Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Fordham Law School

Fordham Law Review

Interpretation

Articles 1 - 30 of 42

Full-Text Articles in Law

Outsourcing The Law: History And The Disciplinary Limits Of Constitutional Reasoning, Helen Irving Dec 2015

Outsourcing The Law: History And The Disciplinary Limits Of Constitutional Reasoning, Helen Irving

Fordham Law Review

Debates about the use of history in constitutional interpretation find their primary nourishment in the originalism debate. This has generated a vast amount of literature, but also narrowed the terms of the debate. Originalism is a normative commitment wrapped in a questionable methodological confidence. Regardless of the multiple forms originalism takes, originalists are confident that the meaning (in the sense of intention) that animated the framing of the Constitution can be ascertained and, indeed, that they can ascertain it. The debate has largely focused, then, on whether modern-day scholars and jurists can ascertain original historical meaning or, alternatively, whether they …


Tone Deaf To The Past: More Qualms About Public Meaning Originalism, Jack Rakove Dec 2015

Tone Deaf To The Past: More Qualms About Public Meaning Originalism, Jack Rakove

Fordham Law Review

With some apologies for a vast degree of oversimplification, let us stipulate that there are two main forms of originalism. One is known as “semantic” or “public meaning” originalism. Its leading advocates include Lawrence Solum, Keith Whittington, and Randy Barnett (professional friends, all). The leading premise of semantic originalism is that the meaning of the constitutional text—or, more specifically, of its individual clauses—was fixed at the moment of its adoption. Under this view, the goal of constitutional interpretation is to recover that original meaning, and the best way to do that pivots on reconstructing how an informed reader, whether a …


Historicism And Holism: Failures Of Originalist Translation, Jonathan Gienapp Dec 2015

Historicism And Holism: Failures Of Originalist Translation, Jonathan Gienapp

Fordham Law Review

For as long as the U.S. Constitution has existed, Americans have appealed to the history of its creation to interpret its meaning. But only since the advent of originalism—the well-known constitutional theory that requires interpreting the Constitution today in accordance with its original meaning—has historical study been so immediately implicated by constitutional interpretation. Despite potential, though, for meaningful exchange between originalists and historians, little has taken place. That originalism plays an ever-growing role in contemporary political culture only makes the lack of dialogue all the more unfortunate.


Historians And The New Originalism: Contextualism, Historicism, And Constitutional Meaning, Martin S. Flaherty Dec 2015

Historians And The New Originalism: Contextualism, Historicism, And Constitutional Meaning, Martin S. Flaherty

Fordham Law Review

Toward that end, this Foreword addresses three matters. First, it considers why the use of history in constitutional interpretation is inescapable. Next, it suggests that the Essays in this forum do not go far enough in debunking the idea of “public meaning” originalism as a serious alternative to previous approaches. Finally, the balance of this Foreword reviews the also perhaps inescapable misuses of history that constitutional interpretation invites and considers the type of misuse that public meaning originalism represents.


“To Assemble Together For Their Common Good”: History, Ethnography, And The Original Meanings Of The Rights Of Assembly And Speech, Saul Cornell Dec 2015

“To Assemble Together For Their Common Good”: History, Ethnography, And The Original Meanings Of The Rights Of Assembly And Speech, Saul Cornell

Fordham Law Review

The Whiskey Rebellion is not generally a major focus in constitutional histories or casebooks. Given this fact, it is hardly surprising that the 1795 case Respublica v. Montgomery seldom figures as more than a minor footnote in scholarly writing about early American constitutional development, if it receives any attention at all. The case has little precedential value for modern First Amendment doctrine and only obliquely implicates larger jurisprudential questions about the rights of assembly and freedom of expression. In strictly doctrinal terms, Montgomery is primarily about the obligation of a justice of the peace to put down a riot, not …


The Arduous Virtue Of Fidelity: Originalism, Scalia, Tribe, And Nerve, Ronald Dworkin Apr 2015

The Arduous Virtue Of Fidelity: Originalism, Scalia, Tribe, And Nerve, Ronald Dworkin

Fordham Law Review

Proper constitutional interpretation takes both text and past practice as its object: Lawyers and judges faced with a contemporary constitutional issue must try to construct a coherent, principled, and persuasive interpretation of the text of particular clauses, the structure of the Constitution as a whole, and our history under the Constitution—an interpretation that both unifies these distinct sources, so far as this is possible, and directs future adjudication. They must seek, that is, constitutional integrity. So fidelity to the Constitution's text does not exhaust constitutional interpretation, and on some occasions overall constitutional integrity might require a result that could …


Second-Order Perfectionism, Cass R. Sunstein Jan 2007

Second-Order Perfectionism, Cass R. Sunstein

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Fit Dimension, Abner S. Greene Jan 2007

The Fit Dimension, Abner S. Greene

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.


Privacy, Minimalism, And Perfectionism, Charles A. Kelbley Jan 2007

Privacy, Minimalism, And Perfectionism, Charles A. Kelbley

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.


Valuing Autonomy, Youngjae Lee Jan 2007

Valuing Autonomy, Youngjae Lee

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.


Minimalism, Perfectionism, And Common Law Constitutionalism: Reflections On Sunstein's And Fleming's Efforts To Find The Sweet Spot In Constitutional Theory, Benjamin C. Zipursky Jan 2007

Minimalism, Perfectionism, And Common Law Constitutionalism: Reflections On Sunstein's And Fleming's Efforts To Find The Sweet Spot In Constitutional Theory, Benjamin C. Zipursky

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Incredible Shrinking Constitutional Theory: From The Partial Constitution To The Minimal Constitution, James E. Fleming Jan 2007

The Incredible Shrinking Constitutional Theory: From The Partial Constitution To The Minimal Constitution, James E. Fleming

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.


Process Theory, Majoritarianism, And The Original Understanding, William Michael Treanor Jan 2007

Process Theory, Majoritarianism, And The Original Understanding, William Michael Treanor

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.


Fidelity And Constraint , Lawrence Lessig Jan 1997

Fidelity And Constraint , Lawrence Lessig

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.


Discounting Accountability , Abner S. Greene Jan 1997

Discounting Accountability , Abner S. Greene

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.


Fidelity As Translation: Jan 1997

Fidelity As Translation:

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.


Constituting We The People , Mark Tushnet Jan 1997

Constituting We The People , Mark Tushnet

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.


Fidelity Through History And To It: An Impossible Dream, Robert J. Kaczorowski Jan 1997

Fidelity Through History And To It: An Impossible Dream, Robert J. Kaczorowski

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.


Fidelity Through History: Colloquy Jan 1997

Fidelity Through History: Colloquy

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.


Learning From Lincoln , William Michael Treanor Jan 1997

Learning From Lincoln , William Michael Treanor

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.


Reflections On Fidelity , Ronald Dworkin Jan 1997

Reflections On Fidelity , Ronald Dworkin

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.


Let Justice Flow Like Water: The Role Of Moral Arugument In Constitutional Interpretation , David L. Fitzgerald Jan 1997

Let Justice Flow Like Water: The Role Of Moral Arugument In Constitutional Interpretation , David L. Fitzgerald

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.


Practice Of Faith, Martin S. Flaherty Jan 1997

Practice Of Faith, Martin S. Flaherty

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.


A Few Thoughts On Constitutionalism, Textualism, And Populism, Akhil Reed Amar Jan 1997

A Few Thoughts On Constitutionalism, Textualism, And Populism, Akhil Reed Amar

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.


Fidelity Through History (Or Do It), Jack N. Rakove Jan 1997

Fidelity Through History (Or Do It), Jack N. Rakove

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.


Fidelity To History--And Through It, Larry Kramer Jan 1997

Fidelity To History--And Through It, Larry Kramer

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.


Fidelity, Indeterminacy, And The Problem Of Constitutional Evil, Michael J. Klarman Jan 1997

Fidelity, Indeterminacy, And The Problem Of Constitutional Evil, Michael J. Klarman

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.


Does The Constitution Deserve Our Fidelity: Colloquy Jan 1997

Does The Constitution Deserve Our Fidelity: Colloquy

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.


Constitutional Fidelity/Democratic Agency, Frank I. Michelman Jan 1997

Constitutional Fidelity/Democratic Agency, Frank I. Michelman

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.


Translation: Who Needs It , Sanford Levinson Jan 1997

Translation: Who Needs It , Sanford Levinson

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.