Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- ABA law practice division (1)
- Absorption (1)
- Antitrust (1)
- Antitrust law (1)
- Antitrust reform (1)
-
- Antitrust regulation (1)
- Attentive listeners (1)
- Attorney well-being (1)
- Autonomy (1)
- Baseball (1)
- Billable hour requirements (1)
- Boosters (1)
- Build mutual trust (1)
- Business of law (1)
- Careers (1)
- Case law (1)
- Choice of law (1)
- Client-lawyer relationship (1)
- Command and control (1)
- Competence (1)
- Confidence (1)
- Conflict of law (1)
- Connection (1)
- Constructive criticism (1)
- Contextual boosters (1)
- Corporate law (1)
- Corporations (1)
- Curt flood act (1)
- Decision-making (1)
- Dedication (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Lessons From Psychology For Law Practice Management, Peter G. Glenn
Lessons From Psychology For Law Practice Management, Peter G. Glenn
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
No abstract provided.
Lessons From Psychology For Law Practice Management, Peter Glenn
Lessons From Psychology For Law Practice Management, Peter Glenn
Faculty Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Choice Of Law And The Preponderantly Multistate Rule: The Example Of Successor Corporation Products Liability, Diana Sclar
Choice Of Law And The Preponderantly Multistate Rule: The Example Of Successor Corporation Products Liability, Diana Sclar
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
Most state rules of substantive law, whether legislative or judicial, ordinarily adjust rights and obligations among local parties with respect to local events. Conventional choice of law methodologies for adjudicating disputes with multistate connections all start from an explicit or implicit assumption of a choice between such locally oriented substantive rules. This article reveals, for the first time, that some state rules of substantive law ordinarily adjust rights and obligations with respect to parties and events connected to more than one state and only occasionally apply to wholly local matters. For these rules I use the term “nominally domestic rules …
Antitrust Changeup: How A Single Antitrust Reform Could Be A Home Run For Minor League Baseball Players, Jeremy Ulm
Antitrust Changeup: How A Single Antitrust Reform Could Be A Home Run For Minor League Baseball Players, Jeremy Ulm
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
In 1890, Congress passed the Sherman Antitrust Act to protect competition in the marketplace. Federal antitrust law has developed to prevent businesses from exerting unfair power on their employees and customers. Specifically, the Sherman Act prevents competitors from reaching unreasonable agreements amongst themselves and from monopolizing markets. However, not all industries have these protections.
Historically, federal antitrust law has not governed the “Business of Baseball.” The Supreme Court had the opportunity to apply antitrust law to baseball in Federal Baseball Club, Incorporated v. National League of Professional Baseball Clubs; however, the Court held that the Business of Baseball was not …