Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
Gonzales V. Industrial Acci. Com. [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Gonzales V. Industrial Acci. Com. [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
It was not error to rate a claimant's pre-existing deaf-muteness at half of the standard ratings for deafness and muteness caused by an industrial accident because the claimant had worked for many years with his condition.
. Chavez V. Industrial Accident Com. [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
. Chavez V. Industrial Accident Com. [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
The surviving spouse and the children were properly granted benefits consisting principally of unpaid compensation payments that accrued prior to the employee's death. The commission's disapproval of compromise was proper.
Sutton V. Industrial Acci. Com., Jesse W. Carter
Sutton V. Industrial Acci. Com., Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
An industrial accident commission should not have ordered that an employee's permanent disability be reduced after the statutory five-year period had expired, even though application for the reduction was made prior to expiration.
Sprague V. Industrial Acci. Com. [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Sprague V. Industrial Acci. Com. [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
An industrial accident commission properly dismissed petitioner's request for an increased disability rating because petitioner made her request more than six years after the date of her injury, and the commission did not have jurisdiction over it.
Reinert V. Industrial Acci. Com., Jesse W. Carter
Reinert V. Industrial Acci. Com., Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
An employee seriously injured during a recreational activity that was considered part of her remuneration was entitled to compensation for personal injuries. The injuries occurred during an activity permitted and encouraged by the employer.
Madin V. Industrial Acci. Com., Jesse W. Carter
Madin V. Industrial Acci. Com., Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Employees employed as 24 hour a day caretakers of employer's rental property were injured in the course of employment and entitled to workers' compensation when a bulldozer from an adjacent property went wild and ran into their unit, injuring them.