Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Access to justice (3)
- Champerty (2)
- Consumer protection (2)
- Contingency fees (2)
- Litigation finance (2)
-
- Predatory lending (2)
- Third party litigation funding (2)
- Tort litigation (2)
- ADR (1)
- ATCA (1)
- ATS (1)
- Alternative dispute resolution (1)
- B.P. (1)
- Business (1)
- Chevron (1)
- Corporate social responsibility (1)
- Dispute resolution (1)
- Environmental litigation (1)
- FDI (1)
- Focal point coordination (1)
- Foreign direct investment (1)
- Foreign judgment enforcement (1)
- Forum non conveniens (1)
- Human rights (1)
- Kiobel (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Mass torts (1)
- Mediation (1)
- Oligopoly pricing (1)
- Plus factors (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Case For An International Court Of Civil Justice, Maya Steinitz
The Case For An International Court Of Civil Justice, Maya Steinitz
Books
When multinational corporations cause mass harms to lives, livelihoods, and the environment in developing countries, it is nearly impossible for victims to find a court that can and will issue an enforceable judgment. In this work, Professor Maya Steinitz presents a detailed rationale for the creation of an International Court of Civil Justice (ICCJ) to hear such transnational mass tort cases. The world's legal systems were not designed to solve these kinds of complex transnational disputes, and the absence of mechanisms to ensure coordination means that victims try, but fail, to find justice in country after country, court after court. …
Oligopoly Pricing And Richard Posner, Keith N. Hylton
Oligopoly Pricing And Richard Posner, Keith N. Hylton
Faculty Scholarship
Over a span of nearly 50 years Richard Posner’s voice has loomed large over the subject of oligopoly pricingand antitrust. The span begins in 1969 with Posner’s publication of “Oligopoly and the Antitrust Laws: A Suggested Approach,” which argues for more aggressive enforcement of Section 1 in cases involving circumstantial evidence of conspiracy. The span ends with Posner’s opinion in In re Text Messaging Antitrust Litigation, in 2015. The two writings, the first an academic article published early in Posner’s career and the second a judicial opinion published near the end of his time on the bench, suggest very different …
Letter To The Hon. Sen. Orrt (Nys Senate) Regarding Litigation Finance (Lawsuit Lending) (2018), Maya Steinitz
Letter To The Hon. Sen. Orrt (Nys Senate) Regarding Litigation Finance (Lawsuit Lending) (2018), Maya Steinitz
Faculty Scholarship
Following testimony to the New York State Senate's Standing Committee on Consumer Protection (available on SSRN and YouTube), Professor Steinitz was asked to elaborate on her recommendation for a statutory minimum recovery requirement to protect consumers of litigation financing. Enclosed is her response to this inquiry.
Testimony On Third Party Financing Of Lawsuits, Maya Steinitz
Testimony On Third Party Financing Of Lawsuits, Maya Steinitz
Faculty Scholarship
In this written testimony, Professor Steinitz addresses bills pending in the New York State Senate and Assembly relating to consumer litigation finance. Among other things, she suggests (1) establishing a “Minimum Payment” for plaintiffs, instead of (or in addition to) flat rates or interest caps; and (2) defining the scope of application by applying an “Unsophisticated Plaintiff” test rather than by focusing on the financing amount. She also addresses other matters implicated by the bills such as whether lawyers should be permitted to provide financial advice, prohibition of prepayment penalties, registration requirements, and right of rescission in the context of …
Adr And Access To Justice: Current Perspectives, Rory Van Loo, Ellen E. Deason, Michael Z. Green, Donna Shestowsky, Ellen Waldman
Adr And Access To Justice: Current Perspectives, Rory Van Loo, Ellen E. Deason, Michael Z. Green, Donna Shestowsky, Ellen Waldman
Faculty Scholarship
Access to justice is a broad topic, and we cannot cover everything. You will notice a few major omissions. Most notably, we are not going to emphasize consumer pre-dispute arbitration agreements. This is not because they are not important, but because much has been written and said on this topic, and it could easily swallow the whole discussion. Also, we are probably not going to say very much about restorative justice, and I am sure you will notice some other holes. We invite you to raise missing issues in your comments.
Let me start with a few opening remarks. We …