Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- AUMF authority (1)
- Article 36 (1)
- Artificial intelligence (1)
- Automation (1)
- Autonomous lethal weapon (1)
-
- Autonomous weapon system (1)
- Autonomy (1)
- Columbia Human Rights Law Review (1)
- Conscientious objection (1)
- Constitutional check (1)
- Critical enemy objeective (1)
- Distinction (1)
- Drone strike (1)
- European Journal of International Law (1)
- Force (1)
- HRW (1)
- Harvard International Law Journal Online (1)
- High value target (1)
- Human Rights Watch (1)
- IHL (1)
- Indiscriminate (1)
- Intelligence preparation of the battlefield (IPB) (1)
- International agencies (1)
- International human rights law (1)
- International humanitarian law (1)
- Law (1)
- Law and justice (1)
- Law of war (1)
- Laws of armed conflict (1)
- Legal history (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Long-Term International Law Implications Of Targeted Killings Practices, Christof Heyns, Sarah Knuckey
The Long-Term International Law Implications Of Targeted Killings Practices, Christof Heyns, Sarah Knuckey
Faculty Scholarship
One of the most crucial and enduring questions about “targeted killings” is: How will the currently expanding practices of singling out individuals in advance and eliminating them in other countries without accountability impact the established international legal system?
International law, since at least World War II, has developed various mechanisms to limit killing in general, including targeted killings. These take the form of vigorous protections for the right to life under human rights law; safeguards against the interstate use of force while permitting states to protect themselves where necessary; and aiming to strike a balance between the principles of humanity …
Regulating Resort To Force: Form And Substance Of The Un Charter Regime, Matthew C. Waxman
Regulating Resort To Force: Form And Substance Of The Un Charter Regime, Matthew C. Waxman
Faculty Scholarship
Much of the international legal debate about regulating force and self-defence takes place on a substantive axis, focusing on the scope of force prohibitions and exceptions. This article instead focuses on their doctrinal form, or modes of argumentation and analysis through which facts are assessed in relation to legal directives, to illuminate how many of the assumptions about substantive policy goals and risks tend to be coupled with other assumptions about the way international law operates in this field. It shows that the flexible, adaptable standards favoured by some states, scholars, and other international actors and the fixed rules and …
Syria, Threats Of Force, And Constitutional War Powers, Matthew C. Waxman
Syria, Threats Of Force, And Constitutional War Powers, Matthew C. Waxman
Faculty Scholarship
In this Essay, Professor Matthew Waxman argues that debates about constitutional war powers neglect the critical role of threats of war or force in American foreign policy. The recent Syria case highlights the President’s vast legal power to threaten military force as well as the political constraints imposed by Congress on such threats. Incorporating threats into an understanding of constitutional powers over war and peace upends traditional arguments about presidential flexibility and congressional checks – arguments that have failed to keep pace with changes in American grand strategy.
The Legal And Ethical Limits Of Technological Warfare Symposium: Roundtable Discussion Transcript, Amos Guiora, Harry Soyster, David Irvine, Geoffrey S. Corn, James Carofano, Claire Finkelstein, Laurie Blank, Monica Hakimi, George R. Lucas, Trevor Morrison, Frédéric Mégret
The Legal And Ethical Limits Of Technological Warfare Symposium: Roundtable Discussion Transcript, Amos Guiora, Harry Soyster, David Irvine, Geoffrey S. Corn, James Carofano, Claire Finkelstein, Laurie Blank, Monica Hakimi, George R. Lucas, Trevor Morrison, Frédéric Mégret
Faculty Scholarship
This article is a transcript of a roundtable discussion from the symposium, The Legal and Ethical Limits of Technological Warfare, February 1, 2013, University of Utah, S.J. Quinney College of Law.
Law And Ethics For Autonomous Weapon Systems: Why A Ban Won't Work And How The Laws Of War Can, Kenneth Anderson, Matthew C. Waxman
Law And Ethics For Autonomous Weapon Systems: Why A Ban Won't Work And How The Laws Of War Can, Kenneth Anderson, Matthew C. Waxman
Faculty Scholarship
Public debate is heating up over the future development of autonomous weapon systems. Some concerned critics portray that future, often invoking science-fiction imagery, as a plain choice between a world in which those systems are banned outright and a world of legal void and ethical collapse on the battlefield. Yet an outright ban on autonomous weapon systems, even if it could be made effective, trades whatever risks autonomous weapon systems might pose in war for the real, if less visible, risk of failing to develop forms of automation that might make the use of force more precise and less harmful …
The Invention Of A Human Right: Conscientious Objection At The United Nations, 1947-2011, Jeremy Kessler
The Invention Of A Human Right: Conscientious Objection At The United Nations, 1947-2011, Jeremy Kessler
Faculty Scholarship
The right of conscientious objection to military service is the most startling of human rights. While human rights generally seek to protect individuals from state power, the right of conscientious objection radically alters the citizen-state relationship, subordinating a state's decisions about national security to the beliefs of the individual citizen. In a world of nation-states jealous of their sovereignty, how did the human right of conscientious objection become an international legal doctrine? By answering that question, this Article both clarifies the legal pedigree of the human right of conscientious objection and sheds new light on the relationship between international human …