Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Institution
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 19 of 19
Full-Text Articles in Law
Appeal No. 0778: Century Well Service V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0778: Century Well Service V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2006-137
Appeal No. 0779: Darrell Yoder, Dba Double "D" V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0779: Darrell Yoder, Dba Double "D" V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2007-27
Appeal No. 0762: B T Energy V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0762: B T Energy V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 2006-94 & 2006-96
Appeal No. 0763: B T Energy V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0763: B T Energy V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 2006-94 & 2006-96
Appeal No. 0764: Stonebridge Operating Co. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0764: Stonebridge Operating Co. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2006-98 & 2006-121
Appeal No. 0777: Mike Johnson V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0777: Mike Johnson V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2006-131
Appeal No. 0776: Stream Global Investments, Llc V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0776: Stream Global Investments, Llc V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2006-130
Collaborative Public Audit Of The November 2006 General Election, S. Candice Hoke, Collaborative Audit Committee
Collaborative Public Audit Of The November 2006 General Election, S. Candice Hoke, Collaborative Audit Committee
Law Faculty Reports and Comments
We hope that this Audit Report will assist the Ohio Secretary of State, all Ohio local Boards of Election, election reform organizations, and other election officials nationwide in seeing how an independent audit process can be created and function at the local level. Additionally, we hope the public will recognize that this Report contains the kind of information that all election administrative agencies need to better achieve the public charge for producing accurate election results and to facilitate sound improvements in election administrative practices.
Appeal No. 0772: Mike Johnson V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0772: Mike Johnson V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2006-105
Appeal No. 0773: Eugene Martz, Village Of Hartville V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management & Excalibur Exploration, Inc., Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0773: Eugene Martz, Village Of Hartville V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management & Excalibur Exploration, Inc., Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2006-116 (Excalibur Exploration)
Appeal No. 0771: Eugene Martz, Village Of Hartville V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management & Excalibur Exploration, Inc., Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0771: Eugene Martz, Village Of Hartville V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management & Excalibur Exploration, Inc., Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2006-116 (Excalibur Exploration)
Appeal No. 0773: Eugene Martz, Village Of Hartville V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management & Excalibur Exploration, Inc., Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0773: Eugene Martz, Village Of Hartville V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management & Excalibur Exploration, Inc., Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2006-116 (Excalibur Exploration)
Appeal No. 0770: Peoples Petroleum V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0770: Peoples Petroleum V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2006-118
Appeal No. 0771: Eugene Martz, Village Of Hartville V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management & Excalibur Exploration, Inc., Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0771: Eugene Martz, Village Of Hartville V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management & Excalibur Exploration, Inc., Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2006-116 (Excalibur Exploration)
Driving Through The Dense Fog: Analysis Of And Proposed Changes To Ohio Tortious Interference Law, Eric P. Voigt
Driving Through The Dense Fog: Analysis Of And Proposed Changes To Ohio Tortious Interference Law, Eric P. Voigt
Eric P. Voigt
This Article summarizes and analyzes each element of a claim for tortious interference with a contract or a business relationship under Ohio law. It argues that certain conduct should constitute tortious interference and that other conduct should not. Although my Article focuses on Ohio law, it has a national application. The Article argues that the law of tortious interference should be developed to further competition, to protect the contractual rights of parties, and to encourage freedom of action for the alleged interferer.
This Article (1) discusses when businesses and competitors may lawfully interfere with the contracts or business relationships of …
Speeding Towards Disaster: How Cleveland's Traffic Cameras Violate The Ohio Constitution, Kevin P. Shannon
Speeding Towards Disaster: How Cleveland's Traffic Cameras Violate The Ohio Constitution, Kevin P. Shannon
Cleveland State Law Review
Part II of this paper describes the history and development of traffic cameras. It includes a discussion of how the two systems used by Cleveland (red-light and speeding cameras) operate. It also gives a general background of the relationship between cities and camera vendors. Part III provides the legal background of traffic cameras. It begins by examining the various arguments that have been leveled against cameras and then examines the litigation to date challenging traffic cameras. Next, this Note discusses the scholarly literature on the subject and explains how this argument situates itself in the debate. Part IV gives traffic …
Foot And Mouth Disease Responses In Ohio, Leah Dorman
Foot And Mouth Disease Responses In Ohio, Leah Dorman
Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law
No abstract provided.
Driving Through The Dense Fog: Analysis Of And Proposed Changes To Ohio Tortious Interference Law, Eric P. Voigt
Driving Through The Dense Fog: Analysis Of And Proposed Changes To Ohio Tortious Interference Law, Eric P. Voigt
Cleveland State Law Review
This Article summarizes and analyzes each element of a claim for tortious interference with a contract or a business relationship under Ohio law. It argues that certain conduct should constitute tortious interference and that other conduct should not. Although my Article focuses on Ohio law, it has a national application. The Article argues that the law of tortious interference should be developed to further competition, to protect the contractual rights of parties, and to encourage freedom of action for the alleged interferer. This Article (1) discusses when businesses and competitors may lawfully interfere with the contracts or business relationships of …
Mission Accomplished?, Ellen D. Katz
Mission Accomplished?, Ellen D. Katz
Articles
My study of voting rights violations nationwide suggests that voting problems are more prevalent in places “covered” by the Act than elsewhere. Professor Persily’s careful and measured defense of the renewed statute posits that this evidence is the best available to support reauthorization. The evidence matters because if, as critics charge, the regional provisions of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) are no longer needed, minority voters should confront fewer obstacles to political participation in places where additional federal safeguards protect minority interests than in places where these safeguards do not operate. In fact, minority voters confront more.