Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Intellectual Property Law (38)
- Copyright (15)
- Intellectual Property (13)
- Intellectual property (11)
- Patents (11)
-
- Law and Economics (10)
- Patent Law (10)
- Patent law (10)
- Law and Technology (7)
- Science and Technology (6)
- Antitrust (5)
- Technology (5)
- Biotechnology (4)
- Communications Law (4)
- Economics (4)
- Law and Society (4)
- Patent (4)
- Remedies (4)
- Arts and Entertainment (3)
- Copyright Law (3)
- Copyright law (3)
- First Amendment (3)
- Internet (3)
- Patent trolls (3)
- Presentations (3)
- Privacy (3)
- Sports (3)
- Trademark (3)
- Articles, Intellectual Property Law (2)
- Authors (2)
- Publication
-
- Jonathan M Barnett (9)
- Elizabeth A Rowe (8)
- Oskar Liivak (7)
- Peter K. Yu (7)
- David L. Schwartz (5)
-
- Jeffrey L Harrison (5)
- David S. Olson (4)
- Mark P. McKenna (4)
- Robin C Feldman (4)
- Yaniv Heled (4)
- Francina Cantatore (3)
- Glynn Lunney (3)
- Herbert Hovenkamp (3)
- Lucas S. Osborn (3)
- Michael Risch (3)
- Stephen Yelderman (3)
- Amy L. Landers (2)
- Daniel J Gervais (2)
- Dr Rebecca Giblin (2)
- Dr Tyrone Berger (2)
- Edward Lee (2)
- Jingping Zhang (2)
- Jodi Benassi (2)
- Juan Carlos Riofrío Martínez-Villalba (2)
- Kimberlee G Weatherall (2)
- Mohamed S Abdel Sadek (2)
- Molly K. Land (2)
- Monica Brooks (2)
- Nancy Kim (2)
- Paris Webb (2)
- File Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 152
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Right Not To Use In Property And Patent Law, Oskar Liivak, Eduardo M. Peñalver
The Right Not To Use In Property And Patent Law, Oskar Liivak, Eduardo M. Peñalver
Oskar Liivak
In Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co., the Supreme Court held (1) that patent owners have an absolute right not to practice their patent and (2) that even these nonpracticing patent owners are entitled to the liberal use of injunctive relief against infringers. Both of these holdings have been very important to the viability of patent assertion entities, the so-called patent trolls. In eBay Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C., the Supreme Court softened the injunction rule. In this Article, we argue that Congress or the Court should reconsider Continental Paper Bag’s embrace of an absolute right not to …
Rethinking The Concept Of Exclusion In Patent Law, Oskar Liivak
Rethinking The Concept Of Exclusion In Patent Law, Oskar Liivak
Oskar Liivak
Patent law’s broad exclusionary rule is one of its defining features. It is unique within intellectual property as it prohibits acts of independent creation. Even if a second inventor had no connection or aid from an initial inventor, patent law allows the first inventor to stop the second. Even though a number of pressing problems can be traced to this rule, it remains untouchable; it is thought to be essential for incentivizing invention. But is it really our only choice? And why is it so different from our otherwise widespread reliance on free entry and competition in markets? The current …
Maturing Patent Theory From Industrial Policy To Intellectual Property, Oskar Liivak
Maturing Patent Theory From Industrial Policy To Intellectual Property, Oskar Liivak
Oskar Liivak
We have always known that technological progress is important and this country has always aimed to promote it. A large part of that responsibility has fallen on the shoulders of the patent system. Embarrassingly, despite over two hundred years of experience, we still do not actually know if the patent system helps or hinders technological progress. This Essay argues that the problem is not the patent system but rather patent theory. Patent theory suffers from three linked problems: exceptionalness, indeterminacy, and animosity. First, patent law is seen as a necessarily unique exception to the overall market economy. By artificially making …
Finding Invention, Oskar Liivak
Finding Invention, Oskar Liivak
Oskar Liivak
One of the biggest problems plaguing modern patent law is its inability to provide predictable and clear exclusive rights. We would improve clarity by simply following the patent statute and extending exclusion only to "the patented invention." That suggestion, as reasonable as it may sound, is actually quite radical to the dominant patent law orthodoxy. It is not even clear under the dominant patent law orthodoxy what it would mean to limit patent scope to the invention, but it is generally presumed that it must lead to unacceptably narrow patents. Thus, even if it provides clarity, the invention is thought …
Maintaining Competition In Copying: Narrowing The Scope Of Gene Patents, Oskar Liivak
Maintaining Competition In Copying: Narrowing The Scope Of Gene Patents, Oskar Liivak
Oskar Liivak
In supporting gene patents, the patent office, the courts and other supporters have assumed that gene discoveries are identical to traditional inventions and therefore the patent system should treat them as identical. In other words, they have assumed that the relatively broad claims that are used for traditional inventions are also appropriate for encouraging gene discovery. This article examines this assumption and finds that gene discoveries are critically different from traditional inventions and concludes that the patent system cannot treat them as identical.
As a doctrinal matter, this article applies the generally overlooked constitutional requirements of inventorship and originality and …
Establishing An Island Of Patent Sanity, Oskar Liivak
Establishing An Island Of Patent Sanity, Oskar Liivak
Oskar Liivak
There is a growing, inescapable sense that something has gone terribly wrong with the patent system. The patent system is described as a failure, broken, and dysfunctional. Yet, despite the fact that much of today’s headline-grabbing patent activity appears facially unproductive, we really can’t be sure that the system has failed in its mission. Current patent theory is so indeterminate that it is hard to decisively criticize these activities. In fact, the current narrative cannot conclusively show that patent trolls or any other patent-related activities are or are not economically justified. Though depressing and perhaps embarrassing, this patent indeterminacy is …
The Forgotten Originality Requirement: A Constitutional Hurdle For Gene Patents, Oskar Liivak
The Forgotten Originality Requirement: A Constitutional Hurdle For Gene Patents, Oskar Liivak
Oskar Liivak
Originality has always been a part of patent law. It bars patents that are obtained by copying from someone or from somewhere. Modern judicial interpretations of the patent act have ignored this second element of originality. But as originality is, at least arguably, a constitutional limit of the Patent and Copyright clause, the courts must interpret the patent act consistently to include originality. As a specific example, the paper focuses on patents claiming isolated and purified naturally-occurring gene sequences. The paper concludes that such patents are not original – they are instead just the result of copying – and thus …
Around The Copyright World In 60 Minutes, Peter Yu
When Trade Secrets Become Shackles: Fairness And The Inevitable Disclosure Doctrine, Elizabeth Rowe
When Trade Secrets Become Shackles: Fairness And The Inevitable Disclosure Doctrine, Elizabeth Rowe
Elizabeth A Rowe
Critics of the inevitable disclosure doctrine decry the inconsistency with which courts rule on these cases, and the difficulty in predicting case outcomes. They contend that courts are left to "grapple with a decidedly ... nebulous standard of 'inevitability."' Further, they claim the doctrine undermines the employee's fundamental right to move freely and pursue his or her livelihood. Ultimately, both the problem and solution here are about fairness: fairness in the employer-employee relationship, fairness in the application of the law, and fairness in providing protection from unfair competition between competing employers. The crux of the opposition to the doctrine, in …
Introducing A Takedown For Trade Secrets On The Internet, Elizabeth Rowe
Introducing A Takedown For Trade Secrets On The Internet, Elizabeth Rowe
Elizabeth A Rowe
This Article explores, for the first time, an existing void in trade-secret law. When a trade-secret owner discovers that its trade secrets have been posted on the Internet, there is currently no legislative mechanism by which the owner can request that the information be taken down. The only remedy to effectuate removal of the material is to obtain a court order, usually either a temporary restraining order or a preliminary injunction. When a trade secret appears on the Internet, the owner often loses the ability to continue to claim it as a trade secret and to prevent others from using …
Technology And Intellectual Property: New Rules For An Old Game?, Elizabeth A. Rowe
Technology And Intellectual Property: New Rules For An Old Game?, Elizabeth A. Rowe
Elizabeth A Rowe
This foreword to the first issue of 2009 for the Journal of Technology Law and Policy discusses the questions presented by the merger of technology and intellectual property and considers how best the two areas should co-exist.
The Experimental Use Exception To Patent Infringement: Do Universities Deserve Special Treatment?, Elizabeth A. Rowe
The Experimental Use Exception To Patent Infringement: Do Universities Deserve Special Treatment?, Elizabeth A. Rowe
Elizabeth A Rowe
The experimental use exception is a common law exception to the patent-holder's exclusive right of use. It permits the use of another's patented device when such use is for philosophical inquiry, curiosity, or amusement. It has recently come under attack by many who consider it too narrow. They fear that the courts' "narrowing" of the experimental use exception will stifle research and innovation. Much of the discontent with the doctrine has been spurred by a relatively recent Federal Circuit opinion, Madey v. Duke University, which makes clear that a research university does not receive immunity under the experimental use exception …
Patents, Genetically Modified Foods, And Ip Overreaching, Elizabeth A. Rowe
Patents, Genetically Modified Foods, And Ip Overreaching, Elizabeth A. Rowe
Elizabeth A Rowe
Genetically engineered plants and animals have become and will continue to constitute a large part of the food we consume. The United States is the world's largest producer of genetically modified foods, making American consumers the most exposed population to these products. Agricultural biotechnology patents spur and support innovation. Accordingly, patent law is one of the main contributors to this phenomenon that has changed not only the kinds of food we eat, but the nature of the agri-business industry that produces these foods. This Article takes on an area of concern involving the patenting of food that has remained unexplored: …
Trade Secret Litigation And Free Speech: Is It Time To Restrain The Plaintiffs?, Elizabeth A. Rowe
Trade Secret Litigation And Free Speech: Is It Time To Restrain The Plaintiffs?, Elizabeth A. Rowe
Elizabeth A Rowe
Trade secret misappropriation litigation is often criticized for its negative effects on competition and speech. In particular, some accuse plaintiff trade secret owners of filing complaints for the purpose of running competitors out of business, or restraining individuals from discussing matters which are unfavorable. This Article enters the discussion to critically assess whether there is reason to consider restricting these actions. It concludes that trade secret litigation on the whole does not inappropriately impinge on speech rights. Even if certain cases come closer to offending defendants' free speech rights, these occasions and the concerns they raise are not unique to …
Saving Trade Secret Disclosures On The Internet Through Sequential Preservation, Elizabeth A. Rowe
Saving Trade Secret Disclosures On The Internet Through Sequential Preservation, Elizabeth A. Rowe
Elizabeth A Rowe
When an employee discloses an employer's trade secrets to the public over the Internet, does our current trade secret framework appropriately address the consequences of that disclosure? What ought to be the rule that governs whether the trade secret owner has lost not only the protection status for the secret, but also any remedies against use by third parties? Should the ease with which the Internet permits instant and mass disclosure of secrets be taken into consideration in assessing the fairness of a rule that calls for immediate loss of the trade secret upon disclosure? Given that trade secret law …
Striking A Balance: When Should Trade-Secret Law Shield Disclosures To The Government?, Elizabeth Rowe
Striking A Balance: When Should Trade-Secret Law Shield Disclosures To The Government?, Elizabeth Rowe
Elizabeth A Rowe
In 2010, Toyota issued recalls on over eight million vehicles because of faulty acceleration. Assume that the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) requests that Toyota allow the government access to the data in black boxes on the recalled cars. The black boxes are operated by proprietary software and can only be accessed with special codes by Toyota. Assume further that Toyota refuses to provide the Black Box data to the government, claiming that it would reveal its trade secrets. How should courts approach what I coin these refusal-to-submit cases? There is a void in the literature and the case …
Trolls Or Great Inventors: Case Studies Of Patent Assertion Entities, Ryan Holte
Trolls Or Great Inventors: Case Studies Of Patent Assertion Entities, Ryan Holte
Prof. Ryan T. Holte
There has been much debate about the economic harms caused by patent infringement lawsuits filed by patent holders who do not make or sell products covered by their own patents—entities pejoratively referred to as “patent trolls.” This debate has thus far been largely theoretical or based on broad industry-wide data. The purpose of this article is to present a focused empirical report that has previously been lacking—detailed information regarding the inventors themselves, the patent assertion entities (PAEs) that represent them, and the stories behind their patents. The research for this article centers on two instructive case studies: (1) MercExchange, L.L.C., …
The Comparative Economics Of International Intellectual Property Agreements, Peter Yu
The Comparative Economics Of International Intellectual Property Agreements, Peter Yu
Peter K. Yu
No abstract provided.
A Positive Externalities Approach To Copyright Law: Theory And Application, Jeffrey L. Harrison
A Positive Externalities Approach To Copyright Law: Theory And Application, Jeffrey L. Harrison
Jeffrey L Harrison
The basic goal of copyright law is, at a general level, fairly well understood, yet the law itself seems untethered to any consistent analytical approach designed to achieve that goal. This Article has two goals. The first is to explain in some detail what copyright law might look like if it reflected economic reasoning. The second is to put to the test the question of whether copyright law is as far out of sync with economic guidelines as White-Smith Music and Eldred suggest. In order to understand the economic approach and the inconsistency of copyright law, as well as the …
Privacy, Copyright, And Letters, Jeffrey Harrison
Privacy, Copyright, And Letters, Jeffrey Harrison
Jeffrey L Harrison
The focus of this Essay is the privacy of letters – the written manifestations of thoughts, intents, and the recollections of facts directed to a person or a narrowly defined audience. The importance of this privacy is captured in the novel Atonement by Ian McEwan and in the film based on the novel. The fulcrum from which the action springs is a letter that is read by someone to whom it was not addressed. The result is literally life-changing, even disastrous for a number of characters. One person dies, two people seemingly meant for each other are torn apart and …
Rationalizing The Allocative/Distributive Relationship In Copyright, Jeffrey L. Harrison
Rationalizing The Allocative/Distributive Relationship In Copyright, Jeffrey L. Harrison
Jeffrey L Harrison
It is the position of this article that the benefits of a regime of copyright law can be maintained while shedding at least some of the wastefulness of monopolistic competition. This article cuts against the grain of modem copyright law by making the case that a more substantive approach to the issues of creativity and authorship would lower costs, streamline the system, and raise the level of socially beneficial creativity. In Section II, I will elaborate on the allocative/distributive distinction and their interconnectedness. In Section III, I will focus on an enhanced creativity standard and argue that an elevated standard …
Deconstructing And Reconstructing Hot News: Toward A Functional Approach, Jeffrey L. Harrison, Robyn Shelton
Deconstructing And Reconstructing Hot News: Toward A Functional Approach, Jeffrey L. Harrison, Robyn Shelton
Jeffrey L Harrison
Hot news is factual, time-sensitive information ranging from baseball scores to the outbreak of war. In recent years, hot news has found its own niche among legal scholars and courts. When deconstructed, though, hot news is simply information and, like most information, it has a public good character. The problem ultimately is that news is non-excludable and non-rivalrous – discoverers or creators of hot news cannot exclude others from using the news and hot news is not destroyed when used. This means it may be produced at levels that are less than optimal.The critical element in hot news is lead …
Trademark Law And Status Signaling: Tattoos For The Privileged, Jeffrey L. Harrison
Trademark Law And Status Signaling: Tattoos For The Privileged, Jeffrey L. Harrison
Jeffrey L Harrison
The motivations for buying a good or service are highly complex. At the most basic level, people buy goods because of what the goods do or because of the aesthetic elements they embody. More technically, buyers derive utility from the "functional" quality of these goods. Another motivation relates to what the goods "say" about the buyer. Here, the good is a signaling device. Signaling is not new, of course, and can indicate anything from social class to political leanings. This Essay addresses the issue of whether it should be public policy to subsidize this type of person-to-person status signaling. This …
Monopolization, Innovation, And Consumer Welfare, John Lopatka, William Page
Monopolization, Innovation, And Consumer Welfare, John Lopatka, William Page
William H. Page
While most commentators and the enforcement agencies voice support for the consumer welfare standard, substantial disagreement exists over when economic theory justifies a presumption of consumer injury. Virtually all would subscribe to the theoretical prediction that an effective cartel will likely inflict consumer injury by reducing output and thus increasing prices. But the academic and judicial consensus disappears when the theory at issue predicts that a practice -- a merger or a predatory pricing campaign, for example -- will harm consumers in the future through some complex sequence of events.
In our view, the desire to protect innovation is legitimate, …
The Right Not To Use In Property And Patent Law, Oskar Liivak, Eduardo M. Peñalver
The Right Not To Use In Property And Patent Law, Oskar Liivak, Eduardo M. Peñalver
Eduardo M. Peñalver
In Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co., the Supreme Court held (1) that patent owners have an absolute right not to practice their patent and (2) that even these nonpracticing patent owners are entitled to the liberal use of injunctive relief against infringers. Both of these holdings have been very important to the viability of patent assertion entities, the so-called patent trolls. In eBay Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C., the Supreme Court softened the injunction rule. In this Article, we argue that Congress or the Court should reconsider Continental Paper Bag’s embrace of an absolute right not to …
Enforcement: A New, Overlooked Member Of The Intellectual Property Family?, Peter Yu
Enforcement: A New, Overlooked Member Of The Intellectual Property Family?, Peter Yu
Peter K. Yu
No abstract provided.
Teoría General De Los Signos Distintivos, Juan Carlos Riofrío Martínez-Villalba
Teoría General De Los Signos Distintivos, Juan Carlos Riofrío Martínez-Villalba
Juan Carlos Riofrío Martínez-Villalba
La presente investigación delinea de forma sistemática una teoría general para todo género de signos distintivos. Para este propósito se vale de las investigaciones parciales que la propiedad industrial y otras ramas del derecho han realizado de algunos signos distintivos particulares, como las marcas, las indicaciones geográficas, los sellos de calidad, los nombres de pila, los nombres comerciales, entre otros. Se usa un método inductivo que recoge leyes, jurisprudencia y doctrina de varios lugares del mundo. En cuanto a la estructura, luego de una introducción, se determinar cuál es el conjunto de los signos distintivos que será el universo a …
Patent Regimes And The Right To Science And Culture Workshop, Peter Yu
Patent Regimes And The Right To Science And Culture Workshop, Peter Yu
Peter K. Yu
No abstract provided.
On Patenting Human Organisms Or How The Abortion Wars Feed Into The Ownership Fallacy, Yaniv Heled
On Patenting Human Organisms Or How The Abortion Wars Feed Into The Ownership Fallacy, Yaniv Heled
Yaniv Heled
The idea of ominous technologies that put human individuals or parts of their bodies under someone else's control has been stirring emotions and terrifying people for centuries. It was a recent offshoot of this idea--the notion of “patenting humans”--that mobilized certain members of Congress to pass legislation prohibiting the issuance of patent claims “directed to or encompassing a human organism.” The values underlying this legislation may well have been agreeable, even admirable. Yet, the actual motivation for it was misguided; its execution, deeply flawed; its potential outcomes, hazardous
This Article reviews the history and background of this prohibition. It fleshes …
The Right To Parody, Peter Yu