Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 30 of 45

Full-Text Articles in Law

Tax Treaty Treatment Of Royalty Payments From Low-Income Countries: A Comparison Of Canada And Australia’S Policies, Kim Brooks Dec 2007

Tax Treaty Treatment Of Royalty Payments From Low-Income Countries: A Comparison Of Canada And Australia’S Policies, Kim Brooks

Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press

The proposal made in this paper is a modest one: that high-income countries should further the cause of reducing global inequality by ensuring that in their tax treaties with low-income countries they do not usurp needed revenues by reducing low-income countries' ability to collect tax on income with a source in the low-income country. This argument is made in the specific context of the taxation of royalty payments, which present one of the most extreme examples of high-income countries unfairly confiscating revenues that appropriately belong to their low-income treaty partners. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) model tax …


Cep V Bell Aliant Regional Communications Llp, Innis Christie Oct 2007

Cep V Bell Aliant Regional Communications Llp, Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

This is a Union grievance regarding the scheduling of part-time employees and whether temporary student employees should be regarded as part-time for scheduling. The student's total annual work hours could be reduced under the Union's interpretation. The Employer does not include student employees as 'part-time' in the interpretation of the collective agreement.


Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw (Stone), Innis Christie Oct 2007

Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw (Stone), Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

The Grievor refused to work in what she considered an unsafe situation. After the Employer investigated she was ordered to return to work. Her refusal resulted in a two day suspension. The letter of suspension indicates that the Employer's decision was, in part, based on a similar suspension in her personal file, which is also being grieved. The Union claims the suspension was without just cause and wants the Employer to pay damages for what was lost as a result of the suspension and removal of all related documents in the personal file.


Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw (Morgan), Innis Christie Oct 2007

Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw (Morgan), Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

The Grievor was suspended with pay until a complaint by a co-worker could be investigated. The complaint dealt with a conversation regarding serial killers, which upset the co-worker and caused the Employer to be concerned about workplace safety. After the investigation the Grievor was placed on sick leave until she could provide medical proof that she was not a danger to her co-workers. The Union believes the Employer breached the collective agreement by imposing the suspension without just cause and, as remedy, wants the Employer to pay damages to compensate the Grievor for what was lost by the suspension, a …


Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw (Morgan), Innis Christie Oct 2007

Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw (Morgan), Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

The Grievor was suspended for inappropriate behaviour towards co-workers. The Union claims the three day suspension was without just, reasonable and sufficient cause and sought a remedy which would pay damages due to the suspension and removal of all related documents from the Grievor's personal file.

The grievance succeeds in part. Discipline was appropriate. There was nothing in the Grievor's personal record to support a three day suspension and one of the complaints warranted no discipline. The suspension is reduced to two days and the Grievor is to be compensated for losses resulting from the third day.


Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw (Morgan), Innis Christie Oct 2007

Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw (Morgan), Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

The Grievor was given a three day suspension (two waived, one served) for inappropriate behaviour and comments to both a co-worker and a supervisor. The Union claims the Employer breached the collective agreement by not following prescribed procedure and depending on hearsay evidence. As remedy the Union wanted the Employer to pay damages for what was lost due to the suspension and removal of all related documents from the Grievor's personal file.


Re Air Canada And Acpa (Thain), Innis Christie Sep 2007

Re Air Canada And Acpa (Thain), Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

The Grievor alleged that the Employer breached the Collective Agreement when it dismissed him after a criminal conviction. The parties requested a "bottom-line decision, without reasons".

This is a consent award. The Grievor is reinstated to employment effective immediately with a Leave of Absence status. The suspension, which occurred before the discharge, is rescinded. While on Leave of Absence the Grievor will not accrue pay or other compensation, but will retain his position on the seniority list. There will be a one year trial period. During this time a number of conditions must be addressed by the Grievor. Jurisdiction is …


Inadmissible, Eh?, Jocelyn Downie, Ronalda Murphy Sep 2007

Inadmissible, Eh?, Jocelyn Downie, Ronalda Murphy

Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press

In this commentary, we respond to Stacey Tovino's invitation to reflect further on specific legal issues she raises in relation to functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and the law (Tovino 2007). Specifically, we take up the issue of evidence law. We do this from a Canadian perspective because, unlike in the United States, this topic has not "been debated for almost 10 years" here (Tovino 2007, 44).


Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw (Paris), Innis Christie Aug 2007

Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw (Paris), Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

This is a supplementary award. The parties could not agree on the interpretation of a consent award issued the day before this grievance. The issue being the length of time the Grievor was to remain free of illegal drug use. The Union said the 24 months mentioned in the award; the Employer said indefinitely. The counsel for the Employer also suggested that the Arbitrator did not have jurisdiction to decide the matter.


Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw (Paris), Innis Christie Aug 2007

Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw (Paris), Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

The Grievor had previously been reinstated to her position, with certain conditions. This grievance was submitted by the Union after the Grievor was again discharged for a positive drug test. The parties agreed to a consent award.

This is a consent award. A "last chance" reinstatement is ordered for the Grievor with numerous conditions, which include a treatment program. Jurisdiction is retained regarding any further alleged breach, but not to modify penalty.


University Of Prince Edward Island Faculty Association V University Of Prince Edward Island, Innis Christie Jun 2007

University Of Prince Edward Island Faculty Association V University Of Prince Edward Island, Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

Member Grievance dated November 10, 2006, alleging that the Employer violated Article G1.3a) of the Collective Agreement between the parties, effective May 12, 2006 and expiring June 30, 2010, which the parties agreed is the Collective Agreement applicable here. In the Grievance the Union grieves "the Employer's violation of hiring procedures for sessional instructors", which resulted in the Grievor not being offered a sessional contract to teach [Retracted] for the Spring semester of the academic year 2006/7. The Union seeks a declaration that the Employer violated the Collective Agreement and an order that the Grievor be fully compensated for loss …


Cep V Bell Aliant Regional Communications Llp, Innis Christie Jun 2007

Cep V Bell Aliant Regional Communications Llp, Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

This is a policy grievance brought by the Union because the Employer refused to allow employees, who were accepting an early retirement package, to include outstanding vacation time as time served. The Union wanted the remedy to include a recalculation of entitlement for the relevant employees, a declaration that the Employer had violated the Agreement and an order that eligible employees be allow to reconsider their choices based on this decision. The Employer's interpretation hinged on the fact that the departure date was subject to the Employer's approval.


Re Halifax Employers Assn And Halifax Longshoremen's Assn, Local 269, Ila, Innis Christie Jun 2007

Re Halifax Employers Assn And Halifax Longshoremen's Assn, Local 269, Ila, Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

The Union believes the Employer breached the Collective Agreement by submitting the dispatch listing seeking workers twelve minutes late. The Employer believed there was a two hour range, thus the dispatch was not late and no loss was suffered by the Union members. As remedy the Union wants payment of members who might have been assigned from the 'hall' or payment into the Union trust fund.

The grievance succeeds in part. The dispatch under consideration was twelve minutes late. Thus the Employer did breach the Agreement. However, no financial loss was demonstrated and the Collective Agreement does not require a …


Pediatric Neuroimaging Ethics, Jocelyn Downie, Jennifer Marshall Mar 2007

Pediatric Neuroimaging Ethics, Jocelyn Downie, Jennifer Marshall

Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press

Neuroimaging has provided insight into numerous neurological disorders in children, such as epilepsy and cerebral palsy. Many clinicians and investigators believe that neuroimaging holds great promise, especially in the areas of behavioral and cognitive disorders. However, concerns about the risks of various neuroimaging modalities and the potential for misinterpretation of imaging results are mounting. Imaging evaluations also raise questions about stigmatization, allocation of resources, and confidentiality. Children are particularly vulnerable in this milieu and require special attention with regards to safety guidelines and modality adaptations. This article examines pediatric neuroimaging practice through an ethics lens. Most authors in the field …


Atu, Local 508 V Halifax (Regional Municipality), Innis Christie Feb 2007

Atu, Local 508 V Halifax (Regional Municipality), Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

The Grievor was terminated for inappropriate behaviour towards a female passenger. The Grievor did not believe the Employer had just cause and sought reinstatement with full wages and seniority, and the removal of all related documents from his personnel file.

The grievance succeeds in part. Given a previous disciplinary letter regarding similar behaviour, the Grievor should have known that his conduct was not acceptable. Discipline was justified, but dismissal was viewed as excessive in a situation where progressive discipline might be expected. The Grievor is reinstated with several conditions, and with one month suspension without pay. Jurisdiction is retained.


Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw (Paris), Innis Christie Feb 2007

Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw (Paris), Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

The Grievor was discharged for being absent without leave. The Union believed the Employer's action was without just, reasonable or sufficient cause. The requested remedy is full reinstatement, compensation of lost earnings and benefits, and removal of all related documents in the personnel file

The grievance succeeds in part. During the hearing the parties agreed to reinstate the Grievor, subject to a number of conditions, which are to be in effect for 24 months. Jurisdiction is retained.


Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw, Innis Christie Jan 2007

Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw, Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

The Grievor was dismissed for allegedly exposing himself and for not cooperating with the Employer's request for medical consultations. The Grievor denied the event occurred. The Union states that the dismissal was without just or sufficient cause and requests that the Grievor be fully reinstated and compensated for all lost earnings and benefits, and that all material relating to the matter be removed from his personnel file.


Promotion Of The Concept Of The Rule Of Law Through The Implementation Of The Central America Free Trade Agreement, Phillip A. Buhler Jan 2007

Promotion Of The Concept Of The Rule Of Law Through The Implementation Of The Central America Free Trade Agreement, Phillip A. Buhler

Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press

Quoting the Eighteenth Century philosopher Charles de Secondat Montesquieu, “We are free because we live under civil laws.” In the summer of 2006 lawyers and businessmen in the Dominican Republic, the United States and most of Central America experienced full implementation of the Dominican Republic – Central America Free Trade Agreement (hereinafter CAFTA). This regional trade agreement, following on the general model of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the parameters of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), is intended to establish a comprehensive legal regime to reduce and eventually eliminate most national barriers to the …


Guiding Patrons To Online Health Information: Can Librarians Be Found Liable?, Elaine Gibson Jan 2007

Guiding Patrons To Online Health Information: Can Librarians Be Found Liable?, Elaine Gibson

Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press

The amount of health information available on the Internet is growing rapidly and information intermediaries are increasingly being asked to help information seekers find and make sense of this information. This activity is for the most part benign from a legal perspective. However, there is a small possibility that, should the intermediary steer an information seeker to information that proves harmful to the seeker, the intermediary may be found liable for injuries incurred. In this paper, we examine the theoretical underpinnings of the relevant laws, clarify the risks, and recommend ways to minimize risk.


Respecting Adolescents' Confidentiality And Reproductive And Sexual Choices, Rebecca Cook, Joanna Erdman, Bernard Dickens Jan 2007

Respecting Adolescents' Confidentiality And Reproductive And Sexual Choices, Rebecca Cook, Joanna Erdman, Bernard Dickens

Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press

Adolescents, defined as between 10 and 19 years old, present a growing challenge to reproductive health. Adolescent sexual intercourse contributes to worldwide burdens of unplanned pregnancy, abortion, spread of sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including HIV, and maternal mortality and morbidity. A barrier to contraceptive care and termination of adolescent pregnancy is the belief that in law minors intellectually mature enough to give consent also require consent of, or at least prior information to, their parental guardians. Adolescents may avoid parental disclosure by forgoing desirable reproductive health care. Recent judicial decisions, however, give effect to internationally established human rights to confidentiality, …


Family As Status In Doe V Canada: Constituting Family Under Section 15 Of The Charter, Elaine Craig Jan 2007

Family As Status In Doe V Canada: Constituting Family Under Section 15 Of The Charter, Elaine Craig

Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press

The Ontario Court of Appeal recently released a decision rejecting a constitutional challenge to the Processing and Distribution of Semen for Assisted Conception Regulations. In this paper I argue that the Court's reasoning in Doe v. Canada is flawed and that certain provisions of the Semen Regulations constitute an unjustified infringement of section 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. I also argue that the claimants in this case would have been better served by the jurisprudence of section 15 of the Charter had they premised their argument on the assertion that they were discriminated against on the …


Global Reach, Local Grasp: Constructing Extraterritorial Jurisdiction In The Age Of Globalization, Steve Coughlan, Robert Currie, Hugh Kindred, Teresa Scassa Jan 2007

Global Reach, Local Grasp: Constructing Extraterritorial Jurisdiction In The Age Of Globalization, Steve Coughlan, Robert Currie, Hugh Kindred, Teresa Scassa

Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press

The reach of national law is often greater than its grasp. Canada, like other countries, has effective legal power over its territory and all within it. However, one consequence of the current process of globalization, for good or ill, is that Canadian interests are no longer contained exclusively within Canadian borders. Canada thus finds it increasingly necessary to consider asserting its legal jurisdiction beyond its frontiers. Such extraterritorial assertion of Canadian authority may well run into strong opposition from other countries, who might view Canada as attempting to intervene in their own national territory and domestic affairs. Likewise, other states, …


Canada-Usa Bilateral Fisheries Management In The Gulf Of Maine: Under The Radar Screen, David Vanderzwaag, Emily J. Pudden Jan 2007

Canada-Usa Bilateral Fisheries Management In The Gulf Of Maine: Under The Radar Screen, David Vanderzwaag, Emily J. Pudden

Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press

Canada and the USA have developed a series of cooperative initiatives that address transboundary fisheries issues in the Gulf of Maine. The Canada – USA Steering Committee serves as an umbrella forum for discussing and coordinating transboundary management measures. Through the work of the Transboundary Resource Assessment Committee and the Transboundary Management Guidance Committee, the Steering Committee has overseen the development of joint scientific stock assessments and a sharing agreement for groundfish resources in the vicinity of the eastern Georges Bank. The bilateral Fisheries Enforcement Agreement helps ensure the success of such cooperative management initiatives by combating illegal fishing in …


Preventing Salmon Escapes From Aquaculture In Canada And The Usa: Limited International Coordinates, Divergent Regulatory Currents And Possible Future Courses, David Vanderzwaag, Tricia Barry Jan 2007

Preventing Salmon Escapes From Aquaculture In Canada And The Usa: Limited International Coordinates, Divergent Regulatory Currents And Possible Future Courses, David Vanderzwaag, Tricia Barry

Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press

Following an introductory review of the continuing problem of salmon escaping from aquaculture operations along the Atlantic and Pacific coasts of North America, and the considerable uncertainties over ecological impacts, this article examines the law and policy context for preventing escapes from three perspectives. First, the limited guidance for addressing aquaculture escapes under existing global and regional agreements/arrangements is highlighted. Second, how Canada and the USA have sought to control escape events at national and provincial/State levels is summarized. Third, possible future courses are identified, which improve the way salmon escapes are addressed, with stronger regional responses suggested as most …


High Seas Fisheries: Troubled Waters, Tangled Governance And Recovery Prospects, David Vanderzwaag, Boris Worm Jan 2007

High Seas Fisheries: Troubled Waters, Tangled Governance And Recovery Prospects, David Vanderzwaag, Boris Worm

Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press

Global fisheries are in a perceived state of crisis. Despite growing technological effort and an unprecedented global expansion of fisheries, total landings (85-100 million MT per year) have stagnated and probably entered a period of slow decline. This trend may destabilize ocean ecosystems and undermine world seafood supplies, which provide the major source of protein for 2.3bn people, and international cooperation to address this issue has been slow. This is particularly true for highseas fisheries that occur in international waters encompassing some 61% of the world's ocean. These have been plagued by a fragmented and weak legal framework, poor enforcement …


Promotion Of The Concept Of The Rule Of Law Through The Implementation Of The Central America Free Trade Agreement, Phillip A. Buhler Jan 2007

Promotion Of The Concept Of The Rule Of Law Through The Implementation Of The Central America Free Trade Agreement, Phillip A. Buhler

Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press

Quoting the Eighteenth Century philosopher Charles de Secondat Montesquieu, “We are free because we live under civil laws.”

In the summer of 2006 lawyers and businessmen in the Dominican Republic, the United States and most of Central America experienced full implementation of the Dominican Republic – Central America Free Trade Agreement (hereinafter CAFTA). This regional trade agreement, following on the general model of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the parameters of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), is intended to establish a comprehensive legal regime to reduce and eventually eliminate most national barriers to the …


Invasive Seaweed: Global And Regional Law And Policy Responses, Meinhard Doelle, Moira Mcconnell, David Vanderzwaag Jan 2007

Invasive Seaweed: Global And Regional Law And Policy Responses, Meinhard Doelle, Moira Mcconnell, David Vanderzwaag

Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press

We consider law and policy responses to invasive seaweeds at global and regional levels. Key global regimes considered include the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, the Convention on Biological Diversity, the Ramsar Convention and the Bonn Convention on Migratory Species. Contributions from the Food and Agriculture Organization and the International Maritime Organization are also considered in the global context. At a regional level, examples of efforts in North America and Europe are offered to illustrate challenges and opportunities for regional responses to invasive seaweeds. We conclude with law and policy recommendations, most notably the need …


Achieving Transparency In Implementing Abortion Laws, Rebecca Cook, Joanna Erdman, Bernard Dickens Jan 2007

Achieving Transparency In Implementing Abortion Laws, Rebecca Cook, Joanna Erdman, Bernard Dickens

Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press

National and international courts and tribunals are increasingly ruling that although states may aim to deter unlawful abortion by criminal penalties, they bear a parallel duty to inform physicians and patients of when abortion is lawful. The fear is that women are unjustly denied safe medical procedures to which they are legally entitled, because without such information physicians are deterred from involvement. With particular attention to the European Court of Human Rights, the UN Human Rights Committee, the Constitutional Court of Colombia, the Northern Ireland Court of Appeal, and the US Supreme Court, decisions are explained that show the responsibility …


Extraterritorial Criminal Jurisdiction: Bigger Picture Or Smaller Frame?, Robert Currie, Steve Coughlan Jan 2007

Extraterritorial Criminal Jurisdiction: Bigger Picture Or Smaller Frame?, Robert Currie, Steve Coughlan

Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press

The authors review extensively Canadian law and practice on the exercise of extraterritorial criminal jurisdiction, and the extent to which that may have changed in recent years. They conclude that, while there are now many more instances of Canada asserting extraterritorial jurisdiction, any change in policy is more apparent than real. What has changed is how often the situations that prompt extraterritorial jurisdiction arise, particularly in that there are now many international treaties requiring Canada to exercise jurisdiction in this way. The authors also argue that this policy of cautious expansion and constructive engagement with international practice is desirable and …


Abducted Fugitives Before The International Criminal Court: Problems And Prospects, Robert Currie Jan 2007

Abducted Fugitives Before The International Criminal Court: Problems And Prospects, Robert Currie

Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press

In the law and literature relating to the exertion of criminal jurisdiction over the person, there exists a nagging problem that has plagued practitioners, courts and academics alike. The phrase of art is usually something along the lines of "irregular rendition," but the issues are as notorious as they are controversial: what should a court do with an accused criminal brought before it as a result of abduction (or otherwise illegal detention) from a foreign state? And, in particular, should the fact of the illegal or irregular rendition of the fugitive affect either the court's ability or its willingness to …