Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Golden Gate University School of Law

Jesse Carter Opinions

Securities Law

Articles 1 - 4 of 4

Full-Text Articles in Law

Walnut Creek V. Silveira, Jesse W. Carter Feb 1957

Walnut Creek V. Silveira, Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

Limited Obligation Bond Law was a valid general law because it related to a municipal affair by providing new streets to provide for the greatly increased traffic circulation in commercial area and general fund was not liable for payment of bonds.


Melancon V. Superior Court Of Los Angeles County [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter Apr 1954

Melancon V. Superior Court Of Los Angeles County [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

Shareholder was not entitled to writ of mandate ordering trial court to allow depositions in shareholders' derivative suit, as such action constituted prosecution of an action, and shareholder was required to give security before proceeding.


Beyerbach V. Juno Oil Co. [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter Jan 1954

Beyerbach V. Juno Oil Co. [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

Court affirmed dismissal of stockholder's derivative action for failure to furnish security finding that under California corporation law the trial court had the authority to fix the nature and amount of the security.


Hogan V. Ingold [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter Apr 1952

Hogan V. Ingold [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter

Jesse Carter Opinions

A statutory requirement that a stockholder post security for expenses in a derivative suit filed after the statute's effective date was prospective and procedural, even though the alleged corporate wrongs occurred before the statute's enactment.