Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- First Amendment (12)
- Constitutional Law (4)
- Internet Law (3)
- Banking and Finance Law (2)
- Business Organizations Law (2)
-
- Conflict of Laws (2)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (2)
- Supreme Court of the United States (2)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Communications Law (1)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (1)
- Election Law (1)
- Intellectual Property Law (1)
- Judges (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Labor and Employment Law (1)
- Legal Biography (1)
- Legal History (1)
- Legislation (1)
- Rule of Law (1)
- Sexuality and the Law (1)
- Transnational Law (1)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (4)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (2)
- Duke Law (2)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (2)
- Chapman University (1)
-
- Columbia Law School (1)
- Cornell University Law School (1)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- Marquette University Law School (1)
- Penn State Law (1)
- University of Baltimore Law (1)
- University of Colorado Law School (1)
- University of Miami Law School (1)
- University of Missouri School of Law (1)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (1)
- West Virginia University (1)
- Publication
-
- Case Western Reserve Law Review (2)
- Faculty Articles (2)
- Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (2)
- Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review (2)
-
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy (1)
- Duke Law Journal (1)
- Faculty Publications (1)
- Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law (1)
- Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1)
- Journal Articles (1)
- Law Faculty Articles and Research (1)
- Marquette Sports Law Review (1)
- Publications (1)
- University of Miami Law Review (1)
- West Virginia Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 22 of 22
Full-Text Articles in Law
Eldred's Aftermath: Tradition, The Copyright Clause, And The Constitutionalization Of Fair Use, Stephen M. Mcjohn
Eldred's Aftermath: Tradition, The Copyright Clause, And The Constitutionalization Of Fair Use, Stephen M. Mcjohn
Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review
Eldred v. Ashcroft offered the Supreme Court broad issues about the scope of Congress's constitutional power to legislate in the area of intellectual property. In 1998, Congress added twenty years to the term of all copyrights, both existing and future copyrights. But for this term extension, works created during the 1920s and 1930s would be entering the public domain. Now such works will remain under copyright until 2018 and beyond. Eldred v. Ashcroft rejected two challenges to the constitutionality of the copyright extension. The first challenge contended that Congress had exceeded its power to grant copyrights for "limited Times" in …
Republican Party Of Minnesota V. White: The End Of Judicial Election Reform, Lindsay E. Lippman
Republican Party Of Minnesota V. White: The End Of Judicial Election Reform, Lindsay E. Lippman
Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy
No abstract provided.
The Indispensable State, Irwin P. Stotzky
The Indispensable State, Irwin P. Stotzky
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
Regulating Speech Across Borders: Technology Vs. Values, Matthew Fagin
Regulating Speech Across Borders: Technology Vs. Values, Matthew Fagin
Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review
The disfavored status within international law of unilateral state-based regulations that target extraterritorial actors arises from the inherent challenges such actions represent to state sovereignty. In the context of the Internet, the complexity of choice-of-law analysis is heightened: regulations imposed by one state have the potential to effectively block communications to citizens of all states and undermine the conflicting regulatory aims of neighboring states. Early legal commentators built upon this cascading chilling effect of state-based regulation to proclaim both the futility and illegitimacy of state-based action in the online environment. Subsequent scholars have demonstrated the commensurability of state-based online regulation …
Freedom In The Commons: Towards A Political Economy Of Information, Yochai Benkler
Freedom In The Commons: Towards A Political Economy Of Information, Yochai Benkler
Duke Law Journal
In 1999, George Lucas released a bloated and much maligned “prequel” to the Star Wars Trilogy, called The Phantom Menace. In 2001, a disappointed Star Wars fan made a more tightly cut version, which almost eliminated a main sidekick called Jar-Jar Binks and subtly changed the protagonist—rendering Anakin Skywalker, who was destined to become Darth Vader, a much more somber child than the movie had originally presented. The edited version was named “The Phantom Edit.” Lucas was initially reported amused, but later clamped down on distribution. It was too late. The Phantom Edit had done something that would have been …
The (Un)Informed Electorate: Insights Into The Supreme Court's Electoral Speech Cases, Raleigh Hannah Levine
The (Un)Informed Electorate: Insights Into The Supreme Court's Electoral Speech Cases, Raleigh Hannah Levine
Case Western Reserve Law Review
No abstract provided.
Discussing The First Amendment , Christina E. Wells
Discussing The First Amendment , Christina E. Wells
Faculty Publications
Despite its many good qualities, Eternally Vigilant nevertheless suffers from a flaw common to First Amendment scholarship--a tendency to give short shrift to study of the social, psychological, historical, and political factors that influence the Court's decision making and, thus, free speech doctrine. Discussion including these influences would facilitate an even greater understanding of free speech doctrine and the principles that underlie it.
Judicial Elections, Campaign Financing, And Free Speech, Ronald D. Rotunda
Judicial Elections, Campaign Financing, And Free Speech, Ronald D. Rotunda
Law Faculty Articles and Research
No abstract provided.
Right To Write - Free Expression Rights Of Pennsylvania's Creative Students After Columbine, Barbara Brunner
Right To Write - Free Expression Rights Of Pennsylvania's Creative Students After Columbine, Barbara Brunner
Journal Articles
This comment analyzes the current state of students' free speech rights in the context of creative writing assignments and examines potential First Amendment applications to the Pennsylvania System of School Assessment (PSSA), a statewide, mandatory, standards-based exam administered to Pennsylvania public school students. The PSSA, which currently contains a writing assessment for students in sixth, ninth, and eleventh grades requiring students to write essays in response to prompts, is scored anonymously by private entities under contract with the Pennsylvania Department of Education. Those private subcontractors have "red-flagging" procedures in place to identify essays containing imagery or themes that indicate imminent …
"Electioneering Communication" Under The Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act Of 2002: A Constitutional Reclassification Of "Express Advocacy", Ryan Ellis
Case Western Reserve Law Review
No abstract provided.
Introduction: The Yahoo! Case And Conflict Of Laws In The Cyberage, Mathias Reimann
Introduction: The Yahoo! Case And Conflict Of Laws In The Cyberage, Mathias Reimann
Michigan Journal of International Law
Three years ago, two French public interest groups, La Ligue Contre le Racisme et L'Antisemitisme (LICRA) and LUnion des Etudiants Juifs De France (UEJF), sued Yahoo! Inc., a Delaware corporation headquartered near Santa Barbara, California, in the Tribunal de Grande Instance in Paris. The undisputed facts underlying the complaint were that: Yahoo! Inc. operated, inter alia, an auction website on which various Nazi memorabilia (such as flags, stamps, and military souvenirs) were offered for sale; the respective Yahoo! Inc. website was accessible in France; and the display of the Nazi memorabilia was illegal under French law. The French plaintiffs sought …
Religious Expression, Government Funds, And The First Amendment, Suart J. Lark
Religious Expression, Government Funds, And The First Amendment, Suart J. Lark
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Civil Rights And Civil Liberties: Whose “Rule Of Law”?, William W. Van Alstyne
Civil Rights And Civil Liberties: Whose “Rule Of Law”?, William W. Van Alstyne
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Public Importance: Balancing Proprietary Rights And The Right To Know, Eric Easton
Public Importance: Balancing Proprietary Rights And The Right To Know, Eric Easton
All Faculty Scholarship
Articulating a coherent, all-encompassing First Amendment doctrine for freedom of speech and of the press has so far eluded every scholar who has tried, not least because of the variety of analytical approaches and potentially dispositive factors in Supreme Court jurisprudence. For example, the same regulation might be enforceable in one medium, but not another; in one forum, but not another. Enforceability may depend on the regulator's purpose and drafting skill, or not, depending in turn on whether the speech deserves full protection, some protection, or no protection at all. Sometimes enforceability depends on the speaker's intent, or knowledge, or …
Six Opinions By Mr. Justice Stevens: A New Methodology For Constitutional Cases?, Robert F. Nagel
Six Opinions By Mr. Justice Stevens: A New Methodology For Constitutional Cases?, Robert F. Nagel
Publications
No abstract provided.
The Executive Protection: Freezing The Financial Assets Of Alleged Terrorists, The Constitution, And Foreign Participation In U.S. Financial Markets, R. Colgate Selden
The Executive Protection: Freezing The Financial Assets Of Alleged Terrorists, The Constitution, And Foreign Participation In U.S. Financial Markets, R. Colgate Selden
Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law
No abstract provided.
Enforcement Of Foreign Judgements, The First Amendment, And Internet Speech: Notes For The Next Yahoo! V. Licra, Molly S. Van Houweling
Enforcement Of Foreign Judgements, The First Amendment, And Internet Speech: Notes For The Next Yahoo! V. Licra, Molly S. Van Houweling
Michigan Journal of International Law
The Article begins with a review of the relevant rules governing enforcement of foreign judgments in the United States. Part II explains how courts have unpersuasively applied these rules when refusing to enforce foreign libel judgments. Part III then explains how the Yahoo! court adopted much of this faulty reasoning. Finally, Part IV explains the considerations that better justify judicial refusal to enforce speech-restrictive foreign judgments, especially those triggered by Internet speech. The Article concludes that the prospect that U.S. Internet speakers will choose to speak only to a U.S. audience-even when their speech would be legal everywhere-is the most …
Professional Sports Leagues And The First Amendment: A Closed Marketplace, Christopher J. Mckinny
Professional Sports Leagues And The First Amendment: A Closed Marketplace, Christopher J. Mckinny
Marquette Sports Law Review
No abstract provided.
Insert Coins To Slay - Regulating Children's Access To Violent Arcade Games, Elizabeth A. Previte
Insert Coins To Slay - Regulating Children's Access To Violent Arcade Games, Elizabeth A. Previte
Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Queers Anonymous: Lesbians, Gay Men, Free Speech, And Cyberspace, Edward Stein
Queers Anonymous: Lesbians, Gay Men, Free Speech, And Cyberspace, Edward Stein
Faculty Articles
No abstract provided.
Hate Speech In Constitutional Jurisprudence: A Comparative Analysis, Michel Rosenfeld
Hate Speech In Constitutional Jurisprudence: A Comparative Analysis, Michel Rosenfeld
Faculty Articles
The United States protects much hate speech that is banned in other Western constitutional democracies and under international human rights covenants and conventions. In the United States, only hate speech that leads to "incitement to violence" can be constitutionally restricted, while under the alternative approach found elsewhere, bans properly extend to hate speech leading to "incitement to hatred." The article undertakes a comparative analysis in light of changes brought by new technologies, such as the internet, which allow for worldwide spread of protected hate speech originating in the United States. After evaluating the respective doctrines, arguments and values involved, the …
Robust Public Debate: Realizing Free Speech In Workplace Representation Elections, Kate Andrias
Robust Public Debate: Realizing Free Speech In Workplace Representation Elections, Kate Andrias
Faculty Scholarship
The First Amendment stands as a guarantor of political freedom and as the “guardian of our democracy.” It seeks to expand the vitality of public discourse in order to enable Americans to become aware of the issues before them and to pursue their ends fully and freely. As the Supreme Court wrote in the canonical case of New York Times Co. v . Sullivan, the First Amendment’s function is to create the “uninhibited, robust and wide-open” public debate necessary for the exercise of self-governance.
The Amendment plays a prominent role in the regulation of workplace representation elections, the process …