Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- File Type
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
Punishment For Unjust War: First International Court Decision Awarding Damages For Aggression: Will It Be Enforced?, Allen E. Shoenberger
Punishment For Unjust War: First International Court Decision Awarding Damages For Aggression: Will It Be Enforced?, Allen E. Shoenberger
Allen E Shoenberger
No abstract provided.
Punishment For Unjust War: First International Court Decision Awarding Damages For Aggression, Allen E. Shoenberger
Punishment For Unjust War: First International Court Decision Awarding Damages For Aggression, Allen E. Shoenberger
Allen E Shoenberger
The Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights Cyprus v. Turkey, both the merits decision in 2001 and the just satisfaction decision in 2014 establish important precedents in international law and stand as a caution to potential aggressor states.
Loyola Law School, State Secrets, The American Revolution, The War Of 1812: The Maritime Connections Of The Middle Temple, Allen E. Shoenberger
Loyola Law School, State Secrets, The American Revolution, The War Of 1812: The Maritime Connections Of The Middle Temple, Allen E. Shoenberger
Allen E Shoenberger
The brief article traces the connection of members of the Middle Temple to settlement of the New World, the founding of the United States, and decisions about confiscation of ships and cargoes leading to the War of 1812. Significant figures discussed include Sir Walter Raleigh, Sir Francis Drake and Sir William Scott, Head of the Admiralty Court of Britain during the Napoleonic Wars.
Connecticut Yankee Speech In Europe’S Court: Alternative Vision Of Constitutional Defamation Law To New York Times V. Sullivan?, Allen E. Shoenberger
Connecticut Yankee Speech In Europe’S Court: Alternative Vision Of Constitutional Defamation Law To New York Times V. Sullivan?, Allen E. Shoenberger
Allen E Shoenberger
The article compares and contrasts the defamation law of the European Court of Human Rights(ECHR) with that of the United States, with particular reference to NY Times v. Sullivan. The NY Times actual malice standard not only over-protects speakers, it denies a name clearing hearing to the target of defamatory speech. This is of increasing importance as new media, such as the internet, make it so easy to communicate false, defamatory statements about anyone, including in particular elected officials and candidates. President Obama was first elected to the U.S. Senate because of a sex scandal that tainted his only serious …
Connecticut Yankee Speech In Europe’S Court: Alternative Vision Of Constitutional Defamation Law To New York Times V. Sullivan?, Allen E. Shoenberger
Connecticut Yankee Speech In Europe’S Court: Alternative Vision Of Constitutional Defamation Law To New York Times V. Sullivan?, Allen E. Shoenberger
Allen E Shoenberger
The article compares and contrasts the defamation law of the European Court of Human Rights(ECHR) with that of the United States, with particular reference to NY Times v. Sullivan. The NY Times actual malice standard not only over-protects speakers, it denies a name clearing hearing to the target of defamatory speech. This is of increasing importance as new media, such as the internet, make it so easy to communicate false, defamatory statements about anyone, including in particular elected officials and candidates. President Obama was first elected to the U.S. Senate because of a sex scandal that tainted his only serious …
Thomas Paine And The Rights Of Man In European Jurisprudence: European Caselaw Confronts New York Times V. Sullivan : Different Results, Methods And Considerations: Time To Rethink Sullivan?∗, Allen E. Shoenberger
Thomas Paine And The Rights Of Man In European Jurisprudence: European Caselaw Confronts New York Times V. Sullivan : Different Results, Methods And Considerations: Time To Rethink Sullivan?∗, Allen E. Shoenberger
Allen E Shoenberger
The article compares and contrasts the defamation law of the European Court of Human Rights(ECHR) with that of the United States, with particular reference to NY Times v. Sullivan. It is suggested that american courts should themselves weigh and evalue the facts of defamation (as the NYTimes ct did); and also consider whether justification should be demanded for opinion statements, free attorney appointments for public interest defendants in defamation cases, and consideration given to a sliding scale of defamatory review for public officials who hold non-elected, lower