Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 2 of 2

Full-Text Articles in Law

Case Note: Procuring A Different Cause: The Return Of The Procuring Cause Doctrine As Applied To Minnesota Real Estate Commission Disputes In Rosenberg V. Heritage Renovations, Llc, Robert Schug Jan 2005

Case Note: Procuring A Different Cause: The Return Of The Procuring Cause Doctrine As Applied To Minnesota Real Estate Commission Disputes In Rosenberg V. Heritage Renovations, Llc, Robert Schug

William Mitchell Law Review

This note first examines some useful history and terminology regarding real estate commission disputes, the procuring cause doctrine, and Minnesota Statutes section 82.21.4 It follows with a summary of the facts of the Rosenberg decision and the Minnesota Court of Appeals’ and Minnesota Supreme Court’s analysis of the case. This note then analyzes the supreme court’s decision to apply the procuring cause doctrine in Rosenberg, and concludes with a plea to the Minnesota legislature to clarify that the effect of the statute is to abrogate that doctrine.


Defective Products And Product Warranty Claims In Minnesota, J. David Prince Jan 2005

Defective Products And Product Warranty Claims In Minnesota, J. David Prince

William Mitchell Law Review

Warranty law is an important supplement to tort law principles governing liability for defective products. Warranties arise from promises or assertions associated with either the sale of a product or some other transfer of a product for value. Such promises or assertions about a product may be express, made in the form of the seller’s statements about the qualities or attributes of the product, or they may simply be implied as a matter of policy. Although warranty law is generally regarded today as part of the body of contract law, the origins of warranty lie in tort. Important developments in …