Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Criminal Law and Procedure (25)
- Constitutional Law (14)
- Criminal Law (14)
- Terrorism (12)
- Fourth Amendment (10)
-
- International Law (10)
- Death penalty (9)
- Law and Society (8)
- Criminal law (7)
- Evidence (7)
- Human Rights Law (7)
- Child abuse (6)
- Child neglect (5)
- Criminal Procedure (5)
- Criminal liability (5)
- Jurisprudence (5)
- Privacy (5)
- Privacy; Surveillance; United States v. Jones (5)
- Punishment (5)
- 4th amendment (4)
- A. Publications in Peer-reviewed Journals (4)
- Capital punishment (4)
- Child maltreatment (4)
- Child psychology (4)
- Child witnesses (4)
- Criminal Theory (4)
- Death Penalty (4)
- Derecho Penal (4)
- Immigration Law (4)
- Innocence (4)
- Publication
-
- Robert Bloom (11)
- Mark A. Drumbl (10)
- Erik Luna (9)
- Thomas D. Lyon (6)
- Sharon Dolovich (5)
-
- Jimmy Gurule (4)
- José Balcázar Quiroz (4)
- Mahdev Mohan (4)
- Mary Holper (4)
- R. Michael Cassidy (4)
- Robert M. Sanger (4)
- Stephen F. Smith (4)
- Danielle Keats Citron (3)
- David C. Gray (3)
- Dr. Saumya Uma (3)
- Ken Levy (3)
- Lucian E Dervan (3)
- Stefan D Cassella (3)
- Charles D Weisselberg (2)
- Daniel S. Medwed (2)
- David I. Bruck (2)
- Harold J. Krent (2)
- Jennifer Daskal (2)
- Mary Ellen O'Connell (2)
- Rebecca Sharpless (2)
- Richard Daniel Klein (2)
- Vladislava Stoyanova (2)
- . (1)
- Alan Raphael (1)
- Andrea L Roth (1)
- File Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 184
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Solution To The Real Blackmail Paradox: The Common Link Between Blackmail And Other Criminal Threats, Ken Levy
Ken Levy
Disclosure of true but reputation-damaging information is generally legal. But threats to disclose true but reputation-damaging information unless payment is made are generally criminal. Most scholars think that this situation is paradoxical because it seems to involve illegality mysteriously arising out of legality, a criminal act mysteriously arising out of an independently legal threat to disclose conjoined with an independently legal demand for money. But this is not quite right. The real paradox raised by the different legal statuses of blackmail threats to disclose and disclosure itself involves a contradiction between our strong intuition that blackmail threats should be criminal …
Criminalizing Revenge Porn, Danielle Keats Citron, Mary Anne Franks
Criminalizing Revenge Porn, Danielle Keats Citron, Mary Anne Franks
Danielle Keats Citron
Violations of sexual privacy, notably the non-consensual publication of sexually graphic images in violation of someone's trust, deserve criminal punishment. They deny subjects' ability to decide if and when they are sexually exposed to the public and undermine trust needed for intimate relationships. Then too they produce grave emotional and dignitary harms, exact steep financial costs, and increase the risks of physical assault. A narrowly and carefully crafted criminal statute can comport with the First Amendment. The criminalization of revenge porn is necessary to protect against devastating privacy invasions that chill self-expression and ruin lives.
Do Experience Tables Matter, Peter B. Hoffman, Harvey M. Goldstein
Do Experience Tables Matter, Peter B. Hoffman, Harvey M. Goldstein
Peter R. Hoffman
No abstract provided.
Immigration Policing And Federalism Through The Lens Of Technology, Surveillance, And Privacy, Anil Kalhan
Immigration Policing And Federalism Through The Lens Of Technology, Surveillance, And Privacy, Anil Kalhan
Anil Kalhan
With the deployment of technology, federal programs to enlist state and local police assistance with immigration enforcement are undergoing a sea change. For example, even as it forcefully has urged invalidation of Arizona’s S.B. 1070 and similar state laws, the Obama administration has presided over the largest expansion of state and local immigration policing in U.S. history with its implementation of the “Secure Communities” program, which integrates immigration and criminal history database systems in order to automatically ascertain the immigration status of every individual who is arrested and booked by state and local police nationwide. By 2012, over one fifth …
The Fda And The Ftc Join Forces,, Robert Sanger
The Fda And The Ftc Join Forces,, Robert Sanger
Robert M. Sanger
To those of us in the trenches dealing with civil and criminal enforcement of government regulation, it is not surprising that more than one federal agency will join in an investigation. Sometimes this takes the form of a “tag along” where, for instance, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) may follow up on a Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) white collar fraud case to assert the claim that taxes were not paid on the ill-gotten proceeds of the transaction. There are other cases where two federal agencies both attempt to take the lead in an investigation and clash in a “turf” …
12. Interviewing Victims And Suspected Victims Who Are Reluctant To Talk., Irit Irit Hershkowitz, Michael E. Lamb, Thomas D. Lyon
12. Interviewing Victims And Suspected Victims Who Are Reluctant To Talk., Irit Irit Hershkowitz, Michael E. Lamb, Thomas D. Lyon
Thomas D. Lyon
Prosecutorial Decriminalization, Erik Luna
Prosecutorial Decriminalization, Erik Luna
Erik Luna
The article discusses the legal concept of prosecutorial decriminalization in the U.S. as of July 2012, focusing on an analysis of the use of criminal laws to enforce the public standards of morality in America. Penal codes and criminal sanctions are addressed, along with several reform measures aimed at restructuring a criminal law system in the U.S. which has reportedly been overburdened by overcriminalization. The use of the American judiciary system as a check on overcriminalization is mentioned.
Effective Assistance Of Counsel: In Quest Of A Uniform Standard Of Review, Theresa L. Springmann, John Eric Smithburn
Effective Assistance Of Counsel: In Quest Of A Uniform Standard Of Review, Theresa L. Springmann, John Eric Smithburn
J. Eric Smithburn
No abstract provided.
The Supreme Court And The Politics Of Death, Stephen F. Smith
The Supreme Court And The Politics Of Death, Stephen F. Smith
Stephen F. Smith
This article explores the evolving role of the U.S. Supreme Court in the politics of death. By constitutionalizing the death penalty in the 1970s, the Supreme Court unintentionally set into motion political forces that have seriously undermined the Court's vision of a death penalty that is fairly administered and imposed only on the worst offenders. With the death penalty established as a highly salient political issue, politicians - legislators, prosecutors, and governors - have strong institutional incentives to make death sentences easier to achieve and carry out. The result of this vicious cycle is not only more executions, but less …
Proportional Mens Rea, Stephen F. Smith
Jail For Juvenile Child Pornographers?: A Reply To Professor Leary, Stephen F. Smith
Jail For Juvenile Child Pornographers?: A Reply To Professor Leary, Stephen F. Smith
Stephen F. Smith
No abstract provided.
Proportionality And Federalization, Stephen F. Smith
Proportionality And Federalization, Stephen F. Smith
Stephen F. Smith
No abstract provided.
Responses To The Ten Questions, Mary Ellen O'Connell
Responses To The Ten Questions, Mary Ellen O'Connell
Mary Ellen O'Connell
No abstract provided.
Enhancing The Status Of Non-State Actors Through A Global War On Terror?, Mary Ellen O'Connell
Enhancing The Status Of Non-State Actors Through A Global War On Terror?, Mary Ellen O'Connell
Mary Ellen O'Connell
Soon after September 11, President Bush declared a global war on terrorism and members of terrorist groups "combatants." These declarations are not only generally inconsistent with international law; they also reverse the trend regarding the legal status of international non-state actors. For decades, law-abiding non-state actors, such as international humanitarian aid organizations, enjoyed ever-expanding rights on the international plane. Professor Schachter observed how this trend came at the expense of the nation-state. He also predicted, however, that the nation-state would not fade away any time soon. And, by the late Twentieth Century, the trend toward enhanced status was noticeably slowing. …
The Voice Of Reason—Why Recent Judicial Interpretations Of The Antiterrorism And Effective Death Penalty Act’S Restrictions On Habeas Corpus Are Wrong, Judith L. Ritter
The Voice Of Reason—Why Recent Judicial Interpretations Of The Antiterrorism And Effective Death Penalty Act’S Restrictions On Habeas Corpus Are Wrong, Judith L. Ritter
Judith L Ritter
By filing a petition for a federal writ of habeas corpus, a prisoner initiates a legal proceeding collateral to the direct appeals process. Federal statutes set forth the procedure and parameters of habeas corpus review. The Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) first signed into law by President Clinton in 1996, included significant cut-backs in the availability of federal writs of habeas corpus. This was by congressional design. Yet, despite the dire predictions, for most of the first decade of AEDPA’s reign, the door to habeas relief remained open. More recently, however, the Supreme Court reinterpreted a key portion …
Rage Against The Machine: A Reply To Professors Bierschbach And Bibas, Erik Luna
Rage Against The Machine: A Reply To Professors Bierschbach And Bibas, Erik Luna
Erik Luna
The article presents a response to the article by Professor Albert Alschuler on the administrative rulemaking in criminal law enforcement and guiding the power which was wielded by criminal justice officials. It mentions that the increase in the rate of the punishment given to the convicts is less effective in reducing the crime and enhancing public safety. It informs that bureaucratization can be considered as the means to improve the criminal process in the U.S.
Correcting A Fatal Lottery: A Proposal To Apply The Civil Discrimination Standards To The Death Penalty, Joseph Thomas
Correcting A Fatal Lottery: A Proposal To Apply The Civil Discrimination Standards To The Death Penalty, Joseph Thomas
Joseph Thomas
Claims of discrimination are treated differently in the death penalty context. Discrimination in employment, housing, civil rights and jury venire all use a burden-shifting framework with the preponderance of the evidence as the standard. Discrimination that occurs in death penalty proceedings is the exception to the rule -- the framework offers less protections; there is only one phase of argumentation, with a heightened evidentiary standard of “exceptionally clear proof.” With disparate levels of protections against discrimination, the standard and framework for adjudicating claims of discrimination in the death penalty is unconstitutional.
Death is different as a punishment. But does discrimination …
Recent Landmark Criminal Law Decisions Of The Supreme Court: The Jurisprudence Of The Supreme Court: Fair Trial, Juvenile Justice, The Death Penalty, And The Right To Counsel, Richard Klein
Richard Daniel Klein
The Supreme Court has recently adjudicated some crucial issues regarding criminal matters and constitutional jurisprudence. The Court expanded the constitutional authority vested in Congress, provided defendants with constitutional remedies and protections, indicated that even a substantial amount of publicity surrounding a trial does not warrant a change of venue, left defense attorneys in awe of their new-found obligations, and settled important divisions among the U.S. circuit courts of appeal. Skilling v. U.S. revealed that a change of venue based on a claim of a tainted jury pool presents a difficult, if not impossible task, for criminal defendants. Padilla expanded the …
Gridland: An Allegorical Critique Of Federal Sentencing, Erik Luna
Gridland: An Allegorical Critique Of Federal Sentencing, Erik Luna
Erik Luna
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Road Maps, Erik Luna
Defining Extortion: Rico, Hobbs, And Statutory Interpretation In Scheidler V. National Organization For Women, Inc., 123 S. Ct. 1057 (2003), Daniel B. Kelly
Defining Extortion: Rico, Hobbs, And Statutory Interpretation In Scheidler V. National Organization For Women, Inc., 123 S. Ct. 1057 (2003), Daniel B. Kelly
Daniel B Kelly
No abstract provided.
Introduction: The Ancient Roots Of Modern Forfeiture Law, Jimmy Gurule
Introduction: The Ancient Roots Of Modern Forfeiture Law, Jimmy Gurule
Jimmy Gurule
No abstract provided.
Does "Proceeds" Really Mean "Net Profits"? The Supreme Court's Efforts To Diminish The Utility Of The Federal Money Laundering Statute, Jimmy Gurule
Jimmy Gurule
No abstract provided.
Unfunding Terror - Perspectives On Unfunding Terror (Panel One), Jimmy Gurule
Unfunding Terror - Perspectives On Unfunding Terror (Panel One), Jimmy Gurule
Jimmy Gurule
According to the FBI, the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks against the World Trade Center and the Pentagon that claimed the lives of 2,973 innocent civilians required as much as $500,000 to stage. At the time, al Qaeda, the jihadi terrorist organization responsible for the mass killings, was operating on an annual budget between $30 and $50 million. However, despite the obvious fact that terrorists need money to support their terrorist operations and organizational infrastructure, prior to 9/11, preventing the financing of terrorism was not a priority for the United States or international community. Moreover, a comprehensive legal framework to …
The Money Laundering Control Act Of 1986: Creating A New Federal Offense Or Merely Affording Federal Prosecutors An Alternative Means Of Punishing Specified Unlawful Activity?, Jimmy Gurule
Jimmy Gurule
No abstract provided.
Depravity Thrice Removed: Using The 'Heinous, Cruel, Or Depraved' Factor To Aggravate Convictions Of Nontriggermen Accomplices In Capital Cases, Richard W. Garnett
Depravity Thrice Removed: Using The 'Heinous, Cruel, Or Depraved' Factor To Aggravate Convictions Of Nontriggermen Accomplices In Capital Cases, Richard W. Garnett
Richard W Garnett
No abstract provided.
Labor Racketeering And Labor Law: State Regulation V. Federal Rights: An Analysis Of Brown V. Hotel And Restaurant Employees Union Local 54, Barbara J. Fick
Labor Racketeering And Labor Law: State Regulation V. Federal Rights: An Analysis Of Brown V. Hotel And Restaurant Employees Union Local 54, Barbara J. Fick
Barbara J. Fick
This article previews the Supreme Court case Brown v. Hotel and Restaurant Employees, 468 U.S. 491 (1984). The author expected the Court to decide which interest prevails where there is a conflict between New Jersey's regulation of labor unions in order to reduce the influence of organized crime in the labor sector and federally granted rights to organize and bargain collectively.
Headline Kidnappings And The Origins Of The Lindbergh Law, Barry Cushman
Headline Kidnappings And The Origins Of The Lindbergh Law, Barry Cushman
Barry Cushman
No abstract provided.
Pretrial And Preventive Detention Of Suspected Terrorists: Options And Constraints Under International Law, Douglass Cassel
Pretrial And Preventive Detention Of Suspected Terrorists: Options And Constraints Under International Law, Douglass Cassel
Douglass Cassel
No abstract provided.
The Order-Maintenance Agenda As Land Use Policy, Nicole Stelle Garnett
The Order-Maintenance Agenda As Land Use Policy, Nicole Stelle Garnett
Nicole Stelle Garnett
Debates about the broken windows hypothesis focus almost exclusively on whether the order-maintenance agenda represents wise criminal law policy — specifically on whether, when, and at what cost, order-maintenance policing techniques reduce serious crime. These questions are important, but incomplete. This Essay, which was solicited for a symposium on urban-development policy, considers potential benefits of order-maintenance policies other than crime-reduction, especially reducing the fear of crime. The Broken Windows essay itself urged that attention to disorder was important not just because disorder was a precursor to more serious crime, but also because disorder undermined residents’ sense of security. The later …