Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (5)
- Constitutional Law (5)
- Law and Race (5)
- Law and Society (3)
- Supreme Court of the United States (3)
-
- Courts (2)
- Education Law (2)
- Law and Gender (2)
- Legal Profession (2)
- American Politics (1)
- American Studies (1)
- Arts and Humanities (1)
- Communication (1)
- Criminal Law (1)
- Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies (1)
- Gender, Race, Sexuality, and Ethnicity in Communication (1)
- Judges (1)
- Legal Biography (1)
- Legal Education (1)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (1)
- Legal Studies (1)
- Legal Theory (1)
- Legal Writing and Research (1)
- Other American Studies (1)
- Political Science (1)
- Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (1)
- Race and Ethnicity (1)
- Race, Ethnicity and Post-Colonial Studies (1)
- Social Policy (1)
- Institution
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 10 of 10
Full-Text Articles in Law
Perkembangan Pengaturan Tindakan Afirmasi Perempuan Pada Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia, Ishmah Naqiyyah
Perkembangan Pengaturan Tindakan Afirmasi Perempuan Pada Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia, Ishmah Naqiyyah
Jurnal Konstitusi & Demokrasi
This research discusses the development of affirmative action arrangements to increase women's representation in the DPR RI and how the implementation of these arrangements since the beginning of affirmative action was applied in 2004 until the last time affirmative action for the DPR was applied, namely in 2014. The research method used is normative juridical with a legal history approach. The discussion begins by analyzing affirmative action in the Political Party Law, the General Election Law for Members of the DPR, DPD, and DPRD, and the Law on the People's Consultative Assembly, the House of Representatives, the Regional Representatives Council, …
Through A Glass, Darkly: Systemic Racism, Affirmative Action, And Disproportionate Minority Contact, Robin Walker Sterling
Through A Glass, Darkly: Systemic Racism, Affirmative Action, And Disproportionate Minority Contact, Robin Walker Sterling
Michigan Law Review
This Article is the first to describe how systemic racism persists in a society that openly denounces racism and racist behaviors, using affirmative action and disproportionate minority contact as contrasting examples. Affirmative action and disproportionate minority contact are two sides of the same coin. Far from being distinct, these two social institutions function as two sides of the same ideology, sharing a common historical nucleus rooted in the mythologies that sustained chattel slavery in the United States. The effects of these narratives continue to operate in race-related jurisprudence and in the criminal legal system, sending normative messages about race and …
Affirmative Action And The Leadership Pipeline, Joni Hersch
Affirmative Action And The Leadership Pipeline, Joni Hersch
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
Recent events have brought heightened attention to racial injustice in the United States, which includes among its legacies a dearth of Black people in influential positions that shape society. But at the same time that the United States has turned its attention to diversity in leadership positions, the already narrow pipeline for those from underrepresented groups is likely to narrow even further in the near future. Specifically, the pipeline to influential positions in society typically flows from an elite education. Race-conscious affirmative action in higher education admissions is currently permitted in order for universities to meet their compelling interest in …
Chief Justice John Roberts: Institutionalist Or Hubris-In-Chief?, Eric J. Segall
Chief Justice John Roberts: Institutionalist Or Hubris-In-Chief?, Eric J. Segall
Washington and Lee Law Review Online
The conventional wisdom among Supreme Court scholars and commentators is that Chief Justice John Roberts is an institutionalist who cares deeply about both his personal legacy and the Supreme Court’s prestige over time. This essay challenges that belief. While the Chief certainly cares about how the Court is perceived by the public, as do most of the justices, what most defines Roberts is his hubris—not a concern for the Court’s legitimacy or even his own place in history. Across the vast landscape of constitutional law, Roberts has distorted precedent and ignored text and history to further his own policy preferences. …
Affirmative Inaction: A Quantitative Analysis Of Progress Toward “Critical Mass” In U.S. Legal Education, Loren M. Lee
Affirmative Inaction: A Quantitative Analysis Of Progress Toward “Critical Mass” In U.S. Legal Education, Loren M. Lee
Michigan Law Review
Since 1978, the Supreme Court has recognized diversity as a compelling government interest to uphold the use of affirmative action in higher education. Yet the constitutionality of the practice has been challenged many times. In Grutter v. Bollinger, for example, the Court denied its use in perpetuity and suggested a twenty-five-year time limit for its application in law school admissions. Almost two decades have passed, so where do we stand? This Note’s quantitative analysis of the matriculation of and degrees awarded to Black and Latinx students at twenty-nine accredited law schools across the United States illuminates a stark lack of …
“Trumping” Affirmative Action, Vinay Harpalani
“Trumping” Affirmative Action, Vinay Harpalani
Faculty Scholarship
This Essay examines the Trump administration’s actions to eliminate affirmative action, along with the broader ramifications of these actions. While former-President Trump’s judicial appointments have garnered much attention, the Essay focuses on the actions of his Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division. It lays out the Department of Justice’s investigations of Harvard and Yale, highlighting how they have augmented recent lawsuits challenging race-conscious admissions policies by Students for Fair Admissions. It considers the timing of the DOJ’s actions, particularly with respect to Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard College. It examines the strategies used by …
The Long Shortlist: Women Considered For The Supreme Court, Michael Conklin
The Long Shortlist: Women Considered For The Supreme Court, Michael Conklin
Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity
No abstract provided.
Rejecting Honorary Whiteness: Asian Americans And The Attack On Race-Conscious Admissions, Philip Lee
Rejecting Honorary Whiteness: Asian Americans And The Attack On Race-Conscious Admissions, Philip Lee
Faculty Publications
Since the 1960s, Asian Americans have been labeled by the dominant society as the “model minority.” This status is commonly juxtaposed against so-called “problem” minorities such as African Americans and Latinx Americans. In theory, the model minority narrative serves as living proof that racial barriers to social and economic development no longer exist in America. If Asians can succeed against all odds, the reasoning goes, so can everyone else. Further, if a member of a minority group fails, it is because of their own lack of diligence and ambition, and not some supposed systemic unfairness. However, the model minority narrative …
Males Need Not Apply: Assessing The Legality Of American University Business Law Review's All-Female Issue, Michael Conklin
Males Need Not Apply: Assessing The Legality Of American University Business Law Review's All-Female Issue, Michael Conklin
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Lawyers For White People?, Jessie Allen
Lawyers For White People?, Jessie Allen
Articles
This article investigates an anomalous legal ethics rule, and in the process exposes how current equal protection doctrine distorts civil rights regulation. When in 2016 the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct finally adopted its first ever rule forbidding discrimination in the practice of law, the rule carried a strange exemption: it does not apply to lawyers’ acceptance or rejection of clients. The exemption for client selection seems wrong. It contradicts the common understanding that in the U.S. today businesses may not refuse service on discriminatory grounds. It sends a message that lawyers enjoy a professional prerogative to discriminate against …