Law Commons^™

Appeal No. 0856: City Of North Royalton, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 2013-181; Mandatory Pooling (Callas #8HD Well; Cutter Oil Company)

Appeal No. 0868: M&R Investments Ohio Llc, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 2014-129, Chief's Orders 2014-130 (Alfman AP #1 Well and Ruth Porter #1 Well)

Appeal No. 0867: M&R Investments Ohio Llc, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 2014-129, Chief's Orders 2014-130 (Alfman AP #1 Well and Ruth Porter #1 Well)

Appeal No. 0860: Big Sky Energy, Inc., V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 2014-43 & 2014-44; (Miller #1 Well; bond forfeiture; Cincinnati Insurance Co.)

Appeal No. 0861: Big Sky Energy, Inc., V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 2014-43 & 2014-44; (Miller #1 Well; bond forfeiture; Cincinnati Insurance Co.)

Appeal No. 0888: Edco Drilling And Producing, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 2014-254 (Hedrick #1A Well)

Appeal No. 0858: Fresh Water Accountability Project, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 2014-08 (EnerGreen 360 Facility)

Appeal No. 0869: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 2014-127 (Crum-Shocking #1 Well)

Appeal No. 0865: Spring Industries, Inc., V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 2014-73, Chief's Orders 2014-74 (Straub #1 and #3 Wells)

Appeal No. 0866: Spring Industries, Inc., V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 2014-73, Chief's Orders 2014-74 (Straub #1 and #3 Wells)

Appeal No. 0855: Athens County Fracking Action Network, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Issuance of Injection Well Permit SWI! #10 (K & H Partners, LLC)

Appeal No. 0857: James M. Huebner, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 2013-182; Mandatory Pooling (Sisko Unit #1 Well; Everflow Eastern Partners L.P. Inc.)

Appeal No. 0854: Big Sky Energy, Inc., V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 2013-39 & 2013-40 (the Powelson #1 & #2 Wells)

Appeal No. 0853: Big Sky Energy, Inc., V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 2013-39 & 2013-40 (the Powelson #1 & #2 Wells)

Appeal No. 0851: Big Sky Energy, Inc., V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management And Lorrie & Lori Accettola V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 2013-37 & 2013-38 (Cutter Well #1 & Cutter Well #2)

Appeal No. 0852: Big Sky Energy, Inc., V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management And Lorrie & Lori Accettola V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Orders 2013-37 & 2013-38 (Cutter Well #1 & Cutter Well #2)

Evaluating Trickle Down Charity, Matthew Rossman

Faculty Publications

As our nation's philanthropic sector becomes more entrepreneurial, ambitious and influenced by the private sector, longstanding legal standards on what constitutes “charity” struggle to stay relevant. More and more often, organizations that seek classification by the Internal Revenue Service as a Section 501(c)(3) charity (and the substantial public subsidy that this status unlocks) are not the soup kitchens and homeless shelters of yesteryear, but highly sophisticated ventures which accomplish their missions in ways that are less obviously charitable. In no case is this more true than in the recent widespread emergence of nonprofit organizations whose primary activity is providing direct …

The Right To Appeal, Julia Liston

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Categorization Of Detainees And Standards Of Detention, Ellen Van Cleave

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Does Political Pressure Necessarily Amount To Political Interference. Specifically Addressing What Can Be Done To Alleviate Worries That Political Pressure Amounts To Political Interference Within The International Courts, Alexis Lee Krivoshik

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Whether The Special Tribunal For Lebanon Is Properly Considered To Be More A Civil Law Institution Or A Common Law Institution., Estefanía Sixto Seijas

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Us-Visit System, Malea R. Hetrick

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Under Domestic And International Law, When Does Non-International Armed Conflict Begin, And When Does It End?, Katherine A. Mozynski

War Crimes Memoranda

No abstract provided.

Presumed Imminence: Judicial Risk Assessment In The Post-9/11 World, Avidan Y. Cover

Faculty Publications

Court opinions in the terrorism context are often distinguished by fact-finding that relates to risk assessment. These risk assessments — inherently policy decisions — are influenced by cultural cognition and by cognitive errors common to probability determinations, particularly those made regarding highly dangerous and emotional events. In a post-9/11 world, in which prevention and intelligence are prioritized over prosecution, courts are more likely to overstate the potential harm, neglect the probability, and presume the imminence of terrorist attacks. As a result, courts are apt to defer to the government and require less evidence in support of measures that curtail civil …

Did The Sixteenth Amendment Ever Matter? Does It Matter Today?, Erik M. Jensen

Faculty Publications

This article, prepared for a symposium on the centennial of the ratification of the Sixteenth Amendment, argues that the Amendment was legally and politically necessary in 1913, if there was going to be a modern income tax, and that it remains significant today. The Amendment provides that “taxes on incomes” need not be apportioned among the states on the basis of population, as would otherwise be required for direct taxes. An apportioned income tax would be an absurdity, and, if there were no Amendment, Congress could not enact an unapportioned tax on income from property, the sort of tax that …

Filling The Gaps With Public Policy: The Application Of The Hague Convention Protocol In Us Courts In The Absence Of A Co-Signing State, Andrew A. Zashin, Christopher R. Reynolds, Amy M. Keating

Faculty Publications

This article will consider a possible avenue for filling 'gaps' when the 1980 Hague Abduction Convention or the 1996 Child Protection Convention do not apply in child custody/abduction cases. Specifically, it will explore utilizing internal US domestic relations law to facilitate the return of a child who has been abducted to the USA from a non-signatory country. To better illustrate the potential effects, the article will explore this 'gap filler' through the lens of a case study involving Japan, the most prominent first world country that is not yet a signatory to the Convention. The article also considers the implications …

Private Ordering In The Market For Professional Services, Cassandra Burke Robertson

Faculty Publications

Freedom of contract is significantly restricted in the market for professional services. Under the so-called “corporate practice doctrine,” professionals such as doctors and lawyers are prohibited from practicing within corporate entities, and laypeople are likewise prohibited from investing in professional service firms. Defenders of this prohibition argue that it can be justified as a means of protecting professional independence and thereby increasing the quality of care. In fact, however, the available evidence suggests that investment restrictions are counterproductive to their stated goal. In practice, these restrictions raise costs and reduce access without measurably improving the quality of service at all. …

Corporate Governance Without Shareholders: A Cautionary Lesson From Non-Profit Organizations, George W. Dent

Faculty Publications

A debate about corporate governance has long raged over the allocation of power between shareholders and directors. Proponents of “shareholder primacy” believe that the corporate board should be chosen by and accountable to the stockholders rather than dominated by the CEO, as they believe is common now. Advocates of “director primacy” want to limit shareholder power because they believe that shareholders have conflicting objectives, are uninformed, and pressure the directors to sacrifice the long-term health of the company to short-term share price.

The governance of non-profit organizations (“NPOs”) offers an example that illuminates the corporate governance debate. Directors of NPOs …

Regulating Electronic Legal Support Across State And National Boundaries, Cassandra Burke Robertson

Faculty Publications

Technology and globalization are changing the practice of law and creating new challenges for lawyer regulation. Middle-class litigants who struggle to afford legal services — but are comfortable using online resources — are increasingly seeking and finding legal support online. State and national boundaries dissolve in the online marketplace, making it easy for attorneys to provide services to litigants in other jurisdictions. Differences in national economies make it cost effective for both clients and lawyers to engage in transnational practice, so that attorneys in India and other jurisdictions can offer legal support and advice to American litigants for as little …

The Breach Of The Common Law Trust Relationship Between The United States And African Americans – A Substantive Right To Reparations, Ayesha Bell Hardaway

Faculty Publications

Domination and elaborate control of Africans in colonial America, and later the United States, were exerted to provide the requisite framework for the economically profitable Trans-Atlantic slave trade. Proponents of slavery characterized the aims of slavery in pseudo-paternalistic terms to “train” and “civilize[e] the untutored savage.” Even after the formal end of slavery, the U.S. and local governments continued to exercise its domination and elaborate control by enforcing a national system of racial segregation and discrimination. That system of government-sanctioned laws was so pervasive and commonly accepted that it has been personified as “Jim Crow.” As a result, racial hierarchy …