Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

PDF

1962

Discipline
Institution
Keyword
Publication
Publication Type

Articles 1 - 30 of 1906

Full-Text Articles in Law

State Of Utah V. Dennis Sherman Kinder : Brief Of Appellant, Utah Supreme Court Dec 1962

State Of Utah V. Dennis Sherman Kinder : Brief Of Appellant, Utah Supreme Court

Utah Supreme Court Briefs (cases filed before 1965)

Appeal from the Judgment of the 3rd District Court for Salt Lake County. Honorable Marcellus K. Snow, Judge.


Utah Parks Co. V. Iron County And Cedar City Corp. : Answering Brief Of Cedar City Corp., Utah Supreme Court Dec 1962

Utah Parks Co. V. Iron County And Cedar City Corp. : Answering Brief Of Cedar City Corp., Utah Supreme Court

Utah Supreme Court Briefs (cases filed before 1965)

Appeals from the Judgments of the 5th District Court for Iron County. Hon. Will L. Hoyt, Judge, in Case No. 9540. Hon. C. Nelson Day, Judge, in Case No. 9753


Wycoff Co. V. Public Service Commission Of Utah Et Al : Brief Of Defendants, Utah Supreme Court Dec 1962

Wycoff Co. V. Public Service Commission Of Utah Et Al : Brief Of Defendants, Utah Supreme Court

Utah Supreme Court Briefs (cases filed before 1965)

Appeal from Order of Public Service Commission of Utah.


Wycoff Co. V. Public Service Commission Of Utah Et Al : Brief Of Defendant, Utah Supreme Court Dec 1962

Wycoff Co. V. Public Service Commission Of Utah Et Al : Brief Of Defendant, Utah Supreme Court

Utah Supreme Court Briefs (cases filed before 1965)

No abstract provided.


Wycoff Company V. Public Service Commission Of Utah Et Al : Brief Of Defendants, Utah Supreme Court Dec 1962

Wycoff Company V. Public Service Commission Of Utah Et Al : Brief Of Defendants, Utah Supreme Court

Utah Supreme Court Briefs (cases filed before 1965)

Appeal from Order of Public Service Commission of Utah


Wycoff Company V. Public Service Commission Of Utah Et Al : Brief Of Defendant, Utah Supreme Court Dec 1962

Wycoff Company V. Public Service Commission Of Utah Et Al : Brief Of Defendant, Utah Supreme Court

Utah Supreme Court Briefs (cases filed before 1965)

Appeal from Order of Public Service Commission of Utah


D. H. Oliver V. Charles Lee Mitchell : Appellant's Petition For Rehearing, Utah Supreme Court Dec 1962

D. H. Oliver V. Charles Lee Mitchell : Appellant's Petition For Rehearing, Utah Supreme Court

Utah Supreme Court Briefs (cases filed before 1965)

Appeal from Third Judicial District Court in and for Salt Lake County, State of Utah. Judgments for Plaintiff by Judge Marcellus K. Snow and A. H. Ellett.


Vol. 13, No. 14, December 14, 1962, University Of Michigan Law School Dec 1962

Vol. 13, No. 14, December 14, 1962, University Of Michigan Law School

Res Gestae

•"Law in the News" Broadcast •Musicale •Miscellaneous Morsels •At the Frat •At the Flicks •Quadsville Quotes


Virginia Bar Exam, December 1962, Day 2 Dec 1962

Virginia Bar Exam, December 1962, Day 2

Virginia Bar Exam Archive

No abstract provided.


Virginia Bar Exam, December 1962, Day 1 Dec 1962

Virginia Bar Exam, December 1962, Day 1

Virginia Bar Exam Archive

No abstract provided.


Estate Planning Session, H. Brice Graves, W. Gibson Harris, Toy D. Savage Jr. Dec 1962

Estate Planning Session, H. Brice Graves, W. Gibson Harris, Toy D. Savage Jr.

William & Mary Annual Tax Conference

No abstract provided.


Vol. 13, No. 13, December 7, 1962, University Of Michigan Law School Dec 1962

Vol. 13, No. 13, December 7, 1962, University Of Michigan Law School

Res Gestae

•International Law Exchange Program - For Students and Graduates •Admissions Office Report •Society Column •Cook Lecture •Quadsville Quotes •Cartoon Caption


State Of Utah V. Edgar Glen Cude : Brief Of Respondent, Utah Supreme Court Dec 1962

State Of Utah V. Edgar Glen Cude : Brief Of Respondent, Utah Supreme Court

Utah Supreme Court Briefs (cases filed before 1965)

Appeal from the Judgment of the 2nd District Court for Weber County. Hon. Parley E. Norseth, Judge.


Book Review (Reviewing James C. N. Paul Et Al., Federal Censorship: Obscenity In The Mail (1961)), Harry Kalven Jr. Dec 1962

Book Review (Reviewing James C. N. Paul Et Al., Federal Censorship: Obscenity In The Mail (1961)), Harry Kalven Jr.

Articles

No abstract provided.


Revised Uniform Principal And Income Act, George Gleason Bogert Dec 1962

Revised Uniform Principal And Income Act, George Gleason Bogert

Articles

No abstract provided.


Revised Uniform Principal And Income Act, George G. Bogert Dec 1962

Revised Uniform Principal And Income Act, George G. Bogert

Notre Dame Law Review

No abstract provided.


Book Reviews, Roger Paul Peters, Carl F. Eiberger Dec 1962

Book Reviews, Roger Paul Peters, Carl F. Eiberger

Notre Dame Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Opinion Volume Iii Number 1 – December 1, 1962, The Opinion Dec 1962

The Opinion Volume Iii Number 1 – December 1, 1962, The Opinion

The Opinion Newspaper (all issues)

The Opinion newspaper issue dated December 1, 1962


Insurance, G. Frank Purvis Jr. Dec 1962

Insurance, G. Frank Purvis Jr.

Louisiana Law Review

No abstract provided.


Secured Transactions Under The Uniform Commercial Code, Robert S. Summers Dec 1962

Secured Transactions Under The Uniform Commercial Code, Robert S. Summers

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.


Evidence--Identity Of Driver In Absence Of Direct Evidence, William Thomas Harrison Dec 1962

Evidence--Identity Of Driver In Absence Of Direct Evidence, William Thomas Harrison

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.


A Comment On Damages In Unlawful Detainer Actions In Washington, Cornelius J. Peck Dec 1962

A Comment On Damages In Unlawful Detainer Actions In Washington, Cornelius J. Peck

Washington Law Review

One might hope that the damage aspects of litigation under a statute enacted in 1891 would now be so well explored and thoroughly understood as to be beyond the area of current comment. However, the product of the years has been an accumulation of inconsistent and ambiguous statements as well as a few instances of obvious conflict between decisions, all of which goes to make a review appropriate. Moreover, a recent decision of the supreme court in a case which has already been noted in these pages holds that set-offs and counterclaims cannot be adjudicated in unlawful detainer proceedings—a holding …


Constititional Law -- Due Process -- Fluoridation Of Water Supplies, Classen J. Gramm Dec 1962

Constititional Law -- Due Process -- Fluoridation Of Water Supplies, Classen J. Gramm

Notre Dame Law Review

No abstract provided.


Legislation And Administration: Lobbying -- Multi-State Statutory Survey -- Requirements And Procedures For Lobbying Activities, Frank P. Maggio Dec 1962

Legislation And Administration: Lobbying -- Multi-State Statutory Survey -- Requirements And Procedures For Lobbying Activities, Frank P. Maggio

Notre Dame Law Review

No abstract provided.


Expatriation--Its Origin And Meaning, Daniel Klubock Dec 1962

Expatriation--Its Origin And Meaning, Daniel Klubock

Notre Dame Law Review

No abstract provided.


Conflict Of Laws--Full Faith And Credit--Lack Of Jurisdiction Vs. Mistake Of Law, Ralph Charles Dusic Jr. Dec 1962

Conflict Of Laws--Full Faith And Credit--Lack Of Jurisdiction Vs. Mistake Of Law, Ralph Charles Dusic Jr.

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.


Community Property Agreements—Many Questions, Few Answers, Robert F. Brachtenbach Dec 1962

Community Property Agreements—Many Questions, Few Answers, Robert F. Brachtenbach

Washington Law Review

The statute which creates the husband-wife contract commonly referred to as the community property agreement was first enacted by the Territorial Legislature of 1879. Today's statute is RCW 26.16.120.2 A 1950 Law Review Comment' made a comprehensive analysis of many of the issues raised by the community property agreement. Reference is made to the Comment for background material. This article has a dual purpose: first, to inquire further into some of the issues discussed in the 1950 Comment with particular and detailed attention to creditors' problems, and second, to examine today's practice as to the use of these agreements, looking …


Washington Receivership, Ray Graves Dec 1962

Washington Receivership, Ray Graves

Washington Law Review

A full discussion of the historical development of the law of receivership, of the powers and duties of the numerous kinds of receivers, and of the advantages or disadvantages of receivership as contrasted with bankruptcy and other devices, is beyond the scope of this article. This discussion is limited to an examination of some of the rules governing appointment of general liquidating receivers in the State of Washington. Within that framework we shall examine two facets of the law, viz., (a) the sources and general rules of the law of receivership in Washington, and (b) the procedures to be followed …


Choosing The Share Structure Of A Washington Business Corporation, Douglas Shaw Palmer Dec 1962

Choosing The Share Structure Of A Washington Business Corporation, Douglas Shaw Palmer

Washington Law Review

The principals in a business corporation can make part of their investment in the corporation in the form of loans, and they can defer decision on this until after incorporation. They must, however, make some part of their investment in the form of an ownership or share interest, and they must provide for this in their articles of incorporation. For Washington corporations the choice of these provisions is needlessly complicated by the existing Business Corporation Act. And no improvement is in sight under the American Bar Association- American Law Institute Model Business Corporation Act (hereinafter, "Model Act") which is being …


Turnbow V. Commissioner—Rejection Of The "Boot" Exception To A Type B Reorganization?, F. Robert Debruyn Dec 1962

Turnbow V. Commissioner—Rejection Of The "Boot" Exception To A Type B Reorganization?, F. Robert Debruyn

Washington Law Review

The United States Supreme Court in Turnbow v. Commissioner may have interpreted the Internal Revenue Code to preclude the receipt of "boot" in a non-taxable, stock for stock reorganization. Although the Court was interpreting the application of Section 112 of the 1939 Code, the decision may be decisive in the interpretation of the parallel sections in the 1954 Code.