Law Commons^™

Analyze The Practical Differences And Issues, If Any, In Prosecuting The Crimes Of Aiding The Enemy Under Article 104 Of The Ucmj, Treason, And Material Support For Terrorism. Has The Offense Of "Material Support For Terrorism," As Defined In The Military Commissions Act Of 2009 (10 U.S.C. § 950 T (27)), Been Tried By U.S. Military Commissions Or Foreign Military Tribunals Enforcing The Law Of War? Please Consider Whether The Ucmj/Mca Crime Of “Aiding The Enemy” 1) Is Comparable To Any International Offenses; 2) Analyze The Practical Differences And Issues , If Any, In Prosecuting The Crimes Of Aiding The Enemy (Under Article 104 Of The Ucmj) And Treason; 3) Is A Duty Of Allegiance Necessary To Prosecute Someone For The Ucmj Crime (Article 104) Of Aiding The Enemy; 4) Based On The Language Of The Offense Contained In The Ucmj And Manual For Courts-Martial (Governed By Executive Order), Can “Any Person” Regardless Of Military Status Actually Be Prosecuted In A Court Martial For Aiding The Enemy Under Ucmj Article 104; And 5) Analyze The Feasibility Of A Prosecutor In A Military Commission Charging An Alien With Article 104 Of The Ucmj, Taking Into Account Consideration Of Whether Or Not There Is A Duty Of Allegiance., Nicholas Noah Hossin Jan 2015

A Comprehensive Study To Determine The Elements And Scope Of Convictions For Aiding And Abetting, As Illustrated By Case Law From The International Criminal Tribunals, Katharine Gibson Jan 2008