Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Civil litigation (2)
- Civil procedure (2)
- ADR (1)
- At Home Rule (1)
- Civil Procedure (1)
-
- Covid (1)
- Covid 19 (1)
- Dispute resolution (1)
- Duties (1)
- Election (1)
- Ethics (1)
- Eviction (1)
- Federal rules of civil procedure (1)
- General Jurisdiction (1)
- Health care (1)
- Housing (1)
- Information duty (1)
- Informed consent (1)
- Intellectual property (1)
- Intellectual property legal writing (1)
- Judicial (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Landlord/tenant (1)
- Legal storytelling (1)
- Legal writing (1)
- Non-attorney representation (1)
- Patent (1)
- Patent Act (1)
- Patent bargain (1)
- Patent protection (1)
Articles 1 - 8 of 8
Full-Text Articles in Law
Inviting The People Into People's Court: Embracing Non-Attorney Representation In Eviction Proceedings, Gregory Zlotnick
Inviting The People Into People's Court: Embracing Non-Attorney Representation In Eviction Proceedings, Gregory Zlotnick
Marquette Benefits and Social Welfare Law Review
Evictions often hide in plain sight—and so does one of the most effective responses. Studies uniformly confirm that represented tenants avoid evictions, and with it associated downstream effects, at appreciably higher rates than unrepresented tenants. Tenant representation is one of the most cost-effective anti-poverty interventions available in our housing system. Lawyers should support its expansion, even if and when it a non-lawyer serves as that intervenor in eviction court.
This paper argues that the legal profession should embrace and expand existing pathways for training eligible and interested individuals, regardless of whether they are licensed attorneys, to assist tenants facing eviction. …
Presuit Lawyer Information Duties Relevant To Civil Litigation, Jeffrey A. Parness
Presuit Lawyer Information Duties Relevant To Civil Litigation, Jeffrey A. Parness
Marquette Law Review
In both federal and state courts in the United States, there are significant civil procedure, professional responsibility, and substantive laws addressing presuit lawyer duties on creating, preserving, producing, and protecting information relevant to later civil litigation. These laws speak to lawyer conduct both in personally handling information and in overseeing the information acts of others. To date, the challenges these laws pose to lawyers have not been well examined, or even largely perceived. And, to date, lawyers have been left unaccountable for their personal violations of these duties.
A Survey Of Civil Procedure: Technology To Covid-19 Within State Courts, Joshua H. Hernandez
A Survey Of Civil Procedure: Technology To Covid-19 Within State Courts, Joshua H. Hernandez
Marquette Law Review
The COVID-19 pandemic catalyzed the implementation of technological innovation within the legal field. Specifically, state courts used technology to adjust their civil procedures while maintaining accurate results, limiting costs, and providing meaningful participation to varying degrees of success. In addition, given the piecemeal nature of these adjustments, there is a lack of knowledge regarding what actions were taken in the early months of the pandemic. Thus, this Comment conducts a survey focusing on how the states adjusted their judicial civil procedures to respond to COVID-19’s impact. This Comment then argues that the most liberal implementation of technological adjustments may not …
The Past And The Present: Stare Decisis In Wisconsin Law, Daniel R. Suhr, Kevin Leroy
The Past And The Present: Stare Decisis In Wisconsin Law, Daniel R. Suhr, Kevin Leroy
Marquette Law Review
None
... Because "Yes" Actually Means "No": A Personalized Prescriptive To Reactualize Informed Consent In Dispute Resolution
Marquette Law Review
None.
Private Or Public Right? Who Should Adjudicate Patentability Disputes And Is The Current Scheme Really Constitutional?, Jasmyne M. Baynard
Private Or Public Right? Who Should Adjudicate Patentability Disputes And Is The Current Scheme Really Constitutional?, Jasmyne M. Baynard
Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review
“The patent bargain is the foundation upon which the patent system is built: in exchange for protections for an invention, the inventor agrees to make public their inventions so that others may build upon it.” The patent bargain creates a presumption of protection for the inventors, yet categorizing the patent a public right or a private right has diminished expectations for inventors and confusion for the masses. On October 11, 2016, the Supreme Court denied two petitions for writ of certiorari that challenged the constitutionality of Patent Trial and Review Board proceedings on the basis of the patent owner’s Seventh …
What's Your Story? Every Famous Mark Has One: Persuasion In Trademark Opposition Briefs, Candace Hays
What's Your Story? Every Famous Mark Has One: Persuasion In Trademark Opposition Briefs, Candace Hays
Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review
A key contention of legal writing scholarship is that the legal resolution is rooted in storytelling. The law consists of an endless telling and retelling of stories. Clients tell stories to their lawyers, who must figure out how to frame their client’s narrative into a legal context. Lawyers retell their clients’ stories to judges using pleadings, motions, and legal briefs. Judges and administrators retell these stories in the form of an opinion or verdict.
Storytelling in the legal context is an important element of persuasion. For the purpose of this comment, legal storytelling is defined as the use of fiction-writing …
The Necessary Narrowing Of General Personal Jurisdiction, William Grayson Lambert
The Necessary Narrowing Of General Personal Jurisdiction, William Grayson Lambert
Marquette Law Review
General personal jurisdiction allows a court to issue a binding judgment against a defendant in any case, even if the facts giving rise to the case are unrelated to that forum. In the six decades after International Shoe v. Washington, courts held that general jurisdiction existed whenever a defendant had substantial continuous and systemic contacts with the forum. This rule was narrowed significantly in 2011, however, when the Supreme Court in Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown held that general jurisdiction was properly exercised only when a defendant had sufficient contacts to be “at home” in the forum.