Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Cleveland State University

Labor and Employment Law

Labor law

Articles 1 - 3 of 3

Full-Text Articles in Law

Extending Weingarten To The Nonunion Setting: A History Of Oscillation, Sarah C. Flannery Jan 2001

Extending Weingarten To The Nonunion Setting: A History Of Oscillation, Sarah C. Flannery

Cleveland State Law Review

Passed in response to the nineteenth century hostility towards union activity, the NLRA traditionally was viewed as a pro-union statute. However, as much as the Act contains provisions clearly aimed at protecting union activity, the Act explicitly applies to non-union employees as well as union employees. Nevertheless, many nonunion employers and employees are unaware of the existence of the NLRA despite it being the only law governing the relationship between an employer and its employees as a group in most private sector establishments in this country. This Note analyzes the conflicting history surrounding this issue and asserts that the necessary …


The Shore Line Status Quo Requirement, Daniel R. Elliott Iii Jan 1998

The Shore Line Status Quo Requirement, Daniel R. Elliott Iii

Cleveland State Law Review

This article examines the Supreme Court’s 1969 decision in Detroit & Toledo Shore Line Railroad v. United Transportation Union. It discusses the decisions following 1969 that weakened the Shore Line holding and thus undermined one of the principal purposes behind the Railway Labor Act. Part I lays out the background of the Railway Labor Act status quo requirements. Part II delves into the Shore Line decision. Part III explains the effect subsequent status quo decisions have had on the Shore Line holding. Part IV discusses related case law that also impacted the Shore Line holding. And finally, Part V points …


Workmen's Compensation - Evidence - Opinion Of Non-Treating Psychiatrist Based On Claimant's Statements Held Inadmissible - Candella V. Subsequent Injury Fund, Kevin F. O'Neill Oct 1976

Workmen's Compensation - Evidence - Opinion Of Non-Treating Psychiatrist Based On Claimant's Statements Held Inadmissible - Candella V. Subsequent Injury Fund, Kevin F. O'Neill

Law Faculty Articles and Essays

Discusses evidentiary requirements in Workers' Compensation cases and circuit court review of Workers' Compensation Commission decisions.