Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- National security (56)
- Executive power (21)
- Qaida (Organization) (14)
- Counterterrorism (11)
- Detention of persons (11)
-
- September 11 Terrorist Attacks 2001 (11)
- Terrorism--United States (11)
- Intelligence service (9)
- Targeted killing (9)
- Geneva Conventions (1949) (8)
- National Security (8)
- Civil rights (7)
- Secret police (7)
- United States. Dept. of Justice. Office of Legal Counsel (7)
- War on Terrorism 2001-2009 -- Political aspects (7)
- Drone warfare (6)
- Habeas corpus (6)
- Lawyers--Malpractice (6)
- Police questioning (6)
- Terrorists (6)
- Combatants & noncombatants (International law) (5)
- Military (5)
- Military courts (5)
- War on Terrorism 2001-2009 -- Political aspects; National security (5)
- Japanese Americans (4)
- Right of privacy (4)
- Torture (4)
- War on Terrorism 2001-2009 (4)
- Drug courts (3)
- Due process (3)
- Publication Year
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 110
Full-Text Articles in Law
Uncle Sam Wants You, Unless You’Re Trans: How Greene V. Mcelroy Allows Discrimination In The Military, Amy Vedder
Uncle Sam Wants You, Unless You’Re Trans: How Greene V. Mcelroy Allows Discrimination In The Military, Amy Vedder
Mitchell Hamline Law Journal of Public Policy and Practice
No abstract provided.
The Missouri Birth Certificate Statute: How It Strips Transgender Service Members Of Fundamental Rights And Hinders Their Ability To Serve Openly In The U.S. Military, Taylor Blevins
Mitchell Hamline Law Review
No abstract provided.
From Healthcare To Hiring: Impacts Of Social And Public Policy On Disabled Veterans In The United States, Benjamin Michael Stoflet
From Healthcare To Hiring: Impacts Of Social And Public Policy On Disabled Veterans In The United States, Benjamin Michael Stoflet
Student Scholarship
The United States Government is struggling to fulfill commitments it has made to service members suffering from disabilities incurred during honorable service to the country. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) disability compensation structure, job training programs, and methods of alternative dispute resolution is a patchwork resulting from decades of legislation creating a system where veterans often become locked in a complicated and often combative process to obtain benefits they have earned. Employers, advocacy groups, academics, and federal officials agree that there are systematic issues within the VA negatively impacting disabled veterans. These include a lack of patient-centered care, divergent …
Gamble V. United States: Military Justice In Absence Of Double Jeopardy, Kelsi B. White
Gamble V. United States: Military Justice In Absence Of Double Jeopardy, Kelsi B. White
Mitchell Hamline Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Canary In The Military Justice Mineshaft: A Review Of Recent Sexual Assault Courts-Martial Tainted By Unlawful Command Influence, Mark Visger
Mitchell Hamline Law Journal of Public Policy and Practice
No abstract provided.
Implications Of The Ban On Open Service By Transgender Individuals In The United States Military, Louie Swanson
Implications Of The Ban On Open Service By Transgender Individuals In The United States Military, Louie Swanson
Mitchell Hamline Law Journal of Public Policy and Practice
No abstract provided.
Combating For-Profit Education’S Use Of Erroneous, Deceptive,And Misleading Practices Against Veterans And The Gi Bill, Luke R. Nelson
Combating For-Profit Education’S Use Of Erroneous, Deceptive,And Misleading Practices Against Veterans And The Gi Bill, Luke R. Nelson
Mitchell Hamline Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Practitioner’S Guide To Due Process Issues In Veteranstreatment Courts, Evan C. Tsai
The Practitioner’S Guide To Due Process Issues In Veteranstreatment Courts, Evan C. Tsai
Mitchell Hamline Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Minnesota Stand Down Model: Bringing Stand Down Courtsto Rural Communities, Sara Sommarstrom
The Minnesota Stand Down Model: Bringing Stand Down Courtsto Rural Communities, Sara Sommarstrom
Mitchell Hamline Law Review
No abstract provided.
Reasonable Interpretation, Unreasonable Results? Howmandated Government Set-Asides For Veteran-Ownedbusinesses Is A Win-Loss Proposition—Kingdomwaretechnologies, Inc. V. United States, Benjamin M. Kline
Mitchell Hamline Law Review
No abstract provided.
Legal Strategies For Defending The Combat Veteran In Criminalcourt, Brockton D. Hunter, Ryan Christian Else
Legal Strategies For Defending The Combat Veteran In Criminalcourt, Brockton D. Hunter, Ryan Christian Else
Mitchell Hamline Law Review
No abstract provided.
Assessing Soldiers' Mental Health: Meeting The Needs Of Veterans With Ptsd, Tbi, And Cte—Pre-Deployment, At Home, And In Court, Robert H. Ambrose
Assessing Soldiers' Mental Health: Meeting The Needs Of Veterans With Ptsd, Tbi, And Cte—Pre-Deployment, At Home, And In Court, Robert H. Ambrose
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Paradoxes Of Restitution, Mark A. Edwards
The Paradoxes Of Restitution, Mark A. Edwards
Faculty Scholarship
Restitution following mass dispossession is often considered both ideal and impossible. Why? This article identifies two previously unnamed paradoxes that undermine the possibility of restitution.
First, both dispossession and restitution depend on the social construction of rights-worthiness. Over time, people once considered unworthy of property rights ‘become’ worthy of them. However, time also corrodes the practicality and moral weight of restitution claims. By the time the dispossessed ‘become’ worthy of property rights, restitution claims are no longer practically or morally viable. This is the time-unworthiness paradox.
Second, restitution claims are undermined by the concept of collective responsibility. People are sometimes …
Notice And An Opportunity To Be Heard Before The President Kills You, Richard Murphy, Afsheen John Radsan
Notice And An Opportunity To Be Heard Before The President Kills You, Richard Murphy, Afsheen John Radsan
Faculty Scholarship
The United States identifies particular people as especially dangerous members of al Qaeda, the Taliban, or associated forces, and then kills them. Critics insist that this targeted killing is illegal; some go so far as to call it assassination. The drone strike that killed Anwar al-Awlaki, an American citizen, generated furious criticism for purportedly violating his due process rights.
In spring 2013, President Obama responded in a wide-ranging speech on national security policy. On the topic of drones, he stated that terrorists are targeted only if they constitute “a continuing and imminent threat to the American people.” He announced that …
Responses To The Five Questions, Steven Metz
Responses To The Five Questions, Steven Metz
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To The Five Questions, A. Mark Weisburd
Responses To The Five Questions, A. Mark Weisburd
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To The Five Questions, Jody M. Prescott
Responses To The Five Questions, Jody M. Prescott
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To The Five Questions, Charles J. Dunlop Jr.
Responses To The Five Questions, Charles J. Dunlop Jr.
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judicial Formalism And The State Secrets Privilege, Sudha Setty
Judicial Formalism And The State Secrets Privilege, Sudha Setty
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Targeted Strikes: The Consequences Of Blurring The Armed Conflict And Self-Defense Justifications, Laurie R. Blank
Targeted Strikes: The Consequences Of Blurring The Armed Conflict And Self-Defense Justifications, Laurie R. Blank
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Uneasy Neighbors: Comparative American And Canadian Counter-Terrorism, Kent Roach
Uneasy Neighbors: Comparative American And Canadian Counter-Terrorism, Kent Roach
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To The Five Questions, John Hursh
Responses To The Five Questions, John Hursh
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To The Five Questions, Norman Abrams
Responses To The Five Questions, Norman Abrams
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To The Five Questions, Harvey Rishikof, Bernard Horowitz
Responses To The Five Questions, Harvey Rishikof, Bernard Horowitz
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Secrecy, Transparency, And National Security, Lawrence Friedman, Victor Hansen
Secrecy, Transparency, And National Security, Lawrence Friedman, Victor Hansen
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To The Ten Questions, Shane Harris
Responses To The Ten Questions, Shane Harris
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To The Ten Questions, James M. Rosenbaum
Responses To The Ten Questions, James M. Rosenbaum
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To The Ten Questions, Tung Yin
Responses To The Ten Questions, Tung Yin
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To The Ten Questions, Aziz Rana
Responses To The Ten Questions, Aziz Rana
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Responses To The Ten Questions, Robert D. Sloane
Responses To The Ten Questions, Robert D. Sloane
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.