Big Deal?’, Alan E. Garfield Jun 2014

Is Contraception Mandate ‘No Big Deal?’, Alan E. Garfield

Alan E Garfield

No abstract provided.


Institutional Autonomy And Constitutional Structure, Randy J. Kozel Jun 2014

Institutional Autonomy And Constitutional Structure, Randy J. Kozel

Randy J Kozel

This Review makes two claims. The first is that Paul Horwitz’s excellent book, "First Amendment Institutions," depicts the institutionalist movement in robust and provocative form. The second is that it would be a mistake to assume from its immersion in First Amendment jurisprudence (not to mention its title) that the book's implications are limited to the First Amendment. Professor Horwitz presents First Amendment institutionalism as a wide-ranging theory of constitutional structure whose focus is as much on constraining the authority of political government as it is on facilitating expression. These are the terms on which the book's argument — and, …


Constitutional Limitations On Sovereignty, 2014 Edition, Garrett Power Jun 2014

Constitutional Limitations On Sovereignty, 2014 Edition, Garrett Power

Garrett Power

This electronic book is published in a searchable PDF format as a part of the E-scholarship Repository of the University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law. It is an “open content” casebook intended for classroom use in courses in Constitutional Law, Land Use Control, and Environmental Law. It consists of 130 odd judicial opinions (most rendered by the U.S. Supreme Court) carefully selected from the two hundred years of American constitutional history which address the clash between public sovereignty and private property. The text considers both the personal right to liberty and the personal right in property.

The …


Justice Lewis F. Powell's Baffling Vote In Roe V. Wade, Samuel W. Calhoun May 2014

Justice Lewis F. Powell's Baffling Vote In Roe V. Wade, Samuel W. Calhoun

Samuel W. Calhoun

No abstract provided.


Why Strive For Balance In A Roe Symposium?, Samuel W. Calhoun May 2014

Why Strive For Balance In A Roe Symposium?, Samuel W. Calhoun

Samuel W. Calhoun

No abstract provided.


Here’S Some Malarkey: Judges Are Umpires, Alan E. Garfield May 2014

Here’S Some Malarkey: Judges Are Umpires, Alan E. Garfield

Alan E Garfield

No abstract provided.


Remembering Justice Warren’S Surprising Legacy, Robert Hayman May 2014

Remembering Justice Warren’S Surprising Legacy, Robert Hayman

Robert L. Hayman

No abstract provided.


Instead Of Government Truth Police, A Wiser Course Is Informed Citizenry, Alan E. Garfield Apr 2014

Instead Of Government Truth Police, A Wiser Course Is Informed Citizenry, Alan E. Garfield

Alan E Garfield

No abstract provided.


Neurotechnologies At The Intersection Of Criminal Procedure And Constitutional Law, Amanda C. Pustilnik Apr 2014

Neurotechnologies At The Intersection Of Criminal Procedure And Constitutional Law, Amanda C. Pustilnik

Amanda C Pustilnik

The rapid development of neurotechnologies poses novel constitutional issues for criminal law and criminal procedure. These technologies can identify directly from brain waves whether a person is familiar with a stimulus like a face or a weapon, can model blood flow in the brain to indicate whether a person is lying, and can even interfere with brain processes themselves via high-powered magnets to cause a person to be less likely to lie to an investigator. These technologies implicate the constitutional privilege against compelled, self-incriminating speech under the Fifth Amendment and the right to be free of unreasonable search and seizure …


America's Forgotten Constitutions: Defiant Visions Of Power And Community, Robert Tsai Mar 2014

America's Forgotten Constitutions: Defiant Visions Of Power And Community, Robert Tsai

Robert L Tsai

The U.S. Constitution opens by proclaiming the sovereignty of all citizens: "We the People." Robert Tsai's gripping history of alternative constitutions invites readers into the circle of those who have rejected this ringing assertion--the defiant groups that refused to accept the Constitution's definition of who "the people" are and how their authority should be exercised. America's Forgotten Constitutions is the story of America as told by dissenters: squatters, Native Americans, abolitionists, socialists, internationalists, and racial nationalists. Beginning in the nineteenth century, Tsai chronicles eight episodes in which discontented citizens took the extraordinary step of drafting a new constitution. He examines …


Making The Case For Contraception Over Religious Views, Alan E. Garfield Mar 2014

Making The Case For Contraception Over Religious Views, Alan E. Garfield

Alan E Garfield

No abstract provided.


The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination In Bankruptcy And The Plight Of The Debtor, Timothy R. Tarvin Feb 2014

The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination In Bankruptcy And The Plight Of The Debtor, Timothy R. Tarvin

Timothy R Tarvin

An innocent debtor, who is either ignorant of her constitutional right to the privilege against self-incrimination or ineffectual in asserting it, may find herself wrongfully convicted and imprisoned in a criminal matter, due to unwitting complicity in the delivery of testimony or documents in her bankruptcy case. This lack of understanding poses a serious risk to debtors, and especially affects the increasing number of pro se debtors in bankruptcy.
The privilege extends to debtors in bankruptcy proceedings. However, a debtor who fails to properly invoke the privilege waives her rights. This possibility is made more probable because there is no …


Who Deserves The Right To Decide On Abortion?, Alan E. Garfield Feb 2014

Who Deserves The Right To Decide On Abortion?, Alan E. Garfield

Alan E Garfield

No abstract provided.


Court Considers Space Restrictions On First Amendment, Alan E. Garfield Jan 2014

Court Considers Space Restrictions On First Amendment, Alan E. Garfield

Alan E Garfield

No abstract provided.


The Life And Times Of Targeted Killing, Markus Gunneflo Dec 2013

The Life And Times Of Targeted Killing, Markus Gunneflo

Markus Gunneflo

Against the background of the ongoing shift in the perception of the legality and legitimacy of extraterritorial lethal force in counterterrorism, my doctoral thesis analyses the emergence of so-called “targeted killing” in the history of Israel and the US, as well as in international law. It finds that the relationship between targeted killing and law, particularly international law, is not a straightforward case of more or less determinate and legally binding norms being applied to state measures adopted in situations of insecurity (in this case, those of the second Intifada and 9/11) but rather one of a much longer and …


The Future We Want And Constitutionally Enshrined Procedural Rights In Environmental Matters, James May, Erin Daly Dec 2013

The Future We Want And Constitutionally Enshrined Procedural Rights In Environmental Matters, James May, Erin Daly

Erin Daly

No abstract provided.


Anti-Anti-Evasion In Constitutional Law, Michael B. Kent Jr., Brandon P. Denning Dec 2013

Anti-Anti-Evasion In Constitutional Law, Michael B. Kent Jr., Brandon P. Denning

Michael B. Kent Jr.

No abstract provided.


Constitutional Trespass, Laurent Sacharoff Dec 2013

Constitutional Trespass, Laurent Sacharoff

Laurent Sacharoff

The Supreme Court has recently created a trespass test for Fourth Amendment searches without explaining what type of trespass it envisions—one based on the common law of 1791, on the specific trespass law of the state where the search occurred, or on some other trespass principles. Indeed Florida v. Jardines, decided in 2013, raises the question whether the Court has created a trespass test at all, a seeming turnabout that largely recapitulates the Court’s 125- year history of confusion in which it has embraced, rejected, or simply ignored trespass as a test from era to era or even year to …