Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Cleveland State University

1994

Journal

Reform

Articles 1 - 3 of 3

Full-Text Articles in Law

The Proposed Securities Private Enforcement Reform Act: The Introduction Of Proportionate Liability Into Rule 10b-5 Litigation, Alan S. Ritchie Jan 1994

The Proposed Securities Private Enforcement Reform Act: The Introduction Of Proportionate Liability Into Rule 10b-5 Litigation, Alan S. Ritchie

Cleveland State Law Review

The purpose of this note is to evaluate the ramifications of this particular proposed amendment to the 1934 Act. Part II will summarize the current status of the proposed bill and its provisions. Part I will briefly survey the history and requirements of the private cause of action under Rule 10b-5, particularly the scienter requirement because of its impact on the understanding of the proposed reform. Finally, Part l will address the justifications for the proposed reform, and the effects the reform will have on 10b-5 litigation.


Regulatory Theory And Deposit Insurance Reform, R. Mark Williamson Jan 1994

Regulatory Theory And Deposit Insurance Reform, R. Mark Williamson

Cleveland State Law Review

The purpose of this article, however, is not to summarize the maze of federal and state banking regulation. Instead, recognizing that deposit insurance is a centerpiece of the overall regulatory scheme to which any financial institution in the United States is subject, this article is primarily concerned with subjecting this form of bank regulation to analysis based upon general principles of regulatory theory. This article is less concerned with the details of banking law than it is with using regulatory to shape policy guidelines for the coming process of deposit insurance reform.


Regulatory Theory And Deposit Insurance Reform, R. Mark Williamson Jan 1994

Regulatory Theory And Deposit Insurance Reform, R. Mark Williamson

Cleveland State Law Review

The purpose of this article, however, is not to summarize the maze of federal and state banking regulation. Instead, recognizing that deposit insurance is a centerpiece of the overall regulatory scheme to which any financial institution in the United States is subject, this article is primarily concerned with subjecting this form of bank regulation to analysis based upon general principles of regulatory theory. This article is less concerned with the details of banking law than it is with using regulatory to shape policy guidelines for the coming process of deposit insurance reform.