Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Hold-Up And Patent Licensing Of Cumulative Innovations With Private Information, James Bessen
Hold-Up And Patent Licensing Of Cumulative Innovations With Private Information, James Bessen
Faculty Scholarship
When innovation is cumulative, early patentees hold claims against later innovators. Then potential hold-up may cause prospective second stage innovators to forego investing in R&D. It is sometimes argued that ex ante licensing (before R&D) avoids hold-up. This paper explores ex ante licensing when information about development cost is private. In this case, contracts may not be written ex ante. Moreover, the socially optimal division of profit occurs with weak patents and ex post licensing. Empirical evidence on licensing conforms to a model with private information. In some innovative industries, little ex ante licensing occurs, suggesting hold-up remains a problem.
Excuse And Justification In The Law Of Fair Use: Commodification And Market Perspectives, Wendy J. Gordon
Excuse And Justification In The Law Of Fair Use: Commodification And Market Perspectives, Wendy J. Gordon
Faculty Scholarship
Over twenty years ago, the Journal of the Copyright Society of the U.S.A. reprinted my article, "Fair Use as Market Failure" (82 Columbia Law Review 1600 (1982), available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3577724. That 1982 piece suggested that an underlying pattern governs the protean forms of "fair use", and I employed the notion of market failure to reveal and explain how the pattern functioned. Since then, some misunderstandings of my argument have arisen.
I am pleased to publish in this, the Fiftieth Anniversary issue of the Journal of the Copyright Society, a clarification – and partial amendment – of my position. As …
Authors, Publishers And Public Goods: Trading Gold For Dross, Wendy J. Gordon
Authors, Publishers And Public Goods: Trading Gold For Dross, Wendy J. Gordon
Faculty Scholarship
The article seeks to clarify what is at stake - and what is not - in the litigation challenging the constitutional validity of the Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act (CTEA). First, the article distinguishes between the CTEA's retrospective term extension of copyright term and the retrospective extensions enacted by prior Congresses. The article suggests that the CTEA provisions are constitutionally questionable in ways that earlier retrospective extensions may not have been. To hold the CTEA unconstitutional would not make all other term extensions vulnerable.
Second, the article shows how non-creative physical activities such as digitization and film preservation have …