Law Commons^™

Towards A Proper Juvenile Justice System In Bangladesh From A Cluttered One: An Analytical Overture On Focusing Human Rights Perspective, Zafrin Andaleeb, Abu Noman Mohammad Atahar Ali, Abu Saleh Md. Tofazzel Haque

Abu Noman Mohammad Atahar Ali

No abstract provided.

Some Thoughts On Achieving U.S. Compliance With International Obligation To Inform Other Nations About Arrest Of Their Citizens, Talbot D'Alemberte

Talbot D'Alemberte

The Avena decision against the United States by the World Court again tarnishes the reputation of the United States in the international human rights community but some relatively simple steps could bring this country into compliance with its treaty obligations to inform foreign nationals of their rights under the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations.

The article suggests that private economic action might be effective yet, to avoid that step, the problem can be corrected through legislation, through use of Miranda warnings and through notice given at arraignment.

Between Rogues And Liberals: Towards Value Pluralism As A Theory Of Freedom Of Religion In International Law, Peter G. Danchin

Peter G. Danchin

No abstract provided.

The Duty Of Treatment: Human Rights And The Hiv/Aids Pandemic, Noah B. Novogrodsky

Noah B Novogrodsky

This article argues that the treatment of HIV and AIDS is spawning a juridical, advocacy and enforcement revolution. The intersection of AIDS and human rights was once characterized almost exclusively by anti-discrimination and destigmatization efforts. Today, human rights advocates are demanding life-saving treatment and convincing courts and legislatures to make states pay for it. Using a comparative Constitutional law methodology that places domestic courts at the center of the struggle for HIV treatment, this article shows how the provision of AIDS medications is reframing the right to health and the implementation of socio-economic rights. First, it locates an emerging right …

Clitoridectomy And The Economics Of Islamic Marriage & Divorce Law, Ryan M. Riegg

Ryan M. Riegg

Troubled Indictments At The Special Court For Sierra Leone: The Pleading Of Joint Criminal Enterprise And Sex-Based Crimes, Cecily E. Rose

Cecily E. Rose

This article argues that the indictments at the Special Court for Sierra Leone have pleaded joint criminal enterprise and sex-based crimes in ways that threaten the rights of the accused to notice of the charges against them. While the Taylor Indictment neglects to outline the purpose of the joint criminal enterprise in which the accused allegedly took part, the Prosecution’s recent arguments in this respect have further confused the matter. In addition, the RUF and AFRC Indictments alleged forced marriage without clearly indicating what crime such conduct would violate. Although the Appeals Chamber provided guidance on the issues of joint …

Boumediene V. Bush And Guantánamo, Cuba: Does The "Empire Strike Back"?, Ernesto A. Hernandez

Ernesto A. Hernandez

Focusing on the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Boumediene v. Bush (2008) and the U.S. occupation of the Naval Station at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, this article argues that the base’s legal anomaly heavily influences “War on Terror” detention jurisprudence. Anomaly is created by agreements between the U.S. and Cuba in 1903 and 1934. They affirm that the U.S. lacks sovereignty over Guantánamo but retains “complete jurisdiction and control” for an indefinite period; while Cuba has “ultimate sovereignty.” Gerald Neuman labels this as an anomalous zone with fundamental legal rules locally suspended. The base was chosen as a detention center because …

The Right To Privacy And America's Aging Population, Kristine Knaplund

Kristine Knaplund

As the number of elderly grows significantly, especially those with cognitive impairments, how do we as a society deal with their need for privacy and intimate association? Two critical issues have so far gone unaddressed in the legal literature: the lack of personal freedom suffered by those who move into large assisted living facilities and nursing homes, versus the lack of social support for those who remain in their own homes. While seniors in nursing homes are lectured and ridiculed, even transferred involuntarily, for having a sexual relationship, elderly living alone are being preyed upon by unscrupulous caregivers who know …

Creating A Torture Culture, Alan Clarke

Alan Clarke

Creating a Torture Culture explores how a culture of torture came about and how the Administration seeks to justify its actions in creating "alternative interrogation techniques."

Human Rights, Humanitarian Law And The "War On Terrorism" In Afghanistan, Peter G. Danchin

Peter G. Danchin

No abstract provided.

Of Prophets And Proselytes: Freedom Of Religion And The Conflict Of Rights In International Law, Peter G. Danchin

Peter G. Danchin

The case of proselytism presents a tangle of competing claims: on the one hand, the rights of proselytizers to free exercise of religion and freedom of speech; on the other hand, the rights of targets of proselytism to change their religion, peacefully to have or maintain a particular religious tradition, and to be free from injury to religious feelings. Clashes between these claims of right are today generating acute tensions in relations between States and peoples, a state of affairs starkly illustrated by the recent Danish cartoons controversy. Irrespective of their resolution in any particular domestic legal system, how should …

Beyond Rationalism And Instrumentalism: The Case For Rethinking U.S. Engagement With International Law And Organization, Peter G. Danchin

Peter G. Danchin

This Essay advances an argument for rethinking the current terms of engagement of U.S. foreign policy with international law and institutions so as to avoid the current two extremes of power politics and imperial moralizing. First, it is necessary to distinguish between force and the status of political domination on the one hand, and consensus and the status of normative meaning on the other. While it may be possible for a superpower to exercise factual authority and control over foreign states and peoples through sheer assertions of force and will, the attainability of such a situation should not be confused …

Religion, Religious Minorities And Human Rights: An Introduction, Peter G. Danchin

Peter G. Danchin

No abstract provided.

Rethinking Johnson V. M’Intosh (1823): The Root Of The Continued Forced Displacement Of American Indians Despite Cobell V. Norton (2001), T S. Twibell

Ty Twibell

A Charade Of Change: Qisas And Diyat Ordinance Allows Honor Killings To Go Unpunished In Pakistan, Stephanie Palo

Stephanie Palo

This article begins with the story of Samia Sarwar. At age 17, Samia was forced to marry her cousin by arranged marriage. After enduring years of abuse, she hoped to obtain a divorce and sought the advice of her parents. Instead of advice, her parents threatened her life. While her parents were making their Hajj pilgrimage, Samia fled and met with human rights lawyer, Hina Jilani. While visiting in her offices, Samia was shot dead by an assassin hired by her parents.

Even though there is no doubt that Samia Sarwar was murdered, the current law in Pakistan has allowed …

Oy Vey! The Bernstein Exception: Rethinking The Doctrine In The Wake Of Constitutional Abuses, Corporate Malfeasance And The “War On Terror”, Breana Frankel

Breana Frankel

Abstract OY VEY! THE BERNSTEIN EXCEPTION: RETHINKING THE DOCTRINE IN THE WAKE OF CONSTITUTIONAL ABUSES, CORPORATE MALFEASANCE AND THE “WAR ON TERROR” Breana Frankel, Assistant Professor, Chapman University School of Law The “Bernstein doctrine” is a classic example of the exception swallowing the rule. The Bernstein exception allows the Executive to intercede in act of state cases when it determines that adjudication would not harm U.S.-foreign relations. The Exception was initially intended solely to permit victims of Nazi war crimes to recover in United States courts. However, in the more than 50 years since its inception, the Bernstein doctrine has …

Law Of No Gods, No Masters – Developing And Defending A Participatory Legal System, Matt Halling

Matt Halling

This article develops and analyzes a new legal vision consistent with recent activist literature about a participatory society. A participatory society (in this context) consists of collectively owned property, has no centralized state, and attempts to maximize citizen participation in politics. Rather than nation states, society is structured as a federation of councils deliberating and coordinating with each other to solve political issues. Participatory society’s structure demands a “participatory law” be developed to manage it, and this article attempts to develop the overarching features of such a system. Once the basic legal model is outlined, the article then looks for …

The World Bank's Inspection Panel: Promoting True Accountability Through Arbitration, Enrique Carrasco

Enrique R Carrasco

In September 1993, the World Bank created the Inspection Panel. At the time, it was hailed as an unprecedented effort to increase the Bank’s accountability. Prior to the establishment of the Panel, the Bank had engaged in a number of projects that devastated local populations and caused significant environmental damage. After unrelenting pressure from environmental and human rights non-governmental organizations (“NGOs”), the World Bank established the Inspection Panel with hopes of bringing transparency to the Bank’s project lending. Generally, the Panel is charged with investigating complaints filed by parties in borrower countries who believe that the Bank is violating its …

"Can Tax Policy Stop Human Trafficking?", Diane Fahey

Diane L. Fahey

ABSTRACT

Can Tax Policy Stop Human Trafficking?

The total number of victims who are held in captivity to perform forced labor at any one time is estimated to be as high as twenty-seven million. That would be equivalent to every man, woman, and child in the states of New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, and New York being held in captivity and forced twelve to fourteen hours each day to labor in sweatshops, or toil as agricultural workers, or service sexually many customers every day with no hope that it will ever end except by death. They would live in crowded, dirty …

All The World’S A Stage, But Admission Is Limited: The Need For A Standardized Ticketing Policy For Patrons With Disabilities, Deborah Brightman

Deborah Brightman Morse

Live events, including theater, concerts, and athletics, are a popular form of entertainment in the United States. Many of these events are open to the public through general ticket sales which tend to function through basic sales practices. However, these practices often do not consider patrons with disabilities who require additional accommodations in order to enjoy live events. For almost twenty years, entertainment arenas, theaters, and stadiums have been actively attempting to create more accessible venues for patrons with disabilities in an effort to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Nonetheless, patrons with disabilities still encounter accessibility barriers – …

The Petrochina Syndrome: Regulating Capital Markets In The Anti-Globalization Era, Stephen F. Diamond

Stephen F. Diamond

This article argues that the process of globalization has generated a legitimation deficit that can be the source of wasteful, even destructive, social and political conflict. I stylize this outcome as "the PetroChina Syndrome," after a leading example of the kind of activity generated in response to globalization, the PetroChina Campaign, where a coalition of labor, human rights, environmental, anti-slavery and religious groups worked together to oppose the initial public offering of a major Chinese oil company led by Goldman Sachs. The article begins with a discussion of this important but largely unexplored dimension of the anti-globalization era triggered by …

Hostile Public Accommodations Laws And The First Amendment, Daniel Koontz

Daniel Koontz

State and municipal Human Rights Commissions have recently begun aggressively interpreting public accommodations laws to punish the speech of proprietors of bars, restaurants, country clubs, and other public accommodations. The theory is that if a proprietor says something to a customer—or even displays artwork, decorations, or signs—that could potentially offend the customer based on race, religion, sex, or ancestry, the proprietor has created a “hostile environment” which denies the customer “full and equal enjoyment” of the public accommodation.

Proprietors can face liability even in the absence of allegations that they refused service to a customer. In one case, a human …

Law School Legends On Audio Cd: Immigration Law, Michael Scaperlanda

Michael A. Scaperlanda

No abstract provided.

Final Version: The Case For The Genetic Parent: Stanley, Quilloin, Caban, Lehr, And Michael H. Revisited, Anthony Miller

Anthony Miller

Does a genetic parent have right to exercise the fundamental rights which the United States Constitution affords parents? If a lesbian couple has a child with one woman donating the ova, which is artificially inseminated and implanted in the other woman, is the donor woman a mother under the Constitution? If sometime in the future a heterosexual couple has a child through the process if in vitro fertilization and through the use of an artificial womb, would the woman and man be the child’s mother and father for constitutional purposes? While the United States Supreme Court has recognized that parents …

Liars And Terrorists And Judges, Oh My: Moral Panic And The Symbolic Politics Of Appellate Review In Asylum Cases, Eric M. Fink

Eric M Fink

As part of the REAL ID Act, Congress amended the Immigration and Nationality Act to restrict judicial review of adverse credibility determinations by immigration judges. The change came in the wake of controversy of judicial reversals of adverse credibility determinations that the reviewing courts saw as inappropriately speculative and lacking in evidentiary support. Critics, including some appellate judges, have in turn alleged that the appellate courts have been insufficiently deferential to the factual determinations of Immigration Judges (IJs) and the BIA.

This paper examines the argument offered in support of limiting judicial review in this area, and provides an empirical …

Torture's Future, Aaron J. Shuler

Aaron J Shuler

No abstract provided.

"In All Things Love" Immigration, Policy-Making And The Development Of Preferential Options For The Poor, Michele R. Pistone, John J. Hoeffner

Michele R. Pistone

The invitation to write for this symposium stated that the preferential option for the poor “asks us to define what law and public policy would look like if consideration for the poor was at the heart of our conception of the common good.” Inquiries of this kind are useful and necessary—to a point. They also can become counter-productive. The issue of immigration, which we discuss here to illustrate our larger point about the general appropriateness of claiming that a specific policy prescription is demanded by the preferential option for the poor, presents the complications of the matter in particularly stark …