Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Institution
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 23 of 23
Full-Text Articles in Law
Appeal No. 0709: Valley Enterprises V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0709: Valley Enterprises V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2002-11
Appeal No. 0704: Rocanville Corporation V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0704: Rocanville Corporation V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2001-62
Keep Your Mouth Shut And Listen: The Nfl Player's Right Of Free Expression, Thomas E. Fielder
Keep Your Mouth Shut And Listen: The Nfl Player's Right Of Free Expression, Thomas E. Fielder
University of Miami Business Law Review
No abstract provided.
Appeal No. 0694: Energex Oil & Gas Corporation V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0694: Energex Oil & Gas Corporation V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2000-67
Appeal No. 0695: Energex Oil & Gas Corporation V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0695: Energex Oil & Gas Corporation V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2000-68
Appeal No. 0705: Halwell Company, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0705: Halwell Company, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 2001-55, 2002-06, 2002-08
Appeal No. 0708: Halwell Company, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0708: Halwell Company, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 2001-55, 2002-06, 2002-08
Appeal No. 0707: Halwell Company, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0707: Halwell Company, Inc. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 2001-55, 2002-06, 2002-08
Appeal No. 0706: Progressive Gas & Oil Co. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0706: Progressive Gas & Oil Co. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2001-71
Appeal No. 0702: Mormack Industries, Inc, S & S Energy Corporation V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management & Mr. & Mrs. Calvin Mcmullin, Mr. & Mrs. Kevin Yoder, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0702: Mormack Industries, Inc, S & S Energy Corporation V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management & Mr. & Mrs. Calvin Mcmullin, Mr. & Mrs. Kevin Yoder, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2001-14
Appeal No. 0700: Mormack Industries, Inc, S & S Energy Corporation V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management & Mr. & Mrs. Calvin Mcmullin, Mr. & Mrs. Kevin Yoder, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0700: Mormack Industries, Inc, S & S Energy Corporation V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management & Mr. & Mrs. Calvin Mcmullin, Mr. & Mrs. Kevin Yoder, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2001-14
Appeal No. 0703: James & Mary Riordan V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0703: James & Mary Riordan V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2001-37 (Mandatory Pooling)
Appeal No. 0674: Pottmeyer Oil & Gas V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0674: Pottmeyer Oil & Gas V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 99-113
Appeal No. 0699: C & M Gas And Oil V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0699: C & M Gas And Oil V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2001-6
Appeal No. 0689: Ohio Valley Coal Company V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0689: Ohio Valley Coal Company V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 27503
Appeal No. 0701: American Insurance Co. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0701: American Insurance Co. V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2011-13
A Tale Of Two Lawyers In Antebellum Cincinnati: Timothy Walker's Last Conversation With Salmon P. Chase, Gordon A. Christenson
A Tale Of Two Lawyers In Antebellum Cincinnati: Timothy Walker's Last Conversation With Salmon P. Chase, Gordon A. Christenson
Faculty Articles and Other Publications
Timothy Walker's reputation today is slower to recover the same national stature he achieved while living. He was close to the founding generation, yet believed in law reform and codification to see an end of slavery and stave off chaos from the crowd and popular democracy. For a time, he was a "man of his age" in Cincinnati, where in word and deed he projected the civic republicanism of the founders into a future for the new democrats. There is no public memorial for Walker, though the obelisk monument rises in Spring Grove Cemetery and his bust is displayed prominently …
The Uniform Trust Code (2000) And Its Application To Ohio, David M. English
The Uniform Trust Code (2000) And Its Application To Ohio, David M. English
Faculty Publications
This article provides an overview of the U.T.C., focusing on how its enactment would change existing Ohio law. The drafting of the U.T.C. was prompted by the much greater use of trusts in recent years. This greater use of the trust and consequent rise in the number of day-to-day questions involving trusts led to a recognition by the Commissioners that the trust law in most states is thin, leaving many gaps between the often few statutes and reported cases
Ghosts From The Grave-Inheriting Through The Predeceased Under Ohio Law , Kevin Purcell
Ghosts From The Grave-Inheriting Through The Predeceased Under Ohio Law , Kevin Purcell
Cleveland State Law Review
This Article seeks to advise the estate-planning attorney that Ohio's laws concerning inheriting through predeceased persons is a labyrinth of arbitrary rules, the majority of which serve no apparent public policy. Specifically, very different sets of rules apply to inheriting through a predeceased person via intestacy, a will, a living trust, or a "beneficiary designation" type account, such as a "payable on death" account (hereinafter P.O.D.). Additionally, Ohio law contains surprisingly high doses of ambiguity in some of the most basic principles of law relating to inheriting through predeceased next of kin or predeceased named-beneficiaries in a dispositive-planning instrument. Rather …
Sentencing Consistency: Basic Principles Instead Of Numerical Grids: The Ohio Plan, Burt W. Griffin, Lewis R. Katz
Sentencing Consistency: Basic Principles Instead Of Numerical Grids: The Ohio Plan, Burt W. Griffin, Lewis R. Katz
Case Western Reserve Law Review
No abstract provided.
Can You Keep A Secret: Discoverability And Admissibility Of Confidential Settlement Agreement Amounts In Ohio ?, Christine M. Tomko
Can You Keep A Secret: Discoverability And Admissibility Of Confidential Settlement Agreement Amounts In Ohio ?, Christine M. Tomko
Case Western Reserve Law Review
No abstract provided.
Why The Ohio Bureau Of Workers' Compensation Must Refund Fifty Million Dollars In Subrogation Payments: A Detailed Look Into The State Of Subrogation In Ohio After Holeton V. Crouse Cartage Company, Anthony Alan Baucco
Cleveland State Law Review
This Note begins by examining the complex history behind workers' compensation subrogation rights in the state of Ohio. This historical timeline flows from the period when statutory subrogation was non-existent in Ohio, to the first version of a subrogation statute in 1993, and finally to the broadened and revised statute in 1995. A detailed examination of the Supreme Court of Ohio's decision in Holeton v. Crouse Cartage Company follows the historical overview and focuses on the unconstitutionality of Ohio Revised Code section 4123.931. Additionally, the popular competing views gleaned from both the dissent in Holeton and the Bureau of Workers' …
Civil Rights For Gays And Lesbians And Domestic Partner Benefits: How Far Could An Ohio Municipality Go , Mark A. Tumeo
Civil Rights For Gays And Lesbians And Domestic Partner Benefits: How Far Could An Ohio Municipality Go , Mark A. Tumeo
Cleveland State Law Review
It can be seen from the analyses in this Article that ordinances which grant domestic partnership benefits and/or civil rights to gays and lesbians will probably face a complex gambit of legal challenges under state law, federal law, and both State and U.S. Constitutions. Current law and current common practice in the State, however, indicates that municipalities probably have almost unfettered power to pass ordinances that either grant protection or deny protection to gays and lesbians in the area of employment and housing discrimination within the municipalities jurisdiction. The situation is not as clear when it comes to domestic partnership …