Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
Articles 1 - 9 of 9
Full-Text Articles in Law
Volf V. Ocean Acci. & Guarantee Corp. [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Volf V. Ocean Acci. & Guarantee Corp. [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Insureds were not entitled to damages for cost of replacing defective stucco where they sought coverage excluded in policy; defective stucco in house they constructed and sold was property in their care, custody, or control.
Industrial Indem. Co. V. Golden State Co. [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Industrial Indem. Co. V. Golden State Co. [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
The judgment declaring a transfer agreement void in favor of the rigging company was proper because the district court's findings were supported by substantial evidence and the denial of interest on the award was properly within its discretion.
Wildman V. Government Employees' Ins. Co., Jesse W. Carter
Wildman V. Government Employees' Ins. Co., Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Restrictive endorsement in motor vehicle insurance policy, which purported to preclude coverage when a third party drove the vehicle with the insured's permission, was ambiguous and was also violative of the California Vehicle Code.
Vyn V. Northwest Casualty Co., Jesse W. Carter
Vyn V. Northwest Casualty Co., Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
An insurer was not liable to cover an accident under a policy it had issued to the insured when the insured had not ordered the policy, returned the policy to the insurer, and did not pay premiums on the policy until after the accident had occurred.
Beneficial Fire & Casualty Ins. Co. V. Kurt Hitke & Co., Jesse W. Carter
Beneficial Fire & Casualty Ins. Co. V. Kurt Hitke & Co., Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
The trial court's declaration in insurance company's favor regarding its rights under a written agency contract was improper where contract was ambiguous and extrinsic evidence should have been admitted to aid in construing the contract.
Continental Casualty Co. V. Phoenix Constr. Co. [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Continental Casualty Co. V. Phoenix Constr. Co. [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
A tortfeasor worked for a trucking company in a joint venture, and the company's insurance carrier, was primarily liable to the victim. Because the trucking company's coverage was sufficient, it was unnecessary to look elsewhere for payment.
Zuckerman V. Underwriters At Lloyd's, London [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Zuckerman V. Underwriters At Lloyd's, London [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Jury verdict against beneficiaries under an accidental life insurance policy was affirmed on appeal because there was no reversible error in the trial court's instructions to the jury.
California-Western States Life Ins. Co. V. Industrial Acci. Com. [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
California-Western States Life Ins. Co. V. Industrial Acci. Com. [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
Where the California Compensation Insurance Fund erroneously paid a claimant's compensation award after notice that an employer's unemployment disability insurance carrier claimed a lien, the state insurance fund was liable to the carrier.
New York Life Ins. Co. V. Hollender [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
New York Life Ins. Co. V. Hollender [Dissent], Jesse W. Carter
Jesse Carter Opinions
A judgment in favor of defendant in an action to reform an insurance policy issued on the life of defendant was reversed because the amount payable should have been the sum which premiums paid would have purchased at defendant's correct age.